电影俱乐部:集体手术视频审查计划。

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-02-24 DOI:10.1111/medu.15357
Nicole E. Brooks, Xiaoxi Feng, Chelsea, Judith C. French, Robert Simon, Jeremy M. Lipman, Ajita S. Prabhu
{"title":"电影俱乐部:集体手术视频审查计划。","authors":"Nicole E. Brooks,&nbsp;Xiaoxi Feng,&nbsp;Chelsea,&nbsp;Judith C. French,&nbsp;Robert Simon,&nbsp;Jeremy M. Lipman,&nbsp;Ajita S. Prabhu","doi":"10.1111/medu.15357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Operative video review is important to the growth of surgical trainees, with demonstrated efficacy of one-on-one video-based coaching.<span><sup>1</sup></span> While in-the-moment feedback is necessary, asynchronous coaching accompanying video review offers control of learning tempo and cognitive load in a setting without constraints and distractions imposed by the operating room. This allows for meaningful self-reflection, guidance and retained learning. However, barriers to video review are frequently cited that prevent its optimal use. Residents within our general surgery program requested more operative feedback but seldom reviewed their own videos or pursued coaching due to time and effort required.</p><p>A monthly, in-person collaborative learning experience in an operative video review program, ‘Film Club’, was created to decrease the burden of video coaching and engage more residents in the practice. The conference benefits from peer learning while remaining under the expert guidance of two attending facilitators/coaches. Program leadership or resident volunteers record operations for the group to review. During each session, one to two operative videos are viewed, with constructive feedback and open discussion from residents and facilitators throughout.</p><p>Current engagement in Film Club is high. However, early attendance waned as the novelty of the program wore off. With recommendations from residents, time and location have been changed to those most convenient for them. Leadership has worked to gain buy-in from senior residents, who lead their services and set the tone for allowing and encouraging attendance. We believe these changes stimulated our recent improvement in engagement.</p><p>Our first rule of film club was to create a psychologically safe environment. It can be an uncomfortable experience for others to watch one's surgical videos, particularly through the critical lens required of this conference. We have participants sign an agreement that conversation does not leave the room and ground rules are set around constructive language in discussing operative skill and decision making. We made all videos anonymous, but discussions would often lead to questions and comments that could only be addressed by someone familiar with the case. We learned that after our establishment of a safe environment, we were able to progress and make videos identifiable. Our current format first occurred naturally, when the resident operating in the video volunteered background and insight throughout the operation. Coaching for the operating resident and the overall discussion were rich and informed. Residents requested that this change continue. These livelier discussions have also improved meaningful peer learning.</p><p>Film Club offers a feasible, efficient group setting for operative video review to impact many learners, who note it as a meaningful, valued educational experience. An indirect benefit of individual residents privately reviewing their own operative videos has been reported, which was a practice not regularly seen before. Residents have commented on the value they now appreciate from the asynchronous, slowed-down, reflective learning and how they have applied their observations to their operative performance. Beyond its direct impact, Film Club may open doors for a changed culture of video review within our program.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15357","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Film Club: A group surgical video review program\",\"authors\":\"Nicole E. Brooks,&nbsp;Xiaoxi Feng,&nbsp;Chelsea,&nbsp;Judith C. French,&nbsp;Robert Simon,&nbsp;Jeremy M. Lipman,&nbsp;Ajita S. Prabhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/medu.15357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Operative video review is important to the growth of surgical trainees, with demonstrated efficacy of one-on-one video-based coaching.<span><sup>1</sup></span> While in-the-moment feedback is necessary, asynchronous coaching accompanying video review offers control of learning tempo and cognitive load in a setting without constraints and distractions imposed by the operating room. This allows for meaningful self-reflection, guidance and retained learning. However, barriers to video review are frequently cited that prevent its optimal use. Residents within our general surgery program requested more operative feedback but seldom reviewed their own videos or pursued coaching due to time and effort required.</p><p>A monthly, in-person collaborative learning experience in an operative video review program, ‘Film Club’, was created to decrease the burden of video coaching and engage more residents in the practice. The conference benefits from peer learning while remaining under the expert guidance of two attending facilitators/coaches. Program leadership or resident volunteers record operations for the group to review. During each session, one to two operative videos are viewed, with constructive feedback and open discussion from residents and facilitators throughout.</p><p>Current engagement in Film Club is high. However, early attendance waned as the novelty of the program wore off. With recommendations from residents, time and location have been changed to those most convenient for them. Leadership has worked to gain buy-in from senior residents, who lead their services and set the tone for allowing and encouraging attendance. We believe these changes stimulated our recent improvement in engagement.</p><p>Our first rule of film club was to create a psychologically safe environment. It can be an uncomfortable experience for others to watch one's surgical videos, particularly through the critical lens required of this conference. We have participants sign an agreement that conversation does not leave the room and ground rules are set around constructive language in discussing operative skill and decision making. We made all videos anonymous, but discussions would often lead to questions and comments that could only be addressed by someone familiar with the case. We learned that after our establishment of a safe environment, we were able to progress and make videos identifiable. Our current format first occurred naturally, when the resident operating in the video volunteered background and insight throughout the operation. Coaching for the operating resident and the overall discussion were rich and informed. Residents requested that this change continue. These livelier discussions have also improved meaningful peer learning.</p><p>Film Club offers a feasible, efficient group setting for operative video review to impact many learners, who note it as a meaningful, valued educational experience. An indirect benefit of individual residents privately reviewing their own operative videos has been reported, which was a practice not regularly seen before. Residents have commented on the value they now appreciate from the asynchronous, slowed-down, reflective learning and how they have applied their observations to their operative performance. Beyond its direct impact, Film Club may open doors for a changed culture of video review within our program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15357\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15357\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15357","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术视频复习对外科学员的成长非常重要,一对一视频辅导的效果已得到证实。1 虽然即时反馈是必要的,但伴随视频复习的异步辅导可在没有手术室限制和干扰的环境中控制学习节奏和认知负荷。这样可以进行有意义的自我反思、指导和保持学习。然而,视频复习经常会遇到一些障碍,使其无法得到充分利用。我们普外科项目的住院医师要求获得更多的手术反馈,但由于需要花费时间和精力,他们很少回顾自己的视频或寻求指导。为了减轻视频指导的负担,让更多住院医师参与到实践中,我们创建了每月一次的手术视频回顾计划 "电影俱乐部",让住院医师亲自参加协作学习。会议在两名与会主持人/教练的专家指导下进行,同时还能从同行学习中获益。项目领导或住院医师志愿者将操作过程录制下来,供小组回顾。在每次会议期间,都会观看一到两部手术视频,住院医师和主持人会全程提供建设性的反馈意见并进行公开讨论。目前,电影俱乐部的参与度很高。不过,随着该计划的新鲜感逐渐消失,早期的参与度也有所下降。在居民的建议下,活动时间和地点改为居民最方便的时间和地点。领导层努力争取老年居民的支持,由他们领导自己的服务,并为允许和鼓励参加活动定下基调。我们相信,这些变化促使我们最近的参与度有所提高。我们的电影俱乐部的第一条规则是创造一个心理安全的环境。对于其他人来说,观看自己的手术视频可能是一种不舒服的体验,尤其是通过本次会议所要求的批判性视角。我们让参与者签署一份协议,保证谈话不会离开房间,并围绕讨论手术技巧和决策时的建设性语言制定了基本规则。我们对所有视频进行了匿名处理,但讨论往往会引出一些问题和评论,而这些问题和评论只能由熟悉该病例的人来解决。我们了解到,在建立了安全的环境后,我们就能取得进步,并使视频具有可识别性。我们目前的形式首先是在视频中操作的住院医师在整个操作过程中主动提供背景和见解,这是很自然的事情。对操作住院医师的指导和整体讨论内容丰富,信息量大。住院医师要求继续保持这种变化。电影俱乐部为手术视频回顾提供了一个可行、高效的小组环境,影响了许多学习者,他们认为这是一次有意义、有价值的教育体验。据报道,住院医师个人私下审阅自己的手术视频也带来了间接的益处,这种做法以前并不多见。住院医师评论说,他们现在从这种异步、慢速、反思性的学习中体会到了价值,以及他们如何将观察结果应用到自己的手术表现中。除了其直接影响外,电影俱乐部还可能为我们项目中视频审查文化的改变打开大门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Film Club: A group surgical video review program

Operative video review is important to the growth of surgical trainees, with demonstrated efficacy of one-on-one video-based coaching.1 While in-the-moment feedback is necessary, asynchronous coaching accompanying video review offers control of learning tempo and cognitive load in a setting without constraints and distractions imposed by the operating room. This allows for meaningful self-reflection, guidance and retained learning. However, barriers to video review are frequently cited that prevent its optimal use. Residents within our general surgery program requested more operative feedback but seldom reviewed their own videos or pursued coaching due to time and effort required.

A monthly, in-person collaborative learning experience in an operative video review program, ‘Film Club’, was created to decrease the burden of video coaching and engage more residents in the practice. The conference benefits from peer learning while remaining under the expert guidance of two attending facilitators/coaches. Program leadership or resident volunteers record operations for the group to review. During each session, one to two operative videos are viewed, with constructive feedback and open discussion from residents and facilitators throughout.

Current engagement in Film Club is high. However, early attendance waned as the novelty of the program wore off. With recommendations from residents, time and location have been changed to those most convenient for them. Leadership has worked to gain buy-in from senior residents, who lead their services and set the tone for allowing and encouraging attendance. We believe these changes stimulated our recent improvement in engagement.

Our first rule of film club was to create a psychologically safe environment. It can be an uncomfortable experience for others to watch one's surgical videos, particularly through the critical lens required of this conference. We have participants sign an agreement that conversation does not leave the room and ground rules are set around constructive language in discussing operative skill and decision making. We made all videos anonymous, but discussions would often lead to questions and comments that could only be addressed by someone familiar with the case. We learned that after our establishment of a safe environment, we were able to progress and make videos identifiable. Our current format first occurred naturally, when the resident operating in the video volunteered background and insight throughout the operation. Coaching for the operating resident and the overall discussion were rich and informed. Residents requested that this change continue. These livelier discussions have also improved meaningful peer learning.

Film Club offers a feasible, efficient group setting for operative video review to impact many learners, who note it as a meaningful, valued educational experience. An indirect benefit of individual residents privately reviewing their own operative videos has been reported, which was a practice not regularly seen before. Residents have commented on the value they now appreciate from the asynchronous, slowed-down, reflective learning and how they have applied their observations to their operative performance. Beyond its direct impact, Film Club may open doors for a changed culture of video review within our program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
Being the supervisor: A duo-ethnographic exploration of social justice in postgraduate health professions education. Epistemic injustice: The hidden vulnerability of medicine. Fostering the clinician as teacher: A realist review. Issue Information August in this issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1