与工作有关的自杀:对病因和干预的理解不断发展。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of industrial medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-09 DOI:10.1002/ajim.23624
Anthony D. LaMontagne ScD, MA, MEd, Maria Åberg MD, PhD, Sandra Blomqvist PhD, Nick Glozier MA, MBBS, MSc, MRCPsych, FRANZCP, PhD, Birgit A. Greiner Dr, rer, Med, Habil, PhD, MPH, Dipl.Psych, Jorgen Gullestrup M Suicidology, Samuel B. Harvey MBBS, MRCPsych, FRANZCP, PhD, Michael J. Kyron PhD, Ida E. H. Madsen PhD, Linda Magnusson Hanson MD, Humaira Maheen PhD, Cameron Mustard, Isabelle Niedhammer PhD, Reiner Rugulies PhD, MSc, MPH, Peter M. Smith PhD, MPH, Yamna Taouk PhD, Sarah Waters PhD, MA, Katrina Witt DPhil, Tania L. King PhD
{"title":"与工作有关的自杀:对病因和干预的理解不断发展。","authors":"Anthony D. LaMontagne ScD, MA, MEd,&nbsp;Maria Åberg MD, PhD,&nbsp;Sandra Blomqvist PhD,&nbsp;Nick Glozier MA, MBBS, MSc, MRCPsych, FRANZCP, PhD,&nbsp;Birgit A. Greiner Dr, rer, Med, Habil, PhD, MPH, Dipl.Psych,&nbsp;Jorgen Gullestrup M Suicidology,&nbsp;Samuel B. Harvey MBBS, MRCPsych, FRANZCP, PhD,&nbsp;Michael J. Kyron PhD,&nbsp;Ida E. H. Madsen PhD,&nbsp;Linda Magnusson Hanson MD,&nbsp;Humaira Maheen PhD,&nbsp;Cameron Mustard,&nbsp;Isabelle Niedhammer PhD,&nbsp;Reiner Rugulies PhD, MSc, MPH,&nbsp;Peter M. Smith PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Yamna Taouk PhD,&nbsp;Sarah Waters PhD, MA,&nbsp;Katrina Witt DPhil,&nbsp;Tania L. King PhD","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previously published analyses of suicide case investigations suggest that work or working conditions contribute to 10%–13% of suicide deaths. Yet, the way in which work may increase suicide risk is an underdeveloped area of epidemiologic research. In this Commentary, we propose a definition of work-related suicide from an occupational health and safety perspective, and review the case investigation-based and epidemiologic evidence on work-related causes of suicide. We identified six broad categories of potential work-related causes of suicide, which are: (1) workplace chemical, physical, and psychosocial exposures; (2) exposure to trauma on the job; (3) access to means of suicide through work; (4) exposure to high-stigma work environments; (5) exposure to normative environments promoting extreme orientation to work; and (6) adverse experiences arising from work-related injury or illness. We summarise current evidence in a schema of potential work-related causes that can also be applied in workplace risk assessment and suicide case investigations. There are numerous implications of these findings for policy and practice. Various principle- and evidence-based workplace intervention strategies for suicide prevention exist, some of which have been shown to improve suicide-prevention literacy, reduce stigma, enhance helping behaviours, and in some instances maybe even reduce suicide rates. Prevailing practice in workplace suicide prevention, however, overly emphasises individual- and illness-directed interventions, with little attention directed to addressing the working conditions that may increase suicide risk. We conclude that a stronger emphasis on improving working conditions will be required for workplace suicide prevention to reach its full preventive potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"67 8","pages":"679-695"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajim.23624","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work-related suicide: Evolving understandings of etiology & intervention\",\"authors\":\"Anthony D. LaMontagne ScD, MA, MEd,&nbsp;Maria Åberg MD, PhD,&nbsp;Sandra Blomqvist PhD,&nbsp;Nick Glozier MA, MBBS, MSc, MRCPsych, FRANZCP, PhD,&nbsp;Birgit A. Greiner Dr, rer, Med, Habil, PhD, MPH, Dipl.Psych,&nbsp;Jorgen Gullestrup M Suicidology,&nbsp;Samuel B. Harvey MBBS, MRCPsych, FRANZCP, PhD,&nbsp;Michael J. Kyron PhD,&nbsp;Ida E. H. Madsen PhD,&nbsp;Linda Magnusson Hanson MD,&nbsp;Humaira Maheen PhD,&nbsp;Cameron Mustard,&nbsp;Isabelle Niedhammer PhD,&nbsp;Reiner Rugulies PhD, MSc, MPH,&nbsp;Peter M. Smith PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Yamna Taouk PhD,&nbsp;Sarah Waters PhD, MA,&nbsp;Katrina Witt DPhil,&nbsp;Tania L. King PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajim.23624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Previously published analyses of suicide case investigations suggest that work or working conditions contribute to 10%–13% of suicide deaths. Yet, the way in which work may increase suicide risk is an underdeveloped area of epidemiologic research. In this Commentary, we propose a definition of work-related suicide from an occupational health and safety perspective, and review the case investigation-based and epidemiologic evidence on work-related causes of suicide. We identified six broad categories of potential work-related causes of suicide, which are: (1) workplace chemical, physical, and psychosocial exposures; (2) exposure to trauma on the job; (3) access to means of suicide through work; (4) exposure to high-stigma work environments; (5) exposure to normative environments promoting extreme orientation to work; and (6) adverse experiences arising from work-related injury or illness. We summarise current evidence in a schema of potential work-related causes that can also be applied in workplace risk assessment and suicide case investigations. There are numerous implications of these findings for policy and practice. Various principle- and evidence-based workplace intervention strategies for suicide prevention exist, some of which have been shown to improve suicide-prevention literacy, reduce stigma, enhance helping behaviours, and in some instances maybe even reduce suicide rates. Prevailing practice in workplace suicide prevention, however, overly emphasises individual- and illness-directed interventions, with little attention directed to addressing the working conditions that may increase suicide risk. We conclude that a stronger emphasis on improving working conditions will be required for workplace suicide prevention to reach its full preventive potential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of industrial medicine\",\"volume\":\"67 8\",\"pages\":\"679-695\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajim.23624\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of industrial medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.23624\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.23624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以前发表的自杀案例调查分析表明,工作或工作条件导致了 10%-13%的自杀死亡。然而,工作可能增加自杀风险的方式是一个尚未充分开发的流行病学研究领域。在这篇评论中,我们从职业健康和安全的角度提出了与工作有关的自杀的定义,并回顾了基于案例调查和流行病学证据的与工作有关的自杀原因。我们确定了六大类与工作相关的潜在自杀原因,分别是(1) 工作场所的化学、物理和社会心理接触;(2) 在工作中遭受创伤;(3) 通过工作获得自杀手段;(4) 接触高耻辱感的工作环境;(5) 接触促进极端工作取向的规范环境;(6) 与工作有关的伤害或疾病导致的不良经历。我们将当前的证据归纳为一个潜在的工作相关原因模式,该模式也可用于工作场所风险评估和自杀案例调查。这些发现对政策和实践有诸多影响。目前存在各种以原则和证据为基础的工作场所自杀预防干预策略,其中一些已被证明能够提高自杀预防素养、减少耻辱感、加强帮助行为,在某些情况下甚至可以降低自杀率。然而,预防职场自杀的普遍做法过于强调针对个人和疾病的干预措施,而很少关注可能增加自杀风险的工作条件。我们的结论是,要想充分发挥预防工作场所自杀的潜力,就必须更加重视改善工作条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Work-related suicide: Evolving understandings of etiology & intervention

Previously published analyses of suicide case investigations suggest that work or working conditions contribute to 10%–13% of suicide deaths. Yet, the way in which work may increase suicide risk is an underdeveloped area of epidemiologic research. In this Commentary, we propose a definition of work-related suicide from an occupational health and safety perspective, and review the case investigation-based and epidemiologic evidence on work-related causes of suicide. We identified six broad categories of potential work-related causes of suicide, which are: (1) workplace chemical, physical, and psychosocial exposures; (2) exposure to trauma on the job; (3) access to means of suicide through work; (4) exposure to high-stigma work environments; (5) exposure to normative environments promoting extreme orientation to work; and (6) adverse experiences arising from work-related injury or illness. We summarise current evidence in a schema of potential work-related causes that can also be applied in workplace risk assessment and suicide case investigations. There are numerous implications of these findings for policy and practice. Various principle- and evidence-based workplace intervention strategies for suicide prevention exist, some of which have been shown to improve suicide-prevention literacy, reduce stigma, enhance helping behaviours, and in some instances maybe even reduce suicide rates. Prevailing practice in workplace suicide prevention, however, overly emphasises individual- and illness-directed interventions, with little attention directed to addressing the working conditions that may increase suicide risk. We conclude that a stronger emphasis on improving working conditions will be required for workplace suicide prevention to reach its full preventive potential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
期刊最新文献
A Review of Job Assignments and Asbestos Workplace Exposure Measurements for TAWP Mesothelioma Deaths Through 2011. Issue Information Association Between Employment Factors and Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease in US Law Enforcement Workers: The National Health Interview Survey, 2006-2018. Practical considerations for using personal cooling garments for heat stress management in physically demanding occupations: A systematic review and meta-analysis using realist evaluation. Functional disabilities and adverse well-being by COVID-19 and Long COVID history and employment status: 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1