共识轮廓是否能提高 18F-FDG PET 放射特征的稳健性和准确性?

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING EJNMMI Physics Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1186/s40658-024-00652-0
Mingzan Zhuang, Xianru Li, Zhifen Qiu, Jitian Guan
{"title":"共识轮廓是否能提高 18F-FDG PET 放射特征的稳健性和准确性?","authors":"Mingzan Zhuang, Xianru Li, Zhifen Qiu, Jitian Guan","doi":"10.1186/s40658-024-00652-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of our study is to validate the robustness and accuracy of consensus contour in 2-deoxy-2-[ <math><msup><mrow></mrow> <mn>18</mn></msup> </math> F]fluoro-D-glucose ( <math><msup><mrow></mrow> <mn>18</mn></msup> </math> F-FDG) PET radiomic features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>225 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and 13 extended cardio-torso (XCAT) simulated data were enrolled. All segmentation were performed with four segmentation methods under two different initial masks, respectively. Consensus contour (ConSeg) was then developed using the majority vote rule. 107 radiomic features were extracted by Pyradiomics based on segmentation and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for each feature between masks or among segmentation, respectively. In XCAT ICC between segmentation and simulated ground truth were also calculated to access the accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICC varied with the dataset, segmentation method, initial mask and feature type. ConSeg presented higher ICC for radiomic features in robustness tests and similar ICC in accuracy tests, compared with the average of four segmentation results. Higher ICC were also generally observed in irregular initial masks compared with rectangular masks in both robustness and accuracy tests. Furthermore, 19 features (17.76%) had ICC ≥ 0.75 in both robustness and accuracy tests for any of the segmentation methods or initial masks. The dataset was observed to have a large impact on the correlation relationships between radiomic features, but not the segmentation method or initial mask.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The consensus contour combined with irregular initial mask could improve the robustness and accuracy in radiomic analysis to some extent. The correlation relationships between radiomic features and feature clusters largely depended on the dataset, but not segmentation method or initial mask.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"11 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11153434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does consensus contour improve robustness and accuracy in <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET radiomic features?\",\"authors\":\"Mingzan Zhuang, Xianru Li, Zhifen Qiu, Jitian Guan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40658-024-00652-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of our study is to validate the robustness and accuracy of consensus contour in 2-deoxy-2-[ <math><msup><mrow></mrow> <mn>18</mn></msup> </math> F]fluoro-D-glucose ( <math><msup><mrow></mrow> <mn>18</mn></msup> </math> F-FDG) PET radiomic features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>225 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and 13 extended cardio-torso (XCAT) simulated data were enrolled. All segmentation were performed with four segmentation methods under two different initial masks, respectively. Consensus contour (ConSeg) was then developed using the majority vote rule. 107 radiomic features were extracted by Pyradiomics based on segmentation and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for each feature between masks or among segmentation, respectively. In XCAT ICC between segmentation and simulated ground truth were also calculated to access the accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICC varied with the dataset, segmentation method, initial mask and feature type. ConSeg presented higher ICC for radiomic features in robustness tests and similar ICC in accuracy tests, compared with the average of four segmentation results. Higher ICC were also generally observed in irregular initial masks compared with rectangular masks in both robustness and accuracy tests. Furthermore, 19 features (17.76%) had ICC ≥ 0.75 in both robustness and accuracy tests for any of the segmentation methods or initial masks. The dataset was observed to have a large impact on the correlation relationships between radiomic features, but not the segmentation method or initial mask.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The consensus contour combined with irregular initial mask could improve the robustness and accuracy in radiomic analysis to some extent. The correlation relationships between radiomic features and feature clusters largely depended on the dataset, but not segmentation method or initial mask.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI Physics\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11153434/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00652-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00652-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的研究旨在验证共识轮廓在 2-deoxy-2-[ 18 F]fluoro-D-glucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET 放射学特征中的稳健性和准确性。方法:我们收集了 225 例鼻咽癌(NPC)和 13 例扩展心躯干(XCAT)模拟数据。在两种不同的初始掩膜下,分别使用四种分割方法进行了分割。然后使用多数票规则制定了共识轮廓(ConSeg)。Pyradiomics 根据分割结果提取了 107 个放射学特征,并分别计算了掩膜间或分割间每个特征的类内相关系数(ICC)。在 XCAT 中,还计算了分割与模拟地面实况之间的类内相关系数,以获得准确性:结果:ICC 随数据集、分割方法、初始掩膜和特征类型的不同而变化。与四种分割结果的平均值相比,ConSeg 在鲁棒性测试中显示出更高的辐射体特征 ICC,在准确性测试中显示出相似的 ICC。在稳健性和准确性测试中,与矩形掩膜相比,不规则初始掩膜的 ICC 也普遍较高。此外,在任何一种分割方法或初始掩膜的稳健性和准确性测试中,都有 19 个特征(17.76%)的 ICC ≥ 0.75。据观察,数据集对放射学特征之间的相关关系有很大影响,但对分割方法或初始掩膜的影响不大:结论:共识轮廓与不规则初始掩膜相结合,可在一定程度上提高放射学分析的稳健性和准确性。放射学特征与特征簇之间的相关关系主要取决于数据集,而不是分割方法或初始掩膜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does consensus contour improve robustness and accuracy in 18F-FDG PET radiomic features?

Purpose: The purpose of our study is to validate the robustness and accuracy of consensus contour in 2-deoxy-2-[ 18 F]fluoro-D-glucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET radiomic features.

Methods: 225 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and 13 extended cardio-torso (XCAT) simulated data were enrolled. All segmentation were performed with four segmentation methods under two different initial masks, respectively. Consensus contour (ConSeg) was then developed using the majority vote rule. 107 radiomic features were extracted by Pyradiomics based on segmentation and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for each feature between masks or among segmentation, respectively. In XCAT ICC between segmentation and simulated ground truth were also calculated to access the accuracy.

Results: ICC varied with the dataset, segmentation method, initial mask and feature type. ConSeg presented higher ICC for radiomic features in robustness tests and similar ICC in accuracy tests, compared with the average of four segmentation results. Higher ICC were also generally observed in irregular initial masks compared with rectangular masks in both robustness and accuracy tests. Furthermore, 19 features (17.76%) had ICC ≥ 0.75 in both robustness and accuracy tests for any of the segmentation methods or initial masks. The dataset was observed to have a large impact on the correlation relationships between radiomic features, but not the segmentation method or initial mask.

Conclusions: The consensus contour combined with irregular initial mask could improve the robustness and accuracy in radiomic analysis to some extent. The correlation relationships between radiomic features and feature clusters largely depended on the dataset, but not segmentation method or initial mask.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EJNMMI Physics
EJNMMI Physics Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.
期刊最新文献
CT radiation dose reduction with tin filter for localisation/characterisation level image quality in PET-CT: a phantom study. Quantitative analysis of patient motion in walk-through PET scanner and standard axial field of view pet scanner using infrared-based tracking. Comparative analysis of positron emitters for theranostic applications based on small bioconjugates highlighting 43Sc, 61Cu and 45Ti. Impact of cell geometry, cellular uptake region, and tumour morphology on 225Ac and 177Lu dose distributions in prostate cancer. Optimization and application of renal depth measurement method in the cadmium-zinc-telluride‑based SPECT/CT renal dynamic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1