不同居民群体使用城市公共交通系统的便利性:布拉迪斯拉发市案例

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101200
Richard Hluško , Richard Stanek , Pavol Ďurček , Dagmar Kusendová
{"title":"不同居民群体使用城市公共交通系统的便利性:布拉迪斯拉发市案例","authors":"Richard Hluško ,&nbsp;Richard Stanek ,&nbsp;Pavol Ďurček ,&nbsp;Dagmar Kusendová","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The main goal of the article is to characterize the functioning of the Urban Public Transport System (UPTS) in the capital city of the Slovak Republic (Bratislava) during different time periods (morning rush, evening, night, average working day, and weekend − Sunday) and express its accessibility for various groups of city residents (low-income households, unemployed individuals, seniors (age 60+), children (age 0–14), women (for comparison, men as well). To achieve this goal, we combined datasets of UPTS in Bratislava with the pedestrian communication network and identified an effective service area for which we subsequently determined the sizes of the respective population groups of residents. Finally, we verified the functionality of the entire UPTS model by measuring the accessibility of the selected destination, Ružinov Hospital. Our results could be summarized as follows: The functioning of UPTS is very similar during the morning rush, evening, average working day (Monday to Friday), and weekend − Sunday. During these time periods, approximately the same main lines operate, and there is a higher utilization of the same transfer points. The difference lies mainly in the frequency of departures of specific lines. During the night, the system operates based on different lines compared to the daytime, with transfers possible only at one central point/corridor. This fact also affects the usability and accessibility of UPTS, reflected in the accessibility of Ružinov Hospital, which is very limited during the night-time period. However, the accessibility of the hospital by UPTS is higher for the unemployed residents, low-income individuals, and children than the overall residents average, which is also reflected in the distribution of women. A negative aspect is that UPTS is less accessible for seniors. It must be said that this fact varies significantly in the heterogeneous spatial layout of the city. This was confirmed in our measurement of the accessibility to Ružinov Hospital, where seniors have roughly the same level of accessibility as the overall residents average.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24000555/pdfft?md5=fc5054626caf67dedf8fce47abac4260&pid=1-s2.0-S2213624X24000555-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urban public transport system accessibility for different groups of residents: Case of Bratislava city\",\"authors\":\"Richard Hluško ,&nbsp;Richard Stanek ,&nbsp;Pavol Ďurček ,&nbsp;Dagmar Kusendová\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The main goal of the article is to characterize the functioning of the Urban Public Transport System (UPTS) in the capital city of the Slovak Republic (Bratislava) during different time periods (morning rush, evening, night, average working day, and weekend − Sunday) and express its accessibility for various groups of city residents (low-income households, unemployed individuals, seniors (age 60+), children (age 0–14), women (for comparison, men as well). To achieve this goal, we combined datasets of UPTS in Bratislava with the pedestrian communication network and identified an effective service area for which we subsequently determined the sizes of the respective population groups of residents. Finally, we verified the functionality of the entire UPTS model by measuring the accessibility of the selected destination, Ružinov Hospital. Our results could be summarized as follows: The functioning of UPTS is very similar during the morning rush, evening, average working day (Monday to Friday), and weekend − Sunday. During these time periods, approximately the same main lines operate, and there is a higher utilization of the same transfer points. The difference lies mainly in the frequency of departures of specific lines. During the night, the system operates based on different lines compared to the daytime, with transfers possible only at one central point/corridor. This fact also affects the usability and accessibility of UPTS, reflected in the accessibility of Ružinov Hospital, which is very limited during the night-time period. However, the accessibility of the hospital by UPTS is higher for the unemployed residents, low-income individuals, and children than the overall residents average, which is also reflected in the distribution of women. A negative aspect is that UPTS is less accessible for seniors. It must be said that this fact varies significantly in the heterogeneous spatial layout of the city. This was confirmed in our measurement of the accessibility to Ružinov Hospital, where seniors have roughly the same level of accessibility as the overall residents average.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24000555/pdfft?md5=fc5054626caf67dedf8fce47abac4260&pid=1-s2.0-S2213624X24000555-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24000555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24000555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的主要目的是描述斯洛伐克共和国首都(布拉迪斯拉发)城市公共交通系统(UPTS)在不同时间段(早高峰、傍晚、夜间、平均工作日、周末-周日)的运行情况,并表达城市不同居民群体(低收入家庭、失业人员、老年人(60 岁以上)、儿童(0-14 岁)、女性(为便于比较,男性也包括在内)的交通便利程度。为实现这一目标,我们将布拉迪斯拉发城市公共交通服务系统的数据集与行人通信网络相结合,确定了一个有效的服务区域,并随后确定了相应居民群体的规模。最后,我们通过测量所选目的地鲁日诺夫医院的可达性,验证了整个 UPTS 模型的功能。我们的结果可归纳如下:在早高峰、傍晚、平均工作日(周一至周五)和周末-周日,UPTS 的功能非常相似。在这些时间段内,运行的主要线路大致相同,相同换乘点的利用率也较高。不同之处主要在于特定线路的发车频率。与白天相比,夜间的系统运行线路不同,只能在一个中心点/走廊进行换乘。这一事实也影响了 UPTS 的可用性和可达性,反映在 Ružinov 医院的可达性上,夜间的可达性非常有限。不过,失业居民、低收入者和儿童使用 UPTS 前往医院的便利程度要高于总体居民的平均水平,妇女的分布情况也反映了这一点。一个不利的方面是,老年人使用 UPTS 的机会较少。必须指出的是,这一事实在城市不同的空间布局中差异很大。这一点在我们对鲁日诺夫医院可达性的测量中得到了证实,老年人的可达性与总体居民的平均水平大致相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Urban public transport system accessibility for different groups of residents: Case of Bratislava city

The main goal of the article is to characterize the functioning of the Urban Public Transport System (UPTS) in the capital city of the Slovak Republic (Bratislava) during different time periods (morning rush, evening, night, average working day, and weekend − Sunday) and express its accessibility for various groups of city residents (low-income households, unemployed individuals, seniors (age 60+), children (age 0–14), women (for comparison, men as well). To achieve this goal, we combined datasets of UPTS in Bratislava with the pedestrian communication network and identified an effective service area for which we subsequently determined the sizes of the respective population groups of residents. Finally, we verified the functionality of the entire UPTS model by measuring the accessibility of the selected destination, Ružinov Hospital. Our results could be summarized as follows: The functioning of UPTS is very similar during the morning rush, evening, average working day (Monday to Friday), and weekend − Sunday. During these time periods, approximately the same main lines operate, and there is a higher utilization of the same transfer points. The difference lies mainly in the frequency of departures of specific lines. During the night, the system operates based on different lines compared to the daytime, with transfers possible only at one central point/corridor. This fact also affects the usability and accessibility of UPTS, reflected in the accessibility of Ružinov Hospital, which is very limited during the night-time period. However, the accessibility of the hospital by UPTS is higher for the unemployed residents, low-income individuals, and children than the overall residents average, which is also reflected in the distribution of women. A negative aspect is that UPTS is less accessible for seniors. It must be said that this fact varies significantly in the heterogeneous spatial layout of the city. This was confirmed in our measurement of the accessibility to Ružinov Hospital, where seniors have roughly the same level of accessibility as the overall residents average.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
期刊最新文献
Fuelling the pandemic: The impact of fuel prices on COVID-19 COVID-19 and its influence on the propensity to work from home between March 2020 and June 2021 Simulation modeling of passengers flow at airport terminals to reduce delay and enhance level of service Optimization of transport sustainability index to conserve resources: A case study of Delhi, India The effect of airline service quality, perceived value, emotional attachment, and brand loyalty on passengers’ willingness to pay: The moderating role of airline origin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1