氨甲环酸用于肩袖修复术:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1177/03635465231216336
Eoghan T Hurley, Kaitlyn Rodriguez, Mark P Karavan, Jay M Levin, Joshua Helmkamp, Oke Anakwenze, Michael J Alaia, Christopher S Klifto
{"title":"氨甲环酸用于肩袖修复术:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。","authors":"Eoghan T Hurley, Kaitlyn Rodriguez, Mark P Karavan, Jay M Levin, Joshua Helmkamp, Oke Anakwenze, Michael J Alaia, Christopher S Klifto","doi":"10.1177/03635465231216336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to assess the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in the setting of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). However, these studies have shown mixed results, with some showing improved intraoperative visualization, subsequent operative times, and pain levels, and others finding no difference.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a systematic review of the RCTs in the literature to evaluate the use of TXA on ARCR.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, with a third author resolving any discrepancies. RCTs comparing TXA with a control in ARCR were included. Visualization, postoperative pain, operative time, pump pressures, and shoulder swelling were evaluated. A <i>P</i> value < .05 was deemed statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs with 450 patients were included in this review. Overall, 5 studies evaluated intraoperative visualization, with 3 studies finding a significant difference in favor of TXA. With TXA, patients had a lower mean postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score of 3.3, and with the control, patients had a mean VAS score of 4.1, which was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .001). With TXA, the mean weighted operation time was 79.3 minutes, and with the control, the mean operation time was 88.8 minutes, which was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .001). No study found any difference in intraoperative pump pressures or swelling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TXA improved visualization, operative time, and subsequent postoperative pain levels in patients undergoing ARCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3673-3679"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tranexamic Acid for Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Eoghan T Hurley, Kaitlyn Rodriguez, Mark P Karavan, Jay M Levin, Joshua Helmkamp, Oke Anakwenze, Michael J Alaia, Christopher S Klifto\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465231216336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to assess the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in the setting of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). However, these studies have shown mixed results, with some showing improved intraoperative visualization, subsequent operative times, and pain levels, and others finding no difference.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a systematic review of the RCTs in the literature to evaluate the use of TXA on ARCR.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, with a third author resolving any discrepancies. RCTs comparing TXA with a control in ARCR were included. Visualization, postoperative pain, operative time, pump pressures, and shoulder swelling were evaluated. A <i>P</i> value < .05 was deemed statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs with 450 patients were included in this review. Overall, 5 studies evaluated intraoperative visualization, with 3 studies finding a significant difference in favor of TXA. With TXA, patients had a lower mean postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score of 3.3, and with the control, patients had a mean VAS score of 4.1, which was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .001). With TXA, the mean weighted operation time was 79.3 minutes, and with the control, the mean operation time was 88.8 minutes, which was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .001). No study found any difference in intraoperative pump pressures or swelling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TXA improved visualization, operative time, and subsequent postoperative pain levels in patients undergoing ARCR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3673-3679\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231216336\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231216336","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:已有多项随机对照试验(RCT)评估了在关节镜下肩袖修复术(ARCR)中使用氨甲环酸(TXA)的情况。目的:对文献中评估在 ARCR 中使用氨甲环酸的 RCT 进行系统回顾:研究设计:荟萃分析;证据等级,1.方法:两位独立审稿人根据PRISMA(系统综述和Meta分析首选报告项目)指南进行文献检索,由第三位作者解决任何差异。纳入了在 ARCR 中比较 TXA 与对照组的 RCT。对视野、术后疼痛、手术时间、泵压和肩部肿胀进行了评估。结果:本综述共纳入六项研究,450 名患者。共有 5 项研究对术中可视化进行了评估,其中 3 项研究发现 TXA 有显著差异。使用 TXA 时,患者术后的平均视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分较低,为 3.3 分,而使用对照组时,患者的平均视觉模拟量表评分为 4.1 分,差异有统计学意义(P = .001)。使用 TXA 时,平均加权手术时间为 79.3 分钟,而使用对照组时,平均手术时间为 88.8 分钟,差异有统计学意义(P = .001)。没有研究发现术中泵压或肿胀有任何差异:结论:TXA 可改善 ARCR 患者的视野、手术时间和术后疼痛程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tranexamic Acid for Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to assess the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in the setting of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). However, these studies have shown mixed results, with some showing improved intraoperative visualization, subsequent operative times, and pain levels, and others finding no difference.

Purpose: To perform a systematic review of the RCTs in the literature to evaluate the use of TXA on ARCR.

Study design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, with a third author resolving any discrepancies. RCTs comparing TXA with a control in ARCR were included. Visualization, postoperative pain, operative time, pump pressures, and shoulder swelling were evaluated. A P value < .05 was deemed statistically significant.

Results: Six RCTs with 450 patients were included in this review. Overall, 5 studies evaluated intraoperative visualization, with 3 studies finding a significant difference in favor of TXA. With TXA, patients had a lower mean postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score of 3.3, and with the control, patients had a mean VAS score of 4.1, which was statistically significant (P = .001). With TXA, the mean weighted operation time was 79.3 minutes, and with the control, the mean operation time was 88.8 minutes, which was statistically significant (P = .001). No study found any difference in intraoperative pump pressures or swelling.

Conclusion: TXA improved visualization, operative time, and subsequent postoperative pain levels in patients undergoing ARCR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
期刊最新文献
Tranexamic Acid for Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Knee Stability in Remnant-Preserving ACL Reconstruction Versus Standard ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Effects of Losartan and Fisetin on Microfracture-Mediated Cartilage Repair of Ankle Cartilage in a Rabbit Model. Functional Outcomes of Immediate Weightbearing After Arthroscopic Lateral Ankle Ligament Repair: A Prospective Randomized Single-Center Trial. One-Step Cartilage Repair of Full-Thickness Knee Chondral Lesions Using a Hyaluronic Acid-Based Scaffold Embedded With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: Long-term Outcomes After Mean Follow-up Duration of 14 Years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1