工作需求-资源理论的延伸:压力、孤独和照顾责任对英国博士生和学者心理健康的影响

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1080/03075079.2024.2357148
Akiko Ueno, Chong Yu, Lucill Curtis, Charles Dennis
{"title":"工作需求-资源理论的延伸:压力、孤独和照顾责任对英国博士生和学者心理健康的影响","authors":"Akiko Ueno, Chong Yu, Lucill Curtis, Charles Dennis","doi":"10.1080/03075079.2024.2357148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the increasing challenges in academia since the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, it is crucial to understand how work demands, life demands, and job resources affect the mental health of academic researchers. In extending the job demands-resources theory, the present study investigates the relationships between job resources, research work demand, life demand (i.e. caring responsibility), stress, loneliness and mental health among doctoral students and academics. The results from a secondary dataset of 4,563 academic researchers (academics undertaking research and doctoral students) in the UK indicate that job resources are positively associated with mental health, while caring responsibility and loneliness negatively impact mental health. Stress is also found to partially mediate (explain) the relationships between job resources, research work demand, and mental health. Moreover, loneliness moderates the positive impact of job resources on mental health, particularly attenuating this relationship for academic researchers who experience higher levels of loneliness. Surprisingly, during Covid-19, the moderation effect of gender on the path from caring responsibility to stress is significantly stronger for males than for female colleagues. Feeling unprepared, male colleagues who were pressured to take on caring responsibilities experienced higher stress. We suggest strategic interventions to enhance job resources and support researchers who have caregiving responsibilities, while also alleviating stress and feelings of loneliness. Future research should engage alternative perspectives at both individual (e.g. age, familial wealth) and institutional (e.g. education system, discipline/field) levels.","PeriodicalId":38748,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Job demands-resources theory extended: stress, loneliness, and care responsibilities impacting UK doctoral students’ and academics’ mental health\",\"authors\":\"Akiko Ueno, Chong Yu, Lucill Curtis, Charles Dennis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03075079.2024.2357148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Given the increasing challenges in academia since the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, it is crucial to understand how work demands, life demands, and job resources affect the mental health of academic researchers. In extending the job demands-resources theory, the present study investigates the relationships between job resources, research work demand, life demand (i.e. caring responsibility), stress, loneliness and mental health among doctoral students and academics. The results from a secondary dataset of 4,563 academic researchers (academics undertaking research and doctoral students) in the UK indicate that job resources are positively associated with mental health, while caring responsibility and loneliness negatively impact mental health. Stress is also found to partially mediate (explain) the relationships between job resources, research work demand, and mental health. Moreover, loneliness moderates the positive impact of job resources on mental health, particularly attenuating this relationship for academic researchers who experience higher levels of loneliness. Surprisingly, during Covid-19, the moderation effect of gender on the path from caring responsibility to stress is significantly stronger for males than for female colleagues. Feeling unprepared, male colleagues who were pressured to take on caring responsibilities experienced higher stress. We suggest strategic interventions to enhance job resources and support researchers who have caregiving responsibilities, while also alleviating stress and feelings of loneliness. Future research should engage alternative perspectives at both individual (e.g. age, familial wealth) and institutional (e.g. education system, discipline/field) levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Higher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2357148\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2357148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 Covid-19 大流行以来,学术界面临着越来越多的挑战,因此了解工作需求、生活需求和工作资源如何影响学术研究人员的心理健康至关重要。本研究扩展了工作需求-资源理论,调查了博士生和学者的工作资源、研究工作需求、生活需求(即照顾责任)、压力、孤独感和心理健康之间的关系。来自英国 4563 名学术研究人员(从事研究工作的学者和博士生)的二手数据集的结果表明,工作资源与心理健康呈正相关,而照顾责任和孤独感则对心理健康产生负面影响。研究还发现,压力可以部分调解(解释)工作资源、研究工作需求和心理健康之间的关系。此外,孤独感也调节了工作资源对心理健康的积极影响,尤其是对于那些孤独感较强的学术研究人员来说,这种关系会有所减弱。令人惊讶的是,在 Covid-19 期间,性别对从照顾责任到压力这一路径的调节作用,男性同事明显强于女性同事。感到毫无准备、被迫承担照顾责任的男同事承受了更大的压力。我们建议采取战略性干预措施,增加工作资源,为承担照顾责任的研究人员提供支持,同时减轻压力和孤独感。未来的研究应从个人(如年龄、家庭财富)和机构(如教育系统、学科/领域)两个层面来考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Job demands-resources theory extended: stress, loneliness, and care responsibilities impacting UK doctoral students’ and academics’ mental health
Given the increasing challenges in academia since the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, it is crucial to understand how work demands, life demands, and job resources affect the mental health of academic researchers. In extending the job demands-resources theory, the present study investigates the relationships between job resources, research work demand, life demand (i.e. caring responsibility), stress, loneliness and mental health among doctoral students and academics. The results from a secondary dataset of 4,563 academic researchers (academics undertaking research and doctoral students) in the UK indicate that job resources are positively associated with mental health, while caring responsibility and loneliness negatively impact mental health. Stress is also found to partially mediate (explain) the relationships between job resources, research work demand, and mental health. Moreover, loneliness moderates the positive impact of job resources on mental health, particularly attenuating this relationship for academic researchers who experience higher levels of loneliness. Surprisingly, during Covid-19, the moderation effect of gender on the path from caring responsibility to stress is significantly stronger for males than for female colleagues. Feeling unprepared, male colleagues who were pressured to take on caring responsibilities experienced higher stress. We suggest strategic interventions to enhance job resources and support researchers who have caregiving responsibilities, while also alleviating stress and feelings of loneliness. Future research should engage alternative perspectives at both individual (e.g. age, familial wealth) and institutional (e.g. education system, discipline/field) levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Higher Education
Studies in Higher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Studies in Higher Education is a leading international journal publishing research-based articles dealing with higher education issues from either a disciplinary or multi-disciplinary perspective. Empirical, theoretical and conceptual articles of significant originality will be considered. The Journal welcomes contributions that seek to enhance understanding of higher education policy, institutional management and performance, teaching and learning, and the contribution of higher education to society and the economy. Comparative studies and analysis of inter-system and cross-national issues are also welcomed, as are those addressing global and international themes. The Journal will publish annually two special issues on topics of international significance to higher education.
期刊最新文献
Gender identity and access to higher education Ideologies shaping university competition Collaborative approaches to embedding academic literacy instruction in the curriculum: examples from UK universities Teacher education students’ experiences navigating inherent requirements within their courses of study How do universities compete? Introduction to the special issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1