用于外科伤口灌洗的创新设备:临床前测试和临床验证试验研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-18 DOI:10.1080/13645706.2024.2317196
Yoshinori Hayashi, Takehiro Noda, Yasutaka Samizo, Kenji Fujimoto, Eiji Uemoto, Kotaro Yamashita, Takuro Saito, Koji Tanaka, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Tomoki Makino, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Yukinori Kurokawa, Shogo Kobayashi, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuichiro Doki, Kiyokazu Nakajima
{"title":"用于外科伤口灌洗的创新设备:临床前测试和临床验证试验研究。","authors":"Yoshinori Hayashi, Takehiro Noda, Yasutaka Samizo, Kenji Fujimoto, Eiji Uemoto, Kotaro Yamashita, Takuro Saito, Koji Tanaka, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Tomoki Makino, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Yukinori Kurokawa, Shogo Kobayashi, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuichiro Doki, Kiyokazu Nakajima","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2317196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) poses a substantial postoperative challenge, affecting patient recovery and healthcare costs. While surgical wound irrigation is pivotal in SSI reduction, consensus on the optimal method remains elusive. We developed a novel device for surgical wound irrigation and conducted preclinical and clinical evaluations to evaluate its efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two preclinical experiments using swine were performed. In the washability test, two contaminated wound model were established, and the cleansing rate between the device and the conventional method were compared. In the contamination test, the irrigation procedure with a fluorescent solution assessed the surrounding contamination of drapes. Subsequently, a clinical trial involving patients undergoing abdominal surgery was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The washability test demonstrated significantly higher cleansing rates with the device method (86.4% and 82.5%) compared to the conventional method (65.2% and 65.1%) in two contamination models. The contamination test revealed a smaller contaminated region with the device method than the conventional method. In the clinical trial involving 17 abdominal surgery cases, no superficial SSIs or adverse events related to device use were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our newly developed device exhibits potential for achieving more effective and safe SSI control compared to conventional wound irrigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"200-206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative device for surgical wound irrigation: a preclinical testing and pilot clinical validation study.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshinori Hayashi, Takehiro Noda, Yasutaka Samizo, Kenji Fujimoto, Eiji Uemoto, Kotaro Yamashita, Takuro Saito, Koji Tanaka, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Tomoki Makino, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Yukinori Kurokawa, Shogo Kobayashi, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuichiro Doki, Kiyokazu Nakajima\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13645706.2024.2317196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) poses a substantial postoperative challenge, affecting patient recovery and healthcare costs. While surgical wound irrigation is pivotal in SSI reduction, consensus on the optimal method remains elusive. We developed a novel device for surgical wound irrigation and conducted preclinical and clinical evaluations to evaluate its efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two preclinical experiments using swine were performed. In the washability test, two contaminated wound model were established, and the cleansing rate between the device and the conventional method were compared. In the contamination test, the irrigation procedure with a fluorescent solution assessed the surrounding contamination of drapes. Subsequently, a clinical trial involving patients undergoing abdominal surgery was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The washability test demonstrated significantly higher cleansing rates with the device method (86.4% and 82.5%) compared to the conventional method (65.2% and 65.1%) in two contamination models. The contamination test revealed a smaller contaminated region with the device method than the conventional method. In the clinical trial involving 17 abdominal surgery cases, no superficial SSIs or adverse events related to device use were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our newly developed device exhibits potential for achieving more effective and safe SSI control compared to conventional wound irrigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"200-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2024.2317196\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2024.2317196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:手术部位感染(SSI)是一项巨大的术后挑战,影响着患者的康复和医疗成本。虽然手术伤口冲洗对减少 SSI 至关重要,但最佳方法仍未达成共识。我们开发了一种用于手术伤口冲洗的新型装置,并进行了临床前和临床评估,以评价其有效性和安全性:方法:使用猪进行了两项临床前实验。在可清洗性试验中,建立了两个污染伤口模型,比较了该装置和传统方法的清洗率。在污染测试中,用荧光溶液进行的冲洗程序评估了帘布周围的污染情况。随后,对接受腹部手术的患者进行了临床试验:结果:在两个污染模型中,可清洗性测试表明,与传统方法(65.2% 和 65.1%)相比,装置方法的清洗率(86.4% 和 82.5%)明显更高。污染测试显示,与传统方法相比,装置法的污染区域更小。在涉及 17 例腹部手术的临床试验中,没有观察到与装置使用有关的浅表 SSI 或不良事件:结论:与传统的伤口冲洗方法相比,我们新开发的设备具有更有效、更安全地控制 SSI 的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Innovative device for surgical wound irrigation: a preclinical testing and pilot clinical validation study.

Introduction: Surgical site infection (SSI) poses a substantial postoperative challenge, affecting patient recovery and healthcare costs. While surgical wound irrigation is pivotal in SSI reduction, consensus on the optimal method remains elusive. We developed a novel device for surgical wound irrigation and conducted preclinical and clinical evaluations to evaluate its efficacy and safety.

Methods: Two preclinical experiments using swine were performed. In the washability test, two contaminated wound model were established, and the cleansing rate between the device and the conventional method were compared. In the contamination test, the irrigation procedure with a fluorescent solution assessed the surrounding contamination of drapes. Subsequently, a clinical trial involving patients undergoing abdominal surgery was conducted.

Results: The washability test demonstrated significantly higher cleansing rates with the device method (86.4% and 82.5%) compared to the conventional method (65.2% and 65.1%) in two contamination models. The contamination test revealed a smaller contaminated region with the device method than the conventional method. In the clinical trial involving 17 abdominal surgery cases, no superficial SSIs or adverse events related to device use were observed.

Conclusions: Our newly developed device exhibits potential for achieving more effective and safe SSI control compared to conventional wound irrigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies (MITAT) is an international forum for endoscopic surgeons, interventional radiologists and industrial instrument manufacturers. It is the official journal of the Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT) whose membership includes representatives from a broad spectrum of medical specialities, instrument manufacturing and research. The journal brings the latest developments and innovations in minimally invasive therapy to its readers. What makes Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies unique is that we publish one or two special issues each year, which are devoted to a specific theme. Key topics covered by the journal include: interventional radiology, endoscopic surgery, imaging technology, manipulators and robotics for surgery and education and training for MIS.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic cardiac mucosal ligation: a novel minimally invasive procedure for gastroesophageal reflux disease. The effect of peritoneal flap fixation with curling technique on postoperative lymphocele formation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Right mini-thoracotomy for concomitant aortic valve replacement and right coronary artery bypass graft. Three-dimensional semiquantitative evaluation of reactive emphysema in magnesium implant models. Clash of the Titans: the first multi-center retrospective comparative study between da Vinci and Hugo RAS surgical systems for the treatment of deep endometriosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1