E. Thyroff, James B. Friday, Travis W. Idol, Michael A. Szuter, Douglass F. Jacobs
{"title":"根部半寄生虫枋的恢复性种植在获得光照和既有寄主树根网方面的权衡","authors":"E. Thyroff, James B. Friday, Travis W. Idol, Michael A. Szuter, Douglass F. Jacobs","doi":"10.1111/rec.14180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Restoration of root hemiparasite trees, such as Hawaiʻi's endemic Santalum species (ʻiliahi), may benefit from underplanting in stands of suitable hosts like the nitrogen‐fixing native tree, Acacia koa (koa). At a pasture site on Hawaiʻi Island previously reforested with koa, we underplanted seedlings of the island‐endemic sandalwood species, Santalum paniculatum, to examine the tradeoff between access to an established root network (distance to the nearest koa tree) under variable overstory shading (8.8–90.1% canopy openness range) during regeneration establishment. We hypothesized that there is an optimal parasite–host spacing and canopy openness that balance parasitic resource transfer with light availability. ʻIliahi seedling survival was 96% with no survival treatment differences. ‘Iliahi seedling growth was positively related to canopy openness but negatively related to the distance to the nearest koa tree, and the slope of these relationships increased over time. Leaf photosynthetic light compensation points, light saturation points, and stomatal density mostly followed similar trends as growth. These results demonstrate that ‘iliahi can be successfully underplanted in an established koa stand, which benefits ‘iliahi plantings and contributes to diversifying initial restoration and reforestation plantings. There appears to be a significant tradeoff in planting distance between benefits from and competition with the host; however, the improvement in growth with increased canopy openness appeared to be much greater than the effect of planting distance. Underplanting into an established host stand with sufficient canopy openness can help restore functionally compatible and abundant ‘iliahi regeneration into forests.","PeriodicalId":54487,"journal":{"name":"Restoration Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tradeoffs in access to light and root networks of established host trees for restoration planting of the root hemiparasite Santalum paniculatum\",\"authors\":\"E. Thyroff, James B. Friday, Travis W. Idol, Michael A. Szuter, Douglass F. Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/rec.14180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Restoration of root hemiparasite trees, such as Hawaiʻi's endemic Santalum species (ʻiliahi), may benefit from underplanting in stands of suitable hosts like the nitrogen‐fixing native tree, Acacia koa (koa). At a pasture site on Hawaiʻi Island previously reforested with koa, we underplanted seedlings of the island‐endemic sandalwood species, Santalum paniculatum, to examine the tradeoff between access to an established root network (distance to the nearest koa tree) under variable overstory shading (8.8–90.1% canopy openness range) during regeneration establishment. We hypothesized that there is an optimal parasite–host spacing and canopy openness that balance parasitic resource transfer with light availability. ʻIliahi seedling survival was 96% with no survival treatment differences. ‘Iliahi seedling growth was positively related to canopy openness but negatively related to the distance to the nearest koa tree, and the slope of these relationships increased over time. Leaf photosynthetic light compensation points, light saturation points, and stomatal density mostly followed similar trends as growth. These results demonstrate that ‘iliahi can be successfully underplanted in an established koa stand, which benefits ‘iliahi plantings and contributes to diversifying initial restoration and reforestation plantings. There appears to be a significant tradeoff in planting distance between benefits from and competition with the host; however, the improvement in growth with increased canopy openness appeared to be much greater than the effect of planting distance. Underplanting into an established host stand with sufficient canopy openness can help restore functionally compatible and abundant ‘iliahi regeneration into forests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Restoration Ecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Restoration Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14180\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restoration Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tradeoffs in access to light and root networks of established host trees for restoration planting of the root hemiparasite Santalum paniculatum
Restoration of root hemiparasite trees, such as Hawaiʻi's endemic Santalum species (ʻiliahi), may benefit from underplanting in stands of suitable hosts like the nitrogen‐fixing native tree, Acacia koa (koa). At a pasture site on Hawaiʻi Island previously reforested with koa, we underplanted seedlings of the island‐endemic sandalwood species, Santalum paniculatum, to examine the tradeoff between access to an established root network (distance to the nearest koa tree) under variable overstory shading (8.8–90.1% canopy openness range) during regeneration establishment. We hypothesized that there is an optimal parasite–host spacing and canopy openness that balance parasitic resource transfer with light availability. ʻIliahi seedling survival was 96% with no survival treatment differences. ‘Iliahi seedling growth was positively related to canopy openness but negatively related to the distance to the nearest koa tree, and the slope of these relationships increased over time. Leaf photosynthetic light compensation points, light saturation points, and stomatal density mostly followed similar trends as growth. These results demonstrate that ‘iliahi can be successfully underplanted in an established koa stand, which benefits ‘iliahi plantings and contributes to diversifying initial restoration and reforestation plantings. There appears to be a significant tradeoff in planting distance between benefits from and competition with the host; however, the improvement in growth with increased canopy openness appeared to be much greater than the effect of planting distance. Underplanting into an established host stand with sufficient canopy openness can help restore functionally compatible and abundant ‘iliahi regeneration into forests.
期刊介绍:
Restoration Ecology fosters the exchange of ideas among the many disciplines involved with ecological restoration. Addressing global concerns and communicating them to the international research community and restoration practitioners, the journal is at the forefront of a vital new direction in science, ecology, and policy. Original papers describe experimental, observational, and theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine, and freshwater systems, and are considered without taxonomic bias. Contributions span the natural sciences, including ecological and biological aspects, as well as the restoration of soil, air and water when set in an ecological context; and the social sciences, including cultural, philosophical, political, educational, economic and historical aspects. Edited by a distinguished panel, the journal continues to be a major conduit for researchers to publish their findings in the fight to not only halt ecological damage, but also to ultimately reverse it.