在协作式在线国际学习中设计形成性反馈

IF 1.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT Human systems management Pub Date : 2024-04-06 DOI:10.3233/hsm-230100
M. Altmann, Maik Arnold
{"title":"在协作式在线国际学习中设计形成性反馈","authors":"M. Altmann, Maik Arnold","doi":"10.3233/hsm-230100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The adequate delivery of formative feedback in higher education is vigorously discussed to support the development of students’ learning activities. Most of the literature refers to individual feedback to students in the context of web-based training and teaching in higher education. However, concrete design recommendations are scarce, especially regarding collaborative online international learning modules. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to identify and systematize the need for formative feedback from students in Virtual Exchange modules and concludes with implications for the design of formative feedback activities. METHODS: The research employs a two-step sequential explorative mixed methods and longitudinal approach. A quantitative pre-test is followed by a qualitative self-reflective journal survey with two data collection dates using a thematic co-occurrence analysis. RESULTS: Based on 11 abductively coded themes, findings include the effects of agents on students and barriers and prerequisites for implementing formative Feedback in COIL modules. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of feedback can vary depending on the agent. While e-tutors need to build trust and give orientation, teachers support reflection, and peers affect motivation. Applicable and quick responses are fundamental for a positive perception of formative feedback. Peer feedback can potentially improve learning and reduce the teacher’s workload.","PeriodicalId":13113,"journal":{"name":"Human systems management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing formative feedback in collaborative online international learning\",\"authors\":\"M. Altmann, Maik Arnold\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/hsm-230100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: The adequate delivery of formative feedback in higher education is vigorously discussed to support the development of students’ learning activities. Most of the literature refers to individual feedback to students in the context of web-based training and teaching in higher education. However, concrete design recommendations are scarce, especially regarding collaborative online international learning modules. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to identify and systematize the need for formative feedback from students in Virtual Exchange modules and concludes with implications for the design of formative feedback activities. METHODS: The research employs a two-step sequential explorative mixed methods and longitudinal approach. A quantitative pre-test is followed by a qualitative self-reflective journal survey with two data collection dates using a thematic co-occurrence analysis. RESULTS: Based on 11 abductively coded themes, findings include the effects of agents on students and barriers and prerequisites for implementing formative Feedback in COIL modules. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of feedback can vary depending on the agent. While e-tutors need to build trust and give orientation, teachers support reflection, and peers affect motivation. Applicable and quick responses are fundamental for a positive perception of formative feedback. Peer feedback can potentially improve learning and reduce the teacher’s workload.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human systems management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human systems management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/hsm-230100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human systems management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/hsm-230100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了支持学生学习活动的发展,高等教育中充分提供形成性反馈的问题得到了热烈讨论。大多数文献都提到了高等教育中基于网络的培训和教学中对学生的个别反馈。然而,具体的设计建议却很少,尤其是在协作式在线国际学习模块方面。目的:本文旨在确定和系统化虚拟交流模块中学生形成性反馈的需求,并总结形成性反馈活动设计的意义。方法:研究采用了两步顺序探索混合方法和纵向方法。在定量预测试之后进行定性自我反思日志调查,采用主题共现分析法在两个数据收集日期进行数据收集。结果:基于 11 个归纳编码的主题,研究结果包括代理对学生的影响以及在 COIL 模块中实施形成性反馈的障碍和先决条件。结论:反馈的效果会因代理的不同而不同。电子辅导员需要建立信任并给予引导,而教师则需要支持反思,同伴则会影响学习动机。适用和快速的回应是形成性反馈产生积极影响的基础。同伴反馈有可能改善学习效果,减轻教师的工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing formative feedback in collaborative online international learning
BACKGROUND: The adequate delivery of formative feedback in higher education is vigorously discussed to support the development of students’ learning activities. Most of the literature refers to individual feedback to students in the context of web-based training and teaching in higher education. However, concrete design recommendations are scarce, especially regarding collaborative online international learning modules. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to identify and systematize the need for formative feedback from students in Virtual Exchange modules and concludes with implications for the design of formative feedback activities. METHODS: The research employs a two-step sequential explorative mixed methods and longitudinal approach. A quantitative pre-test is followed by a qualitative self-reflective journal survey with two data collection dates using a thematic co-occurrence analysis. RESULTS: Based on 11 abductively coded themes, findings include the effects of agents on students and barriers and prerequisites for implementing formative Feedback in COIL modules. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of feedback can vary depending on the agent. While e-tutors need to build trust and give orientation, teachers support reflection, and peers affect motivation. Applicable and quick responses are fundamental for a positive perception of formative feedback. Peer feedback can potentially improve learning and reduce the teacher’s workload.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
30.40%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Human Systems Management (HSM) is an interdisciplinary, international, refereed journal, offering applicable, scientific insight into reinventing business, civil-society and government organizations, through the sustainable development of high-technology processes and structures. Adhering to the highest civic, ethical and moral ideals, the journal promotes the emerging anthropocentric-sociocentric paradigm of societal human systems, rather than the pervasively mechanistic and organismic or medieval corporatism views of humankind’s recent past. Intentionality and scope Their management autonomy, capability, culture, mastery, processes, purposefulness, skills, structure and technology often determine which human organizations truly are societal systems, while others are not. HSM seeks to help transform human organizations into true societal systems, free of bureaucratic ills, along two essential, inseparable, yet complementary aspects of modern management: a) the management of societal human systems: the mastery, science and technology of management, including self management, striving for strategic, business and functional effectiveness, efficiency and productivity, through high quality and high technology, i.e., the capabilities and competences that only truly societal human systems create and use, and b) the societal human systems management: the enabling of human beings to form creative teams, communities and societies through autonomy, mastery and purposefulness, on both a personal and a collegial level, while catalyzing people’s creative, inventive and innovative potential, as people participate in corporate-, business- and functional-level decisions. Appreciably large is the gulf between the innovative ideas that world-class societal human systems create and use, and what some conventional business journals offer. The latter often pertain to already refuted practices, while outmoded business-school curricula reinforce this problematic situation.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting the change curve: A rigorous examination and three case studies prompting a re-evaluation of a timeless concept The influence of leadership on organizational performance through work-from-home outcomes under COVID-19 crisis in Thailand Effects of COVID-19 on accounting professionals’ job behaviors, focusing on the moderating effect of organizational communication Construction and application of a core competitiveness evaluation index system for public health personnel training based on the CIPP model A Bibliometric Lens on the Future: How AI continues to transform education institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1