James W. Dias, Carolyn M. McClaskey, April P. Alvey, Abigail Lawson, Lois J. Matthews, Judy R. Dubno, Kelly C. Harris
{"title":"年龄和噪音暴露史对听觉神经反应振幅的影响:系统回顾、研究和荟萃分析","authors":"James W. Dias, Carolyn M. McClaskey, April P. Alvey, Abigail Lawson, Lois J. Matthews, Judy R. Dubno, Kelly C. Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2024.109010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Auditory nerve (AN) function has been hypothesized to deteriorate with age and noise exposure. Here, we perform a systematic review of published studies and find that the evidence for age-related deficits in AN function is largely consistent across the literature, but there are inconsistent findings among studies of noise exposure history. Further, evidence from animal studies suggests that the greatest deficits in AN response amplitudes are found in noise-exposed aged mice, but a test of the interaction between effects of age and noise exposure on AN function has not been conducted in humans. We report a study of our own examining differences in the response amplitude of the compound action potential N1 (CAP N1) between younger and older adults with and without a self-reported history of noise exposure in a large sample of human participants (63 younger adults 18–30 years of age, 103 older adults 50–86 years of age). CAP N1 response amplitudes were smaller in older than younger adults. Noise exposure history did not appear to predict CAP N1 response amplitudes, nor did the effect of noise exposure history interact with age. We then incorporated our results into two meta-analyses of published studies of age and noise exposure history effects on AN response amplitudes in neurotypical human samples. The meta-analyses found that age effects across studies are robust (<em>r</em> = -0.407), but noise exposure effects are weak (<em>r</em> = -0.152). We conclude that noise exposure effects may be highly variable depending on sample characteristics, study design, and statistical approach, and researchers should be cautious when interpreting results. The underlying pathology of age-related and noise-induced changes in AN function are difficult to determine in living humans, creating a need for longitudinal studies of changes in AN function across the lifespan and histological examination of the AN from temporal bones collected post-mortem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"447 ","pages":"Article 109010"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of age and noise exposure history on auditory nerve response amplitudes: A systematic review, study, and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"James W. Dias, Carolyn M. McClaskey, April P. Alvey, Abigail Lawson, Lois J. Matthews, Judy R. Dubno, Kelly C. Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heares.2024.109010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Auditory nerve (AN) function has been hypothesized to deteriorate with age and noise exposure. Here, we perform a systematic review of published studies and find that the evidence for age-related deficits in AN function is largely consistent across the literature, but there are inconsistent findings among studies of noise exposure history. Further, evidence from animal studies suggests that the greatest deficits in AN response amplitudes are found in noise-exposed aged mice, but a test of the interaction between effects of age and noise exposure on AN function has not been conducted in humans. We report a study of our own examining differences in the response amplitude of the compound action potential N1 (CAP N1) between younger and older adults with and without a self-reported history of noise exposure in a large sample of human participants (63 younger adults 18–30 years of age, 103 older adults 50–86 years of age). CAP N1 response amplitudes were smaller in older than younger adults. Noise exposure history did not appear to predict CAP N1 response amplitudes, nor did the effect of noise exposure history interact with age. We then incorporated our results into two meta-analyses of published studies of age and noise exposure history effects on AN response amplitudes in neurotypical human samples. The meta-analyses found that age effects across studies are robust (<em>r</em> = -0.407), but noise exposure effects are weak (<em>r</em> = -0.152). We conclude that noise exposure effects may be highly variable depending on sample characteristics, study design, and statistical approach, and researchers should be cautious when interpreting results. The underlying pathology of age-related and noise-induced changes in AN function are difficult to determine in living humans, creating a need for longitudinal studies of changes in AN function across the lifespan and histological examination of the AN from temporal bones collected post-mortem.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\"447 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524000637\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524000637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
据推测,听觉神经(AN)功能会随着年龄的增长和噪声暴露而退化。在此,我们对已发表的研究进行了系统回顾,发现与年龄相关的听觉神经功能缺陷的证据在文献中基本一致,但关于噪声暴露史的研究结果却不一致。此外,来自动物实验的证据表明,暴露于噪声的老年小鼠的自律神经功能反应幅度的缺陷最大,但在人类中还没有进行过年龄和噪声暴露对自律神经功能影响的交互作用测试。我们报告了自己的一项研究,在一个大样本人类参与者(63 名年龄在 18-30 岁的年轻人,103 名年龄在 50-86 岁的老年人)中,检测了有和没有自我报告噪声暴露史的年轻人和老年人之间复合动作电位 N1(CAP N1)反应幅度的差异。老年人的 CAP N1 反应振幅小于年轻人。噪声暴露史似乎并不能预测 CAP N1 反应振幅,噪声暴露史的影响也不会与年龄产生相互作用。随后,我们将研究结果纳入了两项荟萃分析(meta-analyses)中,这两项荟萃分析是针对已发表的关于神经畸形人类样本中年龄和噪声暴露史对 AN 反应振幅影响的研究进行的。荟萃分析发现,不同研究中的年龄效应很强(r = -0.407),但噪声暴露效应很弱(r = -0.152)。我们的结论是,噪声暴露的影响可能因样本特征、研究设计和统计方法的不同而存在很大差异,研究人员在解释结果时应谨慎。在活人身上很难确定与年龄相关和噪声诱导的听觉神经功能变化的潜在病理,因此需要对听觉神经功能在整个生命周期中的变化进行纵向研究,并对死后收集的颞骨进行听觉神经组织学检查。
Effects of age and noise exposure history on auditory nerve response amplitudes: A systematic review, study, and meta-analysis
Auditory nerve (AN) function has been hypothesized to deteriorate with age and noise exposure. Here, we perform a systematic review of published studies and find that the evidence for age-related deficits in AN function is largely consistent across the literature, but there are inconsistent findings among studies of noise exposure history. Further, evidence from animal studies suggests that the greatest deficits in AN response amplitudes are found in noise-exposed aged mice, but a test of the interaction between effects of age and noise exposure on AN function has not been conducted in humans. We report a study of our own examining differences in the response amplitude of the compound action potential N1 (CAP N1) between younger and older adults with and without a self-reported history of noise exposure in a large sample of human participants (63 younger adults 18–30 years of age, 103 older adults 50–86 years of age). CAP N1 response amplitudes were smaller in older than younger adults. Noise exposure history did not appear to predict CAP N1 response amplitudes, nor did the effect of noise exposure history interact with age. We then incorporated our results into two meta-analyses of published studies of age and noise exposure history effects on AN response amplitudes in neurotypical human samples. The meta-analyses found that age effects across studies are robust (r = -0.407), but noise exposure effects are weak (r = -0.152). We conclude that noise exposure effects may be highly variable depending on sample characteristics, study design, and statistical approach, and researchers should be cautious when interpreting results. The underlying pathology of age-related and noise-induced changes in AN function are difficult to determine in living humans, creating a need for longitudinal studies of changes in AN function across the lifespan and histological examination of the AN from temporal bones collected post-mortem.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles.
Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.