母亲和父亲的敏感性:通过荟萃分析研究儿童依恋安全的关键决定因素。

IF 17.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Psychological bulletin Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1037/bul0000433
Sheri Madigan, Audrey-Ann Deneault, Robbie Duschinsky, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Carlo Schuengel, Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Anh Ly, R M Pasco Fearon, Rachel Eirich, Marije L Verhage
{"title":"母亲和父亲的敏感性:通过荟萃分析研究儿童依恋安全的关键决定因素。","authors":"Sheri Madigan, Audrey-Ann Deneault, Robbie Duschinsky, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Carlo Schuengel, Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Anh Ly, R M Pasco Fearon, Rachel Eirich, Marije L Verhage","doi":"10.1037/bul0000433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sensitive caregiving behavior, which involves the ability to notice, interpret, and quickly respond to a child's signals of need and/or interest, is a central determinant of secure child-caregiver attachment. Yet, significant heterogeneity in effect sizes exists across the literature, and sources of heterogeneity have yet to be explained. For all child-caregiver dyads, there was a significant and positive pooled association between caregiver sensitivity and parent-child attachment (<i>r</i> = .25, 95% CI [.22, .28], <i>k</i> = 174, 230 effect sizes, <i>N</i> = 22,914). We also found a positive association between maternal sensitivity and child attachment security (<i>r</i> = .26, 95% CI [.22, .29], <i>k</i> = 159, 202 effect sizes, <i>N</i> = 21,483), which was equivalent in magnitude to paternal sensitivity and child attachment security (<i>r</i> = .21, 95% CI [.14, 27], <i>k</i> = 22, 23 effect sizes, <i>N</i> = 1,626). Maternal sensitivity was also negatively associated with all three classifications of insecure attachment (avoidant: <i>k</i> = 43, <i>r</i> = -.24 [-.34, -.13]; resistant: <i>k</i> = 43, <i>r</i> = -.12 [-.19, -.06]; disorganized: <i>k</i> = 24, <i>r</i> = -.19 [-.27, -.11]). For maternal sensitivity, associations were larger in studies that used the Attachment Q-Sort (vs. the Strange Situation), used the Maternal Behavior Q-Sort (vs. Ainsworth or Emotional Availability Scales), had strong (vs. poor) interrater measurement reliability, had a longer observation of sensitivity, and had less time elapse between assessments. For paternal sensitivity, associations were larger in older (vs. younger) fathers and children. These findings confirm the importance of both maternal and paternal sensitivity for the development of child attachment security and add understanding of the methodological and substantive factors that allow this effect to be observed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"839-872"},"PeriodicalIF":17.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal and paternal sensitivity: Key determinants of child attachment security examined through meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sheri Madigan, Audrey-Ann Deneault, Robbie Duschinsky, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Carlo Schuengel, Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Anh Ly, R M Pasco Fearon, Rachel Eirich, Marije L Verhage\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/bul0000433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sensitive caregiving behavior, which involves the ability to notice, interpret, and quickly respond to a child's signals of need and/or interest, is a central determinant of secure child-caregiver attachment. Yet, significant heterogeneity in effect sizes exists across the literature, and sources of heterogeneity have yet to be explained. For all child-caregiver dyads, there was a significant and positive pooled association between caregiver sensitivity and parent-child attachment (<i>r</i> = .25, 95% CI [.22, .28], <i>k</i> = 174, 230 effect sizes, <i>N</i> = 22,914). We also found a positive association between maternal sensitivity and child attachment security (<i>r</i> = .26, 95% CI [.22, .29], <i>k</i> = 159, 202 effect sizes, <i>N</i> = 21,483), which was equivalent in magnitude to paternal sensitivity and child attachment security (<i>r</i> = .21, 95% CI [.14, 27], <i>k</i> = 22, 23 effect sizes, <i>N</i> = 1,626). Maternal sensitivity was also negatively associated with all three classifications of insecure attachment (avoidant: <i>k</i> = 43, <i>r</i> = -.24 [-.34, -.13]; resistant: <i>k</i> = 43, <i>r</i> = -.12 [-.19, -.06]; disorganized: <i>k</i> = 24, <i>r</i> = -.19 [-.27, -.11]). For maternal sensitivity, associations were larger in studies that used the Attachment Q-Sort (vs. the Strange Situation), used the Maternal Behavior Q-Sort (vs. Ainsworth or Emotional Availability Scales), had strong (vs. poor) interrater measurement reliability, had a longer observation of sensitivity, and had less time elapse between assessments. For paternal sensitivity, associations were larger in older (vs. younger) fathers and children. These findings confirm the importance of both maternal and paternal sensitivity for the development of child attachment security and add understanding of the methodological and substantive factors that allow this effect to be observed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"839-872\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000433\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000433","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

敏感的照料行为涉及到注意、解读和快速回应儿童需求和/或兴趣信号的能力,是儿童与照料者安全依恋关系的核心决定因素。然而,各种文献中的效应大小存在着明显的异质性,而异质性的来源尚待解释。在所有儿童-照料者二元组合中,照料者敏感性与亲子依恋之间存在显著的正相关(r = .25,95% CI [.22, .28],k = 174,230 个效应大小,N = 22,914 人)。我们还发现,母亲敏感性与儿童依恋安全感之间存在正相关(r = .26,95% CI [.22, .29],k = 159,202 个效应量,N = 21,483 ),其程度与父亲敏感性与儿童依恋安全感之间的正相关(r = .21,95% CI [.14, 27],k = 22,23 个效应量,N = 1,626)相当。母亲的敏感性也与所有三种不安全依恋分类呈负相关(回避型:k = 43,r = -.24 [-.34,-.13];抗拒型:k = 43,r = -.12 [-.19,-.06];无组织型:k = 24,r = -.19 [-.27,-.11])。对于母亲的敏感性,使用依恋 Q-分类法(与陌生情境法相比)、使用母亲行为 Q-分类法(与安斯沃斯量表或情感可得性量表相比)、互测可靠性强(与互测可靠性差相比)、敏感性观察时间较长、评估间隔时间较短的研究的相关性更大。就父亲的敏感性而言,年龄较大(与较小)的父亲和子女的相关性更大。这些研究结果证实了母亲和父亲的敏感性对儿童依恋安全感发展的重要性,并增加了对能够观察到这种效应的方法和实质因素的理解。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maternal and paternal sensitivity: Key determinants of child attachment security examined through meta-analysis.

Sensitive caregiving behavior, which involves the ability to notice, interpret, and quickly respond to a child's signals of need and/or interest, is a central determinant of secure child-caregiver attachment. Yet, significant heterogeneity in effect sizes exists across the literature, and sources of heterogeneity have yet to be explained. For all child-caregiver dyads, there was a significant and positive pooled association between caregiver sensitivity and parent-child attachment (r = .25, 95% CI [.22, .28], k = 174, 230 effect sizes, N = 22,914). We also found a positive association between maternal sensitivity and child attachment security (r = .26, 95% CI [.22, .29], k = 159, 202 effect sizes, N = 21,483), which was equivalent in magnitude to paternal sensitivity and child attachment security (r = .21, 95% CI [.14, 27], k = 22, 23 effect sizes, N = 1,626). Maternal sensitivity was also negatively associated with all three classifications of insecure attachment (avoidant: k = 43, r = -.24 [-.34, -.13]; resistant: k = 43, r = -.12 [-.19, -.06]; disorganized: k = 24, r = -.19 [-.27, -.11]). For maternal sensitivity, associations were larger in studies that used the Attachment Q-Sort (vs. the Strange Situation), used the Maternal Behavior Q-Sort (vs. Ainsworth or Emotional Availability Scales), had strong (vs. poor) interrater measurement reliability, had a longer observation of sensitivity, and had less time elapse between assessments. For paternal sensitivity, associations were larger in older (vs. younger) fathers and children. These findings confirm the importance of both maternal and paternal sensitivity for the development of child attachment security and add understanding of the methodological and substantive factors that allow this effect to be observed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological bulletin
Psychological bulletin 医学-心理学
CiteScore
33.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Psychological Bulletin publishes syntheses of research in scientific psychology. Research syntheses seek to summarize past research by drawing overall conclusions from many separate investigations that address related or identical hypotheses. A research synthesis typically presents the authors' assessments: -of the state of knowledge concerning the relations of interest; -of critical assessments of the strengths and weaknesses in past research; -of important issues that research has left unresolved, thereby directing future research so it can yield a maximum amount of new information.
期刊最新文献
Reporting bias, not external focus: A robust Bayesian meta-analysis and systematic review of the external focus of attention literature. Supporting the status quo is weakly associated with subjective well-being: A comparison of the palliative function of ideology across social status groups using a meta-analytic approach. When connecting with LGBTQ+ communities helps and why it does: A meta-analysis of the relationship between connectedness and health-related outcomes. Who am I? A second-order meta-analytic review of correlates of the self in childhood and adolescence. Defining social reward: A systematic review of human and animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1