使用 YOLOv4 和深度 SORT 算法估算行人在过街路口的行走速度:原理验证

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104292
Hamed Ghomashchi , Jakson Paterson , Alison C. Novak , Tilak Dutta
{"title":"使用 YOLOv4 和深度 SORT 算法估算行人在过街路口的行走速度:原理验证","authors":"Hamed Ghomashchi ,&nbsp;Jakson Paterson ,&nbsp;Alison C. Novak ,&nbsp;Tilak Dutta","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is evidence that existing standards for signal timing do not provide enough time for many pedestrians to safely cross intersections. Yet, current methods for studying this problem rely on inefficient manual observations. The objective of this work was to determine if the YOLOv4 and Deep SORT computer vision algorithms have the potential to be incorporated into automated measurement systems to measure and compare pedestrian walking speeds at one-stage and two-stage street crossings captured in birds-eye-view video. Walking speed was estimated for 1018 pedestrians at single-stage (591 pedestrians) and two-stage (427 pedestrians) street crossings. Pedestrians in the one-stage crossing were found to be significantly slower than pedestrians who crossed the two-stage crossing in one signal (<em>1.19 ± 0.50 vs. 1.31 ± 0.</em>49 m/s<em>, p &lt; 0.001</em>). This proof of principle study demonstrated that the YOLOv4 and Deep SORT approaches are promising for estimating pedestrian walking speed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 104292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687024000693/pdfft?md5=fb145fb1c5e98b5270b08ddbbe8af82f&pid=1-s2.0-S0003687024000693-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating pedestrian walking speed at street crossings using the YOLOv4 and deep SORT algorithms: Proof of principle\",\"authors\":\"Hamed Ghomashchi ,&nbsp;Jakson Paterson ,&nbsp;Alison C. Novak ,&nbsp;Tilak Dutta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is evidence that existing standards for signal timing do not provide enough time for many pedestrians to safely cross intersections. Yet, current methods for studying this problem rely on inefficient manual observations. The objective of this work was to determine if the YOLOv4 and Deep SORT computer vision algorithms have the potential to be incorporated into automated measurement systems to measure and compare pedestrian walking speeds at one-stage and two-stage street crossings captured in birds-eye-view video. Walking speed was estimated for 1018 pedestrians at single-stage (591 pedestrians) and two-stage (427 pedestrians) street crossings. Pedestrians in the one-stage crossing were found to be significantly slower than pedestrians who crossed the two-stage crossing in one signal (<em>1.19 ± 0.50 vs. 1.31 ± 0.</em>49 m/s<em>, p &lt; 0.001</em>). This proof of principle study demonstrated that the YOLOv4 and Deep SORT approaches are promising for estimating pedestrian walking speed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687024000693/pdfft?md5=fb145fb1c5e98b5270b08ddbbe8af82f&pid=1-s2.0-S0003687024000693-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687024000693\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687024000693","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有证据表明,现有的信号配时标准无法为许多行人提供足够的时间安全通过交叉路口。然而,目前研究这一问题的方法依赖于效率低下的人工观察。这项工作的目的是确定 YOLOv4 和 Deep SORT 计算机视觉算法是否有潜力融入自动测量系统,以测量和比较鸟瞰视频中捕捉到的一段式和两段式过街行人的步行速度。在单级(591 名行人)和双级(427 名行人)过街处,对 1018 名行人的步行速度进行了估算。结果发现,单段式过街行人的步行速度明显低于在一个信号灯下通过双段式过街的行人(1.19 ± 0.50 vs. 1.31 ± 0.49 m/s,p <0.001)。这项原理验证研究表明,YOLOv4 和 Deep SORT 方法在估算行人步行速度方面大有可为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating pedestrian walking speed at street crossings using the YOLOv4 and deep SORT algorithms: Proof of principle

There is evidence that existing standards for signal timing do not provide enough time for many pedestrians to safely cross intersections. Yet, current methods for studying this problem rely on inefficient manual observations. The objective of this work was to determine if the YOLOv4 and Deep SORT computer vision algorithms have the potential to be incorporated into automated measurement systems to measure and compare pedestrian walking speeds at one-stage and two-stage street crossings captured in birds-eye-view video. Walking speed was estimated for 1018 pedestrians at single-stage (591 pedestrians) and two-stage (427 pedestrians) street crossings. Pedestrians in the one-stage crossing were found to be significantly slower than pedestrians who crossed the two-stage crossing in one signal (1.19 ± 0.50 vs. 1.31 ± 0.49 m/s, p < 0.001). This proof of principle study demonstrated that the YOLOv4 and Deep SORT approaches are promising for estimating pedestrian walking speed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Characterising the physical and physiological demands of essential tasks across the Australian Army What is buzzing around me? Assessing the influence of indoor unmanned aerial vehicles on human cognitive performance and well-being Developing and validating a Chinese human-automation trust scale: Advancing trust measurement of emerging automation in sustainable ergonomics Experimental Investigation of the Efficacy of Preemptive Tilting Seats in mitigating Carsickness Muscle coactivation changes following a fatiguing overhead drilling task: Implications for subacromial impingement syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1