Rodrigo Pommot Berto, Hanna Bugler, Gabriel Dias, Mateus Oliveira, Lucas Ueda, Sergio Dertkigil, Paula D. P. Costa, Leticia Rittner, Julian P. Merkofer, Dennis M. J. van de Sande, Sina Amirrajab, Gerhard S. Drenthen, Mitko Veta, Jacobus F. A. Jansen, Marcel Breeuwer, Ruud J. G. van Sloun, Abdul Qayyum, Cristobal Rodero, Steven Niederer, Roberto Souza, Ashley D. Harris
{"title":"减少 GABA 编辑 MRS 采集时间的 2023 ISBI 挑战赛结果","authors":"Rodrigo Pommot Berto, Hanna Bugler, Gabriel Dias, Mateus Oliveira, Lucas Ueda, Sergio Dertkigil, Paula D. P. Costa, Leticia Rittner, Julian P. Merkofer, Dennis M. J. van de Sande, Sina Amirrajab, Gerhard S. Drenthen, Mitko Veta, Jacobus F. A. Jansen, Marcel Breeuwer, Ruud J. G. van Sloun, Abdul Qayyum, Cristobal Rodero, Steven Niederer, Roberto Souza, Ashley D. Harris","doi":"10.1007/s10334-024-01156-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Use a conference challenge format to compare machine learning-based gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) reconstruction models using one-quarter of the transients typically acquired during a complete scan.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>There were three tracks: Track 1: simulated data, Track 2: identical acquisition parameters with in vivo data, and Track 3: different acquisition parameters with in vivo data. The mean squared error, signal-to-noise ratio, linewidth, and a proposed shape score metric were used to quantify model performance. Challenge organizers provided open access to a baseline model, simulated noise-free data, guides for adding synthetic noise, and in vivo data.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Three submissions were compared. A covariance matrix convolutional neural network model was most successful for Track 1. A vision transformer model operating on a spectrogram data representation was most successful for Tracks 2 and 3. Deep learning (DL) reconstructions with 80 transients achieved equivalent or better SNR, linewidth and fit error compared to conventional 320 transient reconstructions. However, some DL models optimized linewidth and SNR without actually improving overall spectral quality, indicating a need for more robust metrics.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>DL-based reconstruction pipelines have the promise to reduce the number of transients required for GABA-edited MRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18067,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of the 2023 ISBI challenge to reduce GABA-edited MRS acquisition time\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Pommot Berto, Hanna Bugler, Gabriel Dias, Mateus Oliveira, Lucas Ueda, Sergio Dertkigil, Paula D. P. Costa, Leticia Rittner, Julian P. Merkofer, Dennis M. J. van de Sande, Sina Amirrajab, Gerhard S. Drenthen, Mitko Veta, Jacobus F. A. Jansen, Marcel Breeuwer, Ruud J. G. van Sloun, Abdul Qayyum, Cristobal Rodero, Steven Niederer, Roberto Souza, Ashley D. Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10334-024-01156-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>Use a conference challenge format to compare machine learning-based gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) reconstruction models using one-quarter of the transients typically acquired during a complete scan.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>There were three tracks: Track 1: simulated data, Track 2: identical acquisition parameters with in vivo data, and Track 3: different acquisition parameters with in vivo data. The mean squared error, signal-to-noise ratio, linewidth, and a proposed shape score metric were used to quantify model performance. Challenge organizers provided open access to a baseline model, simulated noise-free data, guides for adding synthetic noise, and in vivo data.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Three submissions were compared. A covariance matrix convolutional neural network model was most successful for Track 1. A vision transformer model operating on a spectrogram data representation was most successful for Tracks 2 and 3. Deep learning (DL) reconstructions with 80 transients achieved equivalent or better SNR, linewidth and fit error compared to conventional 320 transient reconstructions. However, some DL models optimized linewidth and SNR without actually improving overall spectral quality, indicating a need for more robust metrics.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>DL-based reconstruction pipelines have the promise to reduce the number of transients required for GABA-edited MRS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-024-01156-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-024-01156-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Results of the 2023 ISBI challenge to reduce GABA-edited MRS acquisition time
Purpose
Use a conference challenge format to compare machine learning-based gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) reconstruction models using one-quarter of the transients typically acquired during a complete scan.
Methods
There were three tracks: Track 1: simulated data, Track 2: identical acquisition parameters with in vivo data, and Track 3: different acquisition parameters with in vivo data. The mean squared error, signal-to-noise ratio, linewidth, and a proposed shape score metric were used to quantify model performance. Challenge organizers provided open access to a baseline model, simulated noise-free data, guides for adding synthetic noise, and in vivo data.
Results
Three submissions were compared. A covariance matrix convolutional neural network model was most successful for Track 1. A vision transformer model operating on a spectrogram data representation was most successful for Tracks 2 and 3. Deep learning (DL) reconstructions with 80 transients achieved equivalent or better SNR, linewidth and fit error compared to conventional 320 transient reconstructions. However, some DL models optimized linewidth and SNR without actually improving overall spectral quality, indicating a need for more robust metrics.
Conclusion
DL-based reconstruction pipelines have the promise to reduce the number of transients required for GABA-edited MRS.
期刊介绍:
MAGMA is a multidisciplinary international journal devoted to the publication of articles on all aspects of magnetic resonance techniques and their applications in medicine and biology. MAGMA currently publishes research papers, reviews, letters to the editor, and commentaries, six times a year. The subject areas covered by MAGMA include:
advances in materials, hardware and software in magnetic resonance technology,
new developments and results in research and practical applications of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy related to biology and medicine,
study of animal models and intact cells using magnetic resonance,
reports of clinical trials on humans and clinical validation of magnetic resonance protocols.