门口的数字颠覆者。金融科技贷款会影响银行的市场力量和稳定性吗?

IF 5.4 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.intfin.2024.101964
Pedro J. Cuadros-Solas , Elena Cubillas , Carlos Salvador , Nuria Suárez
{"title":"门口的数字颠覆者。金融科技贷款会影响银行的市场力量和稳定性吗?","authors":"Pedro J. Cuadros-Solas ,&nbsp;Elena Cubillas ,&nbsp;Carlos Salvador ,&nbsp;Nuria Suárez","doi":"10.1016/j.intfin.2024.101964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the effect of FinTech lending on the market power and stability of incumbent banks. Using an international sample of 6,225 banks during the period 2013–2019, our results show that the volume of credit provided by FinTech lenders negatively affects bank market power and stability. These results are influenced by the legal framework and institutional quality of each jurisdiction. Furthermore, the impact of FinTech lending on bank stability is partially channeled by the effect of FinTech credit on the market power of incumbent banks. Our main results – lower bank market power and bank stability – are also observed at the country level and after addressing potential endogeneity concerns. Regarding policy implications, more prudential regulation on FinTech activity is needed to address information imbalance issues and potential risks stemming from their activities. Furthermore, reinforcing the legal framework and institutional structure could serve to mitigate the adverse effects of FinTech lending on the traditional commercial banking sector.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 101964"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443124000301/pdfft?md5=64642ddf775b195c8a12a4fc441b2c87&pid=1-s2.0-S1042443124000301-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital disruptors at the gate. Does FinTech lending affect bank market power and stability?\",\"authors\":\"Pedro J. Cuadros-Solas ,&nbsp;Elena Cubillas ,&nbsp;Carlos Salvador ,&nbsp;Nuria Suárez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intfin.2024.101964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper examines the effect of FinTech lending on the market power and stability of incumbent banks. Using an international sample of 6,225 banks during the period 2013–2019, our results show that the volume of credit provided by FinTech lenders negatively affects bank market power and stability. These results are influenced by the legal framework and institutional quality of each jurisdiction. Furthermore, the impact of FinTech lending on bank stability is partially channeled by the effect of FinTech credit on the market power of incumbent banks. Our main results – lower bank market power and bank stability – are also observed at the country level and after addressing potential endogeneity concerns. Regarding policy implications, more prudential regulation on FinTech activity is needed to address information imbalance issues and potential risks stemming from their activities. Furthermore, reinforcing the legal framework and institutional structure could serve to mitigate the adverse effects of FinTech lending on the traditional commercial banking sector.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money\",\"volume\":\"92 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101964\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443124000301/pdfft?md5=64642ddf775b195c8a12a4fc441b2c87&pid=1-s2.0-S1042443124000301-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443124000301\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443124000301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了金融科技贷款对现有银行的市场力量和稳定性的影响。利用 2013-2019 年间 6225 家银行的国际样本,我们的研究结果表明,金融科技贷款机构提供的信贷量对银行的市场力量和稳定性产生了负面影响。这些结果受到各司法管辖区法律框架和机构质量的影响。此外,金融科技贷款对银行稳定性的影响部分来自于金融科技信贷对现有银行市场力量的影响。我们的主要结果--较低的银行市场力量和银行稳定性--在国家层面和解决了潜在的内生性问题后也被观察到。关于政策影响,需要对金融科技活动进行更审慎的监管,以解决信息失衡问题和金融科技活动带来的潜在风险。此外,加强法律框架和体制结构可减轻金融科技贷款对传统商业银行部门的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital disruptors at the gate. Does FinTech lending affect bank market power and stability?

This paper examines the effect of FinTech lending on the market power and stability of incumbent banks. Using an international sample of 6,225 banks during the period 2013–2019, our results show that the volume of credit provided by FinTech lenders negatively affects bank market power and stability. These results are influenced by the legal framework and institutional quality of each jurisdiction. Furthermore, the impact of FinTech lending on bank stability is partially channeled by the effect of FinTech credit on the market power of incumbent banks. Our main results – lower bank market power and bank stability – are also observed at the country level and after addressing potential endogeneity concerns. Regarding policy implications, more prudential regulation on FinTech activity is needed to address information imbalance issues and potential risks stemming from their activities. Furthermore, reinforcing the legal framework and institutional structure could serve to mitigate the adverse effects of FinTech lending on the traditional commercial banking sector.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: International trade, financing and investments, and the related cash and credit transactions, have grown at an extremely rapid pace in recent years. The international monetary system has continued to evolve to accommodate the need for foreign-currency denominated transactions and in the process has provided opportunities for its ongoing observation and study. The purpose of the Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money is to publish rigorous, original articles dealing with the international aspects of financial markets, institutions and money. Theoretical/conceptual and empirical papers providing meaningful insights into the subject areas will be considered. The following topic areas, although not exhaustive, are representative of the coverage in this Journal. • International financial markets • International securities markets • Foreign exchange markets • Eurocurrency markets • International syndications • Term structures of Eurocurrency rates • Determination of exchange rates • Information, speculation and parity • Forward rates and swaps • International payment mechanisms • International commercial banking; • International investment banking • Central bank intervention • International monetary systems • Balance of payments.
期刊最新文献
Carbon emission trading scheme, investors’ attention, and earnings response coefficients Global banks and the picking order in internal capital markets: Do locational activity patterns matter? HACKED: Understanding the stock market response to cyberattacks Does climate risk shape firms’ accounting conservatism? Real earnings management and debt choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1