月球原位大规模建造:巨岩凝固技术的定量评估

IF 10.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Engineering Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2024.03.004
{"title":"月球原位大规模建造:巨岩凝固技术的定量评估","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.eng.2024.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lunar habitat construction is crucial for successful lunar exploration missions. Due to the limitations of transportation conditions, extensive global research has been conducted on lunar <em>in situ</em> material processing techniques in recent years. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review, precise classification, and quantitative evaluation of these approaches, focusing specifically on four main approaches: reaction solidification (RS), sintering/melting (SM), bonding solidification (BS), and confinement formation (CF). Eight key indicators have been identified for the construction of low-cost and high-performance systems to assess the feasibility of these methods: <em>in situ</em> material ratio, curing temperature, curing time, implementation conditions, compressive strength, tensile strength, curing dimensions, and environmental adaptability. The scoring thresholds are determined by comparing the construction requirements with the actual capabilities. Among the evaluated methods, regolith bagging has emerged as a promising option due to its high <em>in situ</em> material ratio, low time requirement, lack of high-temperature requirements, and minimal shortcomings, with only the compressive strength falling below the neutral score. The compressive strength still maintains a value of 2–3 MPa. The proposed construction scheme utilizing regolith bags offers numerous advantages, including rapid and large-scale construction, ensured tensile strength, and reduced reliance on equipment and energy. In this study, guidelines for evaluating regolith solidification techniques are provided, and directions for improvement are offered. The proposed lunar habitat design based on regolith bags is a practical reference for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11783,"journal":{"name":"Engineering","volume":"39 ","pages":"Pages 204-221"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095809924001449/pdfft?md5=c8f9f1d86945c9b911af13f22ab69910&pid=1-s2.0-S2095809924001449-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lunar In Situ Large-Scale Construction: Quantitative Evaluation of Regolith Solidification Techniques\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eng.2024.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Lunar habitat construction is crucial for successful lunar exploration missions. Due to the limitations of transportation conditions, extensive global research has been conducted on lunar <em>in situ</em> material processing techniques in recent years. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review, precise classification, and quantitative evaluation of these approaches, focusing specifically on four main approaches: reaction solidification (RS), sintering/melting (SM), bonding solidification (BS), and confinement formation (CF). Eight key indicators have been identified for the construction of low-cost and high-performance systems to assess the feasibility of these methods: <em>in situ</em> material ratio, curing temperature, curing time, implementation conditions, compressive strength, tensile strength, curing dimensions, and environmental adaptability. The scoring thresholds are determined by comparing the construction requirements with the actual capabilities. Among the evaluated methods, regolith bagging has emerged as a promising option due to its high <em>in situ</em> material ratio, low time requirement, lack of high-temperature requirements, and minimal shortcomings, with only the compressive strength falling below the neutral score. The compressive strength still maintains a value of 2–3 MPa. The proposed construction scheme utilizing regolith bags offers numerous advantages, including rapid and large-scale construction, ensured tensile strength, and reduced reliance on equipment and energy. In this study, guidelines for evaluating regolith solidification techniques are provided, and directions for improvement are offered. The proposed lunar habitat design based on regolith bags is a practical reference for future research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 204-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095809924001449/pdfft?md5=c8f9f1d86945c9b911af13f22ab69910&pid=1-s2.0-S2095809924001449-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095809924001449\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095809924001449","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

月球栖息地的建造对于月球探测任务的成功至关重要。由于运输条件的限制,近年来全球对月球原位材料加工技术进行了广泛的研究。本文旨在对这些方法进行全面综述、精确分类和定量评估,特别关注四种主要方法:反应凝固(RS)、烧结/熔融(SM)、粘结凝固(BS)和约束形成(CF)。为评估这些方法的可行性,确定了建造低成本高性能系统的八个关键指标:原位材料比、固化温度、固化时间、实施条件、抗压强度、抗拉强度、固化尺寸和环境适应性。通过比较施工要求和实际能力来确定评分阈值。在所评估的方法中,雷公石袋装法因其就地材料比率高、时间要求低、无高温要求、缺点极少(仅抗压强度低于中性分数)而成为一种有前途的选择。抗压强度仍保持在 2-3 兆帕之间。所提出的利用雷公石袋的施工方案具有许多优点,包括施工速度快、规模大、抗拉强度有保证、减少对设备和能源的依赖。本研究提供了评价摄岩石固化技术的指导原则,并提出了改进方向。提出的基于摄岩石袋的月球栖息地设计方案为今后的研究提供了实用参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lunar In Situ Large-Scale Construction: Quantitative Evaluation of Regolith Solidification Techniques

Lunar habitat construction is crucial for successful lunar exploration missions. Due to the limitations of transportation conditions, extensive global research has been conducted on lunar in situ material processing techniques in recent years. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review, precise classification, and quantitative evaluation of these approaches, focusing specifically on four main approaches: reaction solidification (RS), sintering/melting (SM), bonding solidification (BS), and confinement formation (CF). Eight key indicators have been identified for the construction of low-cost and high-performance systems to assess the feasibility of these methods: in situ material ratio, curing temperature, curing time, implementation conditions, compressive strength, tensile strength, curing dimensions, and environmental adaptability. The scoring thresholds are determined by comparing the construction requirements with the actual capabilities. Among the evaluated methods, regolith bagging has emerged as a promising option due to its high in situ material ratio, low time requirement, lack of high-temperature requirements, and minimal shortcomings, with only the compressive strength falling below the neutral score. The compressive strength still maintains a value of 2–3 MPa. The proposed construction scheme utilizing regolith bags offers numerous advantages, including rapid and large-scale construction, ensured tensile strength, and reduced reliance on equipment and energy. In this study, guidelines for evaluating regolith solidification techniques are provided, and directions for improvement are offered. The proposed lunar habitat design based on regolith bags is a practical reference for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering
Engineering Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
自引率
1.60%
发文量
335
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Engineering, an international open-access journal initiated by the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE) in 2015, serves as a distinguished platform for disseminating cutting-edge advancements in engineering R&D, sharing major research outputs, and highlighting key achievements worldwide. The journal's objectives encompass reporting progress in engineering science, fostering discussions on hot topics, addressing areas of interest, challenges, and prospects in engineering development, while considering human and environmental well-being and ethics in engineering. It aims to inspire breakthroughs and innovations with profound economic and social significance, propelling them to advanced international standards and transforming them into a new productive force. Ultimately, this endeavor seeks to bring about positive changes globally, benefit humanity, and shape a new future.
期刊最新文献
Digital Twins for Engineering Asset Management: Synthesis, Analytical Framework, and Future Directions Understanding the Resilience of Urban Rail Transit: Concepts, Reviews, and Trends Direct Ethylene Purification from Cracking Gas via a Metal–Organic Framework Through Pore Geometry Fitting Utilization of Bubbles and Oil for Microplastic Capture from Water Robust, Flexible, and Superhydrophobic Fabrics for High-Efficiency and Ultrawide-Band Microwave Absorption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1