我的医生自我和我的人类自我":医生在社交媒体上展现自我的定性研究

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1111/medu.15384
Lauren A. Maggio, Lucía Céspedes, Alice Fleerackers, Regina Royan
{"title":"我的医生自我和我的人类自我\":医生在社交媒体上展现自我的定性研究","authors":"Lauren A. Maggio, Lucía Céspedes, Alice Fleerackers, Regina Royan","doi":"10.1111/medu.15384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionWhen using social media, physicians are encouraged and trained to maintain separate professional and personal identities. However, this separation is difficult and even undesirable, as the blurring of personal and professional online presence can influence patient trust. Thus, it is necessary to develop policies and educational resources that are more responsive to the blurring of personal and professional boundaries on social media. This study aims to provide an understanding of how physicians present themselves holistically online to inform such policies and resources.MethodsTwenty‐eight US‐based physicians who use social media were interviewed. Participants were asked to describe how and why they use social media, specifically Twitter (rebranded as ‘X’ in 2023). Interviews were complemented by data from the participants' Twitter profiles. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis guided by Goffman's dramaturgical model. This model uses the metaphor of a stage to characterise how individuals attempt to control the aspects of the identities—or <jats:italic>faces—</jats:italic>they display during social interactions.ResultsThe participants presented seven faces, which included professionally focused faces (e.g. networker) and those more personal in nature (e.g. human). The participants crafted and maintained these faces through discursive choices in their tweets and profiles, which were motivated by their audience's perceptions. We identified overlaps and tensions at the intersections of these faces, which posed professional and personal challenges for participants.ConclusionsPhysicians strategically emphasise their more professional or personal faces according to their objectives and motivations in different communicative situations, and tailor their language and content to better reach their target audiences. While tensions arise between these faces, physicians still prefer to project a rounded, integral image of themselves on social media. This suggests a need to reconsider social media policies and related educational initiatives to better align with the realities of these digital environments.","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘My doctor self and my human self’: A qualitative study of physicians' presentation of self on social media\",\"authors\":\"Lauren A. Maggio, Lucía Céspedes, Alice Fleerackers, Regina Royan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/medu.15384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionWhen using social media, physicians are encouraged and trained to maintain separate professional and personal identities. However, this separation is difficult and even undesirable, as the blurring of personal and professional online presence can influence patient trust. Thus, it is necessary to develop policies and educational resources that are more responsive to the blurring of personal and professional boundaries on social media. This study aims to provide an understanding of how physicians present themselves holistically online to inform such policies and resources.MethodsTwenty‐eight US‐based physicians who use social media were interviewed. Participants were asked to describe how and why they use social media, specifically Twitter (rebranded as ‘X’ in 2023). Interviews were complemented by data from the participants' Twitter profiles. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis guided by Goffman's dramaturgical model. This model uses the metaphor of a stage to characterise how individuals attempt to control the aspects of the identities—or <jats:italic>faces—</jats:italic>they display during social interactions.ResultsThe participants presented seven faces, which included professionally focused faces (e.g. networker) and those more personal in nature (e.g. human). The participants crafted and maintained these faces through discursive choices in their tweets and profiles, which were motivated by their audience's perceptions. We identified overlaps and tensions at the intersections of these faces, which posed professional and personal challenges for participants.ConclusionsPhysicians strategically emphasise their more professional or personal faces according to their objectives and motivations in different communicative situations, and tailor their language and content to better reach their target audiences. While tensions arise between these faces, physicians still prefer to project a rounded, integral image of themselves on social media. This suggests a need to reconsider social media policies and related educational initiatives to better align with the realities of these digital environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15384\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15384","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言在使用社交媒体时,医生被鼓励并训练保持独立的职业身份和个人身份。然而,这种分离是困难的,甚至是不可取的,因为个人和职业在网上的模糊会影响患者的信任。因此,有必要制定更能应对社交媒体上个人和职业界限模糊问题的政策和教育资源。本研究旨在了解医生如何在网上全面展示自己,从而为此类政策和资源提供参考。方法对 28 名使用社交媒体的美国医生进行了访谈。受访者被要求描述他们如何以及为何使用社交媒体,特别是 Twitter(2023 年更名为 "X")。参与者的推特资料对访谈进行了补充。在戈夫曼戏剧模式的指导下,我们使用反思性主题分析法对数据进行了分析。该模型以舞台为隐喻,描述了个人如何试图控制他们在社交互动中展示的身份或面孔的各个方面。结果参与者展示了七张面孔,其中包括以专业为重点的面孔(如网络工作者)和更具个人特色的面孔(如人类)。参与者通过在推文和个人简介中的话语选择来塑造和维持这些面孔,而这些话语选择的动机是受众的看法。我们在这些面孔的交汇处发现了重叠和紧张,这给参与者带来了专业和个人方面的挑战。结论医生在不同的交际场合根据自己的目标和动机,有策略地强调自己的专业或个人面孔,并调整自己的语言和内容,以更好地接触目标受众。虽然这两种面孔之间会产生矛盾,但医生们还是更愿意在社交媒体上展示自己全面、完整的形象。这表明有必要重新考虑社交媒体政策和相关教育措施,以便更好地适应这些数字环境的现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘My doctor self and my human self’: A qualitative study of physicians' presentation of self on social media
IntroductionWhen using social media, physicians are encouraged and trained to maintain separate professional and personal identities. However, this separation is difficult and even undesirable, as the blurring of personal and professional online presence can influence patient trust. Thus, it is necessary to develop policies and educational resources that are more responsive to the blurring of personal and professional boundaries on social media. This study aims to provide an understanding of how physicians present themselves holistically online to inform such policies and resources.MethodsTwenty‐eight US‐based physicians who use social media were interviewed. Participants were asked to describe how and why they use social media, specifically Twitter (rebranded as ‘X’ in 2023). Interviews were complemented by data from the participants' Twitter profiles. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis guided by Goffman's dramaturgical model. This model uses the metaphor of a stage to characterise how individuals attempt to control the aspects of the identities—or faces—they display during social interactions.ResultsThe participants presented seven faces, which included professionally focused faces (e.g. networker) and those more personal in nature (e.g. human). The participants crafted and maintained these faces through discursive choices in their tweets and profiles, which were motivated by their audience's perceptions. We identified overlaps and tensions at the intersections of these faces, which posed professional and personal challenges for participants.ConclusionsPhysicians strategically emphasise their more professional or personal faces according to their objectives and motivations in different communicative situations, and tailor their language and content to better reach their target audiences. While tensions arise between these faces, physicians still prefer to project a rounded, integral image of themselves on social media. This suggests a need to reconsider social media policies and related educational initiatives to better align with the realities of these digital environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
Being the supervisor: A duo-ethnographic exploration of social justice in postgraduate health professions education. Epistemic injustice: The hidden vulnerability of medicine. Fostering the clinician as teacher: A realist review. Issue Information August in this issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1