炎热天气条件下大型奶牛场食品安全措施的多重标准评估

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Microbial Risk Analysis Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1016/j.mran.2024.100312
Rodney J. Feliciano , Paola Guzmán-Luna , Almudena Hospido , Jeanne-Marie Membré
{"title":"炎热天气条件下大型奶牛场食品安全措施的多重标准评估","authors":"Rodney J. Feliciano ,&nbsp;Paola Guzmán-Luna ,&nbsp;Almudena Hospido ,&nbsp;Jeanne-Marie Membré","doi":"10.1016/j.mran.2024.100312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dairy farms are vulnerable to the impacts of climate change through the alteration of raw milk quality and pressure on animal health. Measures in dairy farms are necessary to reduce microbiological risks that may impact animal health and may be passed on to humans through the consumption of contaminated dairy products. However, these additional controls should incur lower environmental impact, have a low cost of implementation, minimal impact on milk property, and sufficient effectiveness to control risks. This study selected a dairy farm located under hot weather conditions to demonstrate how these challenges may be considered. Our objective was to present how a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) could be used to select the appropriate mitigation strategy for this farm among fifteen potential food safety measures.</p><p>The MCDA framework brought together ten criteria classified into four supra criteria: stakeholder acceptance, food safety effectiveness, environmental impact, and impact on milk properties. The relative performances of various food safety measures scored against the ten criteria were expressed either in qualitative or quantitative values. Ultimately, the outranking MCDA technique, PROMETHEE II, was used to rank the measures.</p><p>This study ranked the selected four food safety measures, namely, sand bedding, chitosan supplementation, cooling mister operation, and phage spray, after a series of preselection filters. It was found that none of these dominated the others on the ten criteria. However, MCDA has allowed the determination of the best compromise among the selected measures. It was found that an increase in the frequency of changing the sand bedding ranked first, and an increase in the operation of cooling misters was ranked last.</p><p>The study demonstrated the benefit of MCDA in combining criteria of different nature (stakeholder acceptance, food safety effectiveness, environmental impact, milk properties), values, and scales to prioritize food safety measures. The approach can be applied to other dairy farms eager to limit the impacts of climate change while guaranteeing food safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48593,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Risk Analysis","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100312"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352224000239/pdfft?md5=76fa694c49027f21bde3e581498ef0b0&pid=1-s2.0-S2352352224000239-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multicriteria assessment of food safety measures for a large dairy farm in hot weather conditions\",\"authors\":\"Rodney J. Feliciano ,&nbsp;Paola Guzmán-Luna ,&nbsp;Almudena Hospido ,&nbsp;Jeanne-Marie Membré\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mran.2024.100312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Dairy farms are vulnerable to the impacts of climate change through the alteration of raw milk quality and pressure on animal health. Measures in dairy farms are necessary to reduce microbiological risks that may impact animal health and may be passed on to humans through the consumption of contaminated dairy products. However, these additional controls should incur lower environmental impact, have a low cost of implementation, minimal impact on milk property, and sufficient effectiveness to control risks. This study selected a dairy farm located under hot weather conditions to demonstrate how these challenges may be considered. Our objective was to present how a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) could be used to select the appropriate mitigation strategy for this farm among fifteen potential food safety measures.</p><p>The MCDA framework brought together ten criteria classified into four supra criteria: stakeholder acceptance, food safety effectiveness, environmental impact, and impact on milk properties. The relative performances of various food safety measures scored against the ten criteria were expressed either in qualitative or quantitative values. Ultimately, the outranking MCDA technique, PROMETHEE II, was used to rank the measures.</p><p>This study ranked the selected four food safety measures, namely, sand bedding, chitosan supplementation, cooling mister operation, and phage spray, after a series of preselection filters. It was found that none of these dominated the others on the ten criteria. However, MCDA has allowed the determination of the best compromise among the selected measures. It was found that an increase in the frequency of changing the sand bedding ranked first, and an increase in the operation of cooling misters was ranked last.</p><p>The study demonstrated the benefit of MCDA in combining criteria of different nature (stakeholder acceptance, food safety effectiveness, environmental impact, milk properties), values, and scales to prioritize food safety measures. The approach can be applied to other dairy farms eager to limit the impacts of climate change while guaranteeing food safety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbial Risk Analysis\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352224000239/pdfft?md5=76fa694c49027f21bde3e581498ef0b0&pid=1-s2.0-S2352352224000239-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbial Risk Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352224000239\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352224000239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

奶牛场容易受到气候变化的影响,因为气候变化会改变原奶质量并对动物健康造成压力。有必要在奶牛场采取措施,降低可能影响动物健康并可能通过食用受污染奶制品传染给人类的微生物风险。然而,这些额外的控制措施对环境的影响应该较小,实施成本较低,对牛奶财产的影响最小,并能充分有效地控制风险。本研究选择了一个位于炎热天气条件下的奶牛场,以展示如何考虑这些挑战。我们的目标是介绍如何利用多标准决策分析(MCDA)从 15 种潜在的食品安全措施中为该牧场选择适当的缓解策略。MCDA 框架汇集了 10 个标准,分为四个超级标准:利益相关者接受度、食品安全有效性、环境影响和对牛奶特性的影响。根据这十项标准对各种食品安全措施的相对性能进行评分,并以定性或定量值表示。经过一系列预选筛选后,本研究对选定的四项食品安全措施进行了排序,这四项措施分别是沙垫层、壳聚糖补充剂、冷却喷雾器操作和噬菌体喷洒。结果发现,在十项标准中,这四项措施都不占优势。不过,MCDA 可以确定所选措施中的最佳折中方案。这项研究证明了 MCDA 在将不同性质的标准(利益相关者接受度、食品安全有效性、环境影响、牛奶特性)、价值和尺度结合起来以确定食品安全措施的优先次序方面的优势。该方法可应用于其他渴望在保证食品安全的同时限制气候变化影响的奶牛场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A multicriteria assessment of food safety measures for a large dairy farm in hot weather conditions

Dairy farms are vulnerable to the impacts of climate change through the alteration of raw milk quality and pressure on animal health. Measures in dairy farms are necessary to reduce microbiological risks that may impact animal health and may be passed on to humans through the consumption of contaminated dairy products. However, these additional controls should incur lower environmental impact, have a low cost of implementation, minimal impact on milk property, and sufficient effectiveness to control risks. This study selected a dairy farm located under hot weather conditions to demonstrate how these challenges may be considered. Our objective was to present how a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) could be used to select the appropriate mitigation strategy for this farm among fifteen potential food safety measures.

The MCDA framework brought together ten criteria classified into four supra criteria: stakeholder acceptance, food safety effectiveness, environmental impact, and impact on milk properties. The relative performances of various food safety measures scored against the ten criteria were expressed either in qualitative or quantitative values. Ultimately, the outranking MCDA technique, PROMETHEE II, was used to rank the measures.

This study ranked the selected four food safety measures, namely, sand bedding, chitosan supplementation, cooling mister operation, and phage spray, after a series of preselection filters. It was found that none of these dominated the others on the ten criteria. However, MCDA has allowed the determination of the best compromise among the selected measures. It was found that an increase in the frequency of changing the sand bedding ranked first, and an increase in the operation of cooling misters was ranked last.

The study demonstrated the benefit of MCDA in combining criteria of different nature (stakeholder acceptance, food safety effectiveness, environmental impact, milk properties), values, and scales to prioritize food safety measures. The approach can be applied to other dairy farms eager to limit the impacts of climate change while guaranteeing food safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbial Risk Analysis
Microbial Risk Analysis Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The journal Microbial Risk Analysis accepts articles dealing with the study of risk analysis applied to microbial hazards. Manuscripts should at least cover any of the components of risk assessment (risk characterization, exposure assessment, etc.), risk management and/or risk communication in any microbiology field (clinical, environmental, food, veterinary, etc.). This journal also accepts article dealing with predictive microbiology, quantitative microbial ecology, mathematical modeling, risk studies applied to microbial ecology, quantitative microbiology for epidemiological studies, statistical methods applied to microbiology, and laws and regulatory policies aimed at lessening the risk of microbial hazards. Work focusing on risk studies of viruses, parasites, microbial toxins, antimicrobial resistant organisms, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and recombinant DNA products are also acceptable.
期刊最新文献
Quantitative microbial risk assessment of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella enterica contaminating hydroponic leafy vegetables Assessing urban street food safety among youth: The impact of road dust on potential microbial contamination risks to student health Measuring transboundary disease spread - ASF in wild boars straddling Piedmont and Liguria An approach to the microbiological risk ranking of cheeses Biothermodynamic analysis of the Dengue virus: Empirical formulas, biosynthesis reactions and thermodynamic properties of antigen-receptor binding and biosynthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1