Le Yu , Xiao'ao Xue , Shanshan Zheng , Weichu Tao , Qianru Li , Yiran Wang , Xicheng Gu , Yang Sun , Ru Wang , Yinghui Hua
{"title":"前十字韧带损伤和重建后姿势稳定性的单腿评估失败：最新系统回顾和元分析","authors":"Le Yu , Xiao'ao Xue , Shanshan Zheng , Weichu Tao , Qianru Li , Yiran Wang , Xicheng Gu , Yang Sun , Ru Wang , Yinghui Hua","doi":"10.1016/j.smhs.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postural control deficits and persistent joint stability issues are prevalent in population with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries or reconstructions. Postural control is typically assessed using the center of pressure (CoP) parameters during the static single-leg stance with a force plate. However, previous studies have reported unclear definitions and descriptions of the CoP parameters, causing inconsistent results of postural control deficits in a specific population.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To 1) summarize CoP parameters commonly used to evaluate postural control deficits in ACL injured or reconstructed population, and 2) identify the differences in CoP parameters with opened and closed eyes during the single-leg stance between ACL injured or reconstructed and control groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched up to July 2023. Data were obtained from the selected articles and underwent quality and risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis using random-effect models. Subgroup analysis within ACL injured or reconstructed group were also performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 14 articles were included in the analysis after screening. The injured knee of the ACL injured or reconstructed group differed insignificantly in sway amplitude, sway area, and sway velocity during static single-leg stance under opened and closed eyes when compared with the control group. In the subgroup analysis, we found that there was only significant difference in sway velocity with open eyes (<em>SMD</em> = 0.47, <em>p</em> = 0.001) between ACL reconstructed group and control group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study summarized the common CoP parameters used to evaluate postural control in ACL injured or reconstructed population. The results only showed weak difference in sway velocity between ACL reconstructed population and healthy individuals with opened eyes during the static single-leg stance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33620,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages 8-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failed single-leg assessment of postural stability after anterior cruciate ligament injuries and reconstruction: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Le Yu , Xiao'ao Xue , Shanshan Zheng , Weichu Tao , Qianru Li , Yiran Wang , Xicheng Gu , Yang Sun , Ru Wang , Yinghui Hua\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.smhs.2024.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postural control deficits and persistent joint stability issues are prevalent in population with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries or reconstructions. Postural control is typically assessed using the center of pressure (CoP) parameters during the static single-leg stance with a force plate. However, previous studies have reported unclear definitions and descriptions of the CoP parameters, causing inconsistent results of postural control deficits in a specific population.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To 1) summarize CoP parameters commonly used to evaluate postural control deficits in ACL injured or reconstructed population, and 2) identify the differences in CoP parameters with opened and closed eyes during the single-leg stance between ACL injured or reconstructed and control groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched up to July 2023. Data were obtained from the selected articles and underwent quality and risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis using random-effect models. Subgroup analysis within ACL injured or reconstructed group were also performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 14 articles were included in the analysis after screening. The injured knee of the ACL injured or reconstructed group differed insignificantly in sway amplitude, sway area, and sway velocity during static single-leg stance under opened and closed eyes when compared with the control group. In the subgroup analysis, we found that there was only significant difference in sway velocity with open eyes (<em>SMD</em> = 0.47, <em>p</em> = 0.001) between ACL reconstructed group and control group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study summarized the common CoP parameters used to evaluate postural control in ACL injured or reconstructed population. The results only showed weak difference in sway velocity between ACL reconstructed population and healthy individuals with opened eyes during the static single-leg stance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine and Health Science\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 8-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine and Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Failed single-leg assessment of postural stability after anterior cruciate ligament injuries and reconstruction: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Postural control deficits and persistent joint stability issues are prevalent in population with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries or reconstructions. Postural control is typically assessed using the center of pressure (CoP) parameters during the static single-leg stance with a force plate. However, previous studies have reported unclear definitions and descriptions of the CoP parameters, causing inconsistent results of postural control deficits in a specific population.
Objective
To 1) summarize CoP parameters commonly used to evaluate postural control deficits in ACL injured or reconstructed population, and 2) identify the differences in CoP parameters with opened and closed eyes during the single-leg stance between ACL injured or reconstructed and control groups.
Methods
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched up to July 2023. Data were obtained from the selected articles and underwent quality and risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis using random-effect models. Subgroup analysis within ACL injured or reconstructed group were also performed.
Results
A total of 14 articles were included in the analysis after screening. The injured knee of the ACL injured or reconstructed group differed insignificantly in sway amplitude, sway area, and sway velocity during static single-leg stance under opened and closed eyes when compared with the control group. In the subgroup analysis, we found that there was only significant difference in sway velocity with open eyes (SMD = 0.47, p = 0.001) between ACL reconstructed group and control group.
Conclusion
This study summarized the common CoP parameters used to evaluate postural control in ACL injured or reconstructed population. The results only showed weak difference in sway velocity between ACL reconstructed population and healthy individuals with opened eyes during the static single-leg stance.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
