Benedetta Coluccia , Roberta Barbieri , Pamela Palmi , Francesco Natale
{"title":"公有制和环境、社会和治理政策:对当地运输企业生产率的影响","authors":"Benedetta Coluccia , Roberta Barbieri , Pamela Palmi , Francesco Natale","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2024.101765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adopting environmental, social and governance (ESG) policies can lead local transport firms to strengthen their reputation progressively, with benefits to their productivity. Ownership structures, especially public ownership prevalent in the transport sector, can also shape company productivity. This study delves into the effects of public ownership on the productivity of a sample of Italian transportation firms, with particular emphasis on their adherence (or lack thereof) to ESG principles. A weighted least squares (WLS) estimation was adopted to assess public ownership's impact on productivity, and a difference-in-differences (DID) approach to examine the combined effect of ESG commitment and ownership structures. Productivity is determined through the Total Factor Productivity (TFP) function. The results highlight a distinct differential in productivity boosts between ESG-compliant and non-ESG-compliant entities. Notably, non-ESG-compliant entities derive more pronounced benefits from public ownership than their compliant counterparts. These findings imply that public ownership is pivotal, especially for firms not adhering to ESG standards. The empirical evidence underscores the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the interplay between public ownership and ESG compliance in shaping firm productivity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 101765"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public ownership and ESG policies: implications for firm productivity in local transportation\",\"authors\":\"Benedetta Coluccia , Roberta Barbieri , Pamela Palmi , Francesco Natale\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2024.101765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Adopting environmental, social and governance (ESG) policies can lead local transport firms to strengthen their reputation progressively, with benefits to their productivity. Ownership structures, especially public ownership prevalent in the transport sector, can also shape company productivity. This study delves into the effects of public ownership on the productivity of a sample of Italian transportation firms, with particular emphasis on their adherence (or lack thereof) to ESG principles. A weighted least squares (WLS) estimation was adopted to assess public ownership's impact on productivity, and a difference-in-differences (DID) approach to examine the combined effect of ESG commitment and ownership structures. Productivity is determined through the Total Factor Productivity (TFP) function. The results highlight a distinct differential in productivity boosts between ESG-compliant and non-ESG-compliant entities. Notably, non-ESG-compliant entities derive more pronounced benefits from public ownership than their compliant counterparts. These findings imply that public ownership is pivotal, especially for firms not adhering to ESG standards. The empirical evidence underscores the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the interplay between public ownership and ESG compliance in shaping firm productivity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101765\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724000584\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724000584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Public ownership and ESG policies: implications for firm productivity in local transportation
Adopting environmental, social and governance (ESG) policies can lead local transport firms to strengthen their reputation progressively, with benefits to their productivity. Ownership structures, especially public ownership prevalent in the transport sector, can also shape company productivity. This study delves into the effects of public ownership on the productivity of a sample of Italian transportation firms, with particular emphasis on their adherence (or lack thereof) to ESG principles. A weighted least squares (WLS) estimation was adopted to assess public ownership's impact on productivity, and a difference-in-differences (DID) approach to examine the combined effect of ESG commitment and ownership structures. Productivity is determined through the Total Factor Productivity (TFP) function. The results highlight a distinct differential in productivity boosts between ESG-compliant and non-ESG-compliant entities. Notably, non-ESG-compliant entities derive more pronounced benefits from public ownership than their compliant counterparts. These findings imply that public ownership is pivotal, especially for firms not adhering to ESG standards. The empirical evidence underscores the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the interplay between public ownership and ESG compliance in shaping firm productivity.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.