包括非参数回归测试

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Econometric Theory Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1017/s0266466624000100
Elia Lapenta, Pascal Lavergne
{"title":"包括非参数回归测试","authors":"Elia Lapenta, Pascal Lavergne","doi":"10.1017/s0266466624000100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We set up a formal framework to characterize encompassing of nonparametric models through the <jats:inline-formula> <jats:alternatives> <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" mime-subtype=\"png\" xlink:href=\"S0266466624000100_inline1.png\" /> <jats:tex-math> $L^2$ </jats:tex-math> </jats:alternatives> </jats:inline-formula> distance. We contrast it to previous literature on the comparison of nonparametric regression models. We then develop testing procedures for the encompassing hypothesis that are fully nonparametric. Our test statistics depend on kernel regression, raising the issue of bandwidth’s choice. We investigate two alternative approaches to obtain a “small bias property” for our test statistics. We show the validity of a wild bootstrap method. We empirically study the use of a data-driven bandwidth and illustrate the attractive features of our tests for small and moderate samples.","PeriodicalId":49275,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Theory","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ENCOMPASSING TESTS FOR NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSIONS\",\"authors\":\"Elia Lapenta, Pascal Lavergne\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0266466624000100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We set up a formal framework to characterize encompassing of nonparametric models through the <jats:inline-formula> <jats:alternatives> <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\" mime-subtype=\\\"png\\\" xlink:href=\\\"S0266466624000100_inline1.png\\\" /> <jats:tex-math> $L^2$ </jats:tex-math> </jats:alternatives> </jats:inline-formula> distance. We contrast it to previous literature on the comparison of nonparametric regression models. We then develop testing procedures for the encompassing hypothesis that are fully nonparametric. Our test statistics depend on kernel regression, raising the issue of bandwidth’s choice. We investigate two alternative approaches to obtain a “small bias property” for our test statistics. We show the validity of a wild bootstrap method. We empirically study the use of a data-driven bandwidth and illustrate the attractive features of our tests for small and moderate samples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometric Theory\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometric Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466624000100\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466624000100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们建立了一个正式框架,通过 $L^2$ 距离来描述非参数模型的包含性。我们将其与之前关于非参数回归模型比较的文献进行对比。然后,我们开发了完全非参数的包含假设检验程序。我们的检验统计依赖于核回归,这就提出了带宽选择的问题。我们研究了两种替代方法,以获得检验统计量的 "小偏差属性"。我们证明了野生引导法的有效性。我们对数据驱动带宽的使用进行了实证研究,并说明了我们的检验对小样本和中等样本的吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ENCOMPASSING TESTS FOR NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSIONS
We set up a formal framework to characterize encompassing of nonparametric models through the $L^2$ distance. We contrast it to previous literature on the comparison of nonparametric regression models. We then develop testing procedures for the encompassing hypothesis that are fully nonparametric. Our test statistics depend on kernel regression, raising the issue of bandwidth’s choice. We investigate two alternative approaches to obtain a “small bias property” for our test statistics. We show the validity of a wild bootstrap method. We empirically study the use of a data-driven bandwidth and illustrate the attractive features of our tests for small and moderate samples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Econometric Theory
Econometric Theory MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception, Econometric Theory has aimed to endow econometrics with an innovative journal dedicated to advance theoretical research in econometrics. It provides a centralized professional outlet for original theoretical contributions in all of the major areas of econometrics, and all fields of research in econometric theory fall within the scope of ET. In addition, ET fosters the multidisciplinary features of econometrics that extend beyond economics. Particularly welcome are articles that promote original econometric research in relation to mathematical finance, stochastic processes, statistics, and probability theory, as well as computationally intensive areas of economics such as modern industrial organization and dynamic macroeconomics.
期刊最新文献
INFERENCE IN MILDLY EXPLOSIVE AUTOREGRESSIONS UNDER UNCONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY EFFICIENCY IN ESTIMATION UNDER MONOTONIC ATTRITION WELFARE ANALYSIS VIA MARGINAL TREATMENT EFFECTS APPLICATIONS OF FUNCTIONAL DEPENDENCE TO SPATIAL ECONOMETRICS IDENTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL DECISION THEORY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1