肺部超声波能预测重症成人机械通气断流的结果吗?

Z. Abdelwahab, Ahmed M. Abdelazeem, Ahmed M. Abdelhameed, Enas Mahdy
{"title":"肺部超声波能预测重症成人机械通气断流的结果吗?","authors":"Z. Abdelwahab, Ahmed M. Abdelazeem, Ahmed M. Abdelhameed, Enas Mahdy","doi":"10.21608/bmfj.2024.255239.1978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to assess the ability of lung ultrasound (LUS) to predict mechanical ventilation (MV) weaning outcomes in critically ill adults. Methods: A prospective observational study that analyzed data collected from 50 adult patients, mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hours and eligible for their first spontaneous breathing trial. A LUS was performed prior to and at the end of a 1-hour SBT. To quantify lung aeration, a LUS score was calculated. Patients were divided into two groups according to their response to weaning trials with group A showing successful weaning while group B showing failed weaning. All included patients were followed up to Intensive Care Unit discharge. Results: Weaning failure was observed in 36% of patients. LUS score showed a significant difference between both groups (P < 0.001). Pre-and post-spontaneous breathing trial (post-SBT), LUS scores were significantly higher in the failed weaning group (14.44 ±2.52 and 18.83 ±3.18 respectively) than in the successful weaning group (11.25 ±3.05 and 12.53 ±3.41 respectively). A ROC analysis for the ability of post-SBT LUS score to predict weaning outcomes revealed a significant AUC of 0.911 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.830-0.992 (P < 0.0001). The best cut-off was 14.5, at which sensitivity and specificity were 88.8% and 68.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Our data suggest that LUS can be used as a predictor of MV weaning outcomes in critically ill adults. A post-SBT LUS score cut-off value of 14.5 has a sensitivity and a specificity of 88.8% and 68.7%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":503219,"journal":{"name":"Benha Medical Journal","volume":"1084 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Lung Ultrasound Predict Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Outcomes in Critically Ill Adults?\",\"authors\":\"Z. Abdelwahab, Ahmed M. Abdelazeem, Ahmed M. Abdelhameed, Enas Mahdy\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/bmfj.2024.255239.1978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to assess the ability of lung ultrasound (LUS) to predict mechanical ventilation (MV) weaning outcomes in critically ill adults. Methods: A prospective observational study that analyzed data collected from 50 adult patients, mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hours and eligible for their first spontaneous breathing trial. A LUS was performed prior to and at the end of a 1-hour SBT. To quantify lung aeration, a LUS score was calculated. Patients were divided into two groups according to their response to weaning trials with group A showing successful weaning while group B showing failed weaning. All included patients were followed up to Intensive Care Unit discharge. Results: Weaning failure was observed in 36% of patients. LUS score showed a significant difference between both groups (P < 0.001). Pre-and post-spontaneous breathing trial (post-SBT), LUS scores were significantly higher in the failed weaning group (14.44 ±2.52 and 18.83 ±3.18 respectively) than in the successful weaning group (11.25 ±3.05 and 12.53 ±3.41 respectively). A ROC analysis for the ability of post-SBT LUS score to predict weaning outcomes revealed a significant AUC of 0.911 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.830-0.992 (P < 0.0001). The best cut-off was 14.5, at which sensitivity and specificity were 88.8% and 68.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Our data suggest that LUS can be used as a predictor of MV weaning outcomes in critically ill adults. A post-SBT LUS score cut-off value of 14.5 has a sensitivity and a specificity of 88.8% and 68.7%, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Benha Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"1084 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Benha Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/bmfj.2024.255239.1978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bmfj.2024.255239.1978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估肺部超声(LUS)预测重症成人机械通气(MV)断流结果的能力。研究方法这是一项前瞻性观察研究,分析了从 50 名机械通气超过 48 小时且符合首次自主呼吸试验条件的成人患者身上收集的数据。在 1 小时的自主呼吸试验之前和结束时进行 LUS。为了量化肺通气情况,计算了 LUS 分数。根据患者对断奶试验的反应将其分为两组,A 组断奶成功,B 组断奶失败。对所有纳入的患者进行随访,直至重症监护室患者出院。结果36%的患者断奶失败。两组患者的 LUS 评分差异显著(P < 0.001)。断奶失败组在自主呼吸试验(SBT 后)前后的 LUS 评分(分别为 14.44 ±2.52 和 18.83 ±3.18)明显高于断奶成功组(分别为 11.25 ±3.05 和 12.53 ±3.41)。对 SBT 后 LUS 评分预测断奶结果能力的 ROC 分析显示,AUC 为 0.911,95% 置信区间为 0.830-0.992(P < 0.0001)。最佳临界值为 14.5,灵敏度和特异度分别为 88.8% 和 68.7%。结论我们的数据表明,LUS 可用作重症成人中压断流结果的预测指标。SBT 后 LUS 评分临界值为 14.5 时,灵敏度和特异度分别为 88.8% 和 68.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can Lung Ultrasound Predict Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Outcomes in Critically Ill Adults?
This study aimed to assess the ability of lung ultrasound (LUS) to predict mechanical ventilation (MV) weaning outcomes in critically ill adults. Methods: A prospective observational study that analyzed data collected from 50 adult patients, mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hours and eligible for their first spontaneous breathing trial. A LUS was performed prior to and at the end of a 1-hour SBT. To quantify lung aeration, a LUS score was calculated. Patients were divided into two groups according to their response to weaning trials with group A showing successful weaning while group B showing failed weaning. All included patients were followed up to Intensive Care Unit discharge. Results: Weaning failure was observed in 36% of patients. LUS score showed a significant difference between both groups (P < 0.001). Pre-and post-spontaneous breathing trial (post-SBT), LUS scores were significantly higher in the failed weaning group (14.44 ±2.52 and 18.83 ±3.18 respectively) than in the successful weaning group (11.25 ±3.05 and 12.53 ±3.41 respectively). A ROC analysis for the ability of post-SBT LUS score to predict weaning outcomes revealed a significant AUC of 0.911 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.830-0.992 (P < 0.0001). The best cut-off was 14.5, at which sensitivity and specificity were 88.8% and 68.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Our data suggest that LUS can be used as a predictor of MV weaning outcomes in critically ill adults. A post-SBT LUS score cut-off value of 14.5 has a sensitivity and a specificity of 88.8% and 68.7%, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease on Health-Related Quality of Life Comparing Fair Control of Hyperglycemia contrary to Intensive Control in Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Procedure Comparison of the Onset Time between 0.25% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ultrasound‑Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Clinical Trial Intramedullary Nailing Versus Minmally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) in Management of Distal Tibial Fractures Correlation between serum estrogen level and endometrial histology in cases of fibroid uterus in peri-menopausal peroid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1