{"title":"通过基于 CSW 的两阶段网络 DEA 模型评估土耳其机场绩效","authors":"Edib Ali Pehli̇vanli, Volkan Soner Özsoy","doi":"10.1680/jtran.23.00111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a widely used strategic performance management tool to evaluate airport performance. However, earlier studies identified shortcomings in DEA. The first is using traditional DEA models for single-phase modelling of intricate structures like airports. The second is that when DEA calculates efficiency scores, some important aspects are ignored with zero weights. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a minimax two-phase DEA model can address these issues in performance evaluations of complex units like airports by achieving more consistent efficiency scores and ranks. To evaluate airport performance, two models are compared: the minimax two-phase DEA model based on Common Set of Weights (CSWs) and the common multiplicative two-phase DEA model. Data from 42 Turkish airports covering the years 2014–2019 is analysed for this purpose. The two phases of an airport model are flight infrastructure and flight consolidation. The results demonstrate that more consistent rankings and efficiency scores are obtained when the minimax two-phase DEA model based on CSW is used. The study highlights the model's benefits for strategic performance evaluation and offers recommendations for policymakers and airport engineers regarding further investments.","PeriodicalId":516934,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport","volume":" 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Turkish airport performances via two-phase network DEA models based on CSWs\",\"authors\":\"Edib Ali Pehli̇vanli, Volkan Soner Özsoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jtran.23.00111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a widely used strategic performance management tool to evaluate airport performance. However, earlier studies identified shortcomings in DEA. The first is using traditional DEA models for single-phase modelling of intricate structures like airports. The second is that when DEA calculates efficiency scores, some important aspects are ignored with zero weights. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a minimax two-phase DEA model can address these issues in performance evaluations of complex units like airports by achieving more consistent efficiency scores and ranks. To evaluate airport performance, two models are compared: the minimax two-phase DEA model based on Common Set of Weights (CSWs) and the common multiplicative two-phase DEA model. Data from 42 Turkish airports covering the years 2014–2019 is analysed for this purpose. The two phases of an airport model are flight infrastructure and flight consolidation. The results demonstrate that more consistent rankings and efficiency scores are obtained when the minimax two-phase DEA model based on CSW is used. The study highlights the model's benefits for strategic performance evaluation and offers recommendations for policymakers and airport engineers regarding further investments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport\",\"volume\":\" 30\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.23.00111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.23.00111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
数据包络分析(DEA)是一种广泛使用的战略绩效管理工具,用于评估机场绩效。然而,早期的研究发现了 DEA 的不足之处。首先是使用传统的 DEA 模型对机场等复杂结构进行单阶段建模。其次,当 DEA 计算效率分数时,一些重要方面被忽略,权重为零。本研究的目的是确定最小两阶段 DEA 模型是否能在机场等复杂单位的绩效评估中解决这些问题,实现更一致的效率得分和排名。为了评估机场绩效,本研究比较了两种模型:基于通用权重集(CSW)的最小两阶段 DEA 模型和通用乘法两阶段 DEA 模型。为此分析了土耳其 42 个机场 2014-2019 年的数据。机场模型的两个阶段是航班基础设施和航班整合。结果表明,在使用基于 CSW 的最小两阶段 DEA 模型时,可获得更一致的排名和效率得分。研究强调了该模型在战略绩效评估方面的优势,并为政策制定者和机场工程师提供了有关进一步投资的建议。
Assessment of Turkish airport performances via two-phase network DEA models based on CSWs
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a widely used strategic performance management tool to evaluate airport performance. However, earlier studies identified shortcomings in DEA. The first is using traditional DEA models for single-phase modelling of intricate structures like airports. The second is that when DEA calculates efficiency scores, some important aspects are ignored with zero weights. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a minimax two-phase DEA model can address these issues in performance evaluations of complex units like airports by achieving more consistent efficiency scores and ranks. To evaluate airport performance, two models are compared: the minimax two-phase DEA model based on Common Set of Weights (CSWs) and the common multiplicative two-phase DEA model. Data from 42 Turkish airports covering the years 2014–2019 is analysed for this purpose. The two phases of an airport model are flight infrastructure and flight consolidation. The results demonstrate that more consistent rankings and efficiency scores are obtained when the minimax two-phase DEA model based on CSW is used. The study highlights the model's benefits for strategic performance evaluation and offers recommendations for policymakers and airport engineers regarding further investments.