空气流入真空固定装置会影响设置误差。

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiological Physics and Technology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1007/s12194-024-00822-w
Fumiyasu Matsubayashi, Tatsuya Kamima, Yasushi Ito, Yasuo Yoshioka
{"title":"空气流入真空固定装置会影响设置误差。","authors":"Fumiyasu Matsubayashi, Tatsuya Kamima, Yasushi Ito, Yasuo Yoshioka","doi":"10.1007/s12194-024-00822-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to determine the impact of air inflow into vacuum-type immobilization devices (VIDs) on setup errors. We assigned 70 patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer to groups V (n = 34) or N (n = 36) according to whether the VIDs were deflated weekly or not deflated during treatment, respectively. We calculated systematic errors (Σ) as the standard deviations (SDs) of mean errors, and random errors (σ) as the root mean square of SDs in each patient. We compared overall means (μ), SDs (SD<sub>overall</sub>), random errors and systematic errors. We also measured temporary pressure changes in VIDs to determine the influence of pressure changes in VIDs on setup errors. The μ was within 0.20 mm and 0.2° in both groups, whereas SD<sub>overall</sub> significantly differed between them. The SD<sub>overall</sub> differed the most in the Roll axes of groups N (0. 87°) and V (0.58°). The Σ and σ values were lower in all axes of group V than in group N. Despite the initial deflation target of - 70 kPa, the pressure in VIDs reached - 5 kPa at the end of treatment. However, weekly deflation apparently maintained pressure at - 20 kPa. Effective pressure control in VIDs can reduce patient-by-patient variation and improve setup reproducibility for individual patients, consequently resulting in small variations among overall setup errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"697-702"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Air inflow into vacuum-type immobilization devices impacts setup errors.\",\"authors\":\"Fumiyasu Matsubayashi, Tatsuya Kamima, Yasushi Ito, Yasuo Yoshioka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12194-024-00822-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We aimed to determine the impact of air inflow into vacuum-type immobilization devices (VIDs) on setup errors. We assigned 70 patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer to groups V (n = 34) or N (n = 36) according to whether the VIDs were deflated weekly or not deflated during treatment, respectively. We calculated systematic errors (Σ) as the standard deviations (SDs) of mean errors, and random errors (σ) as the root mean square of SDs in each patient. We compared overall means (μ), SDs (SD<sub>overall</sub>), random errors and systematic errors. We also measured temporary pressure changes in VIDs to determine the influence of pressure changes in VIDs on setup errors. The μ was within 0.20 mm and 0.2° in both groups, whereas SD<sub>overall</sub> significantly differed between them. The SD<sub>overall</sub> differed the most in the Roll axes of groups N (0. 87°) and V (0.58°). The Σ and σ values were lower in all axes of group V than in group N. Despite the initial deflation target of - 70 kPa, the pressure in VIDs reached - 5 kPa at the end of treatment. However, weekly deflation apparently maintained pressure at - 20 kPa. Effective pressure control in VIDs can reduce patient-by-patient variation and improve setup reproducibility for individual patients, consequently resulting in small variations among overall setup errors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiological Physics and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"697-702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiological Physics and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00822-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00822-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是确定真空固定装置(VID)中的空气流入量对设置误差的影响。我们将 70 名接受头颈部癌症放疗的患者按照 VID 每周放气或治疗期间不放气的情况分别分为 V 组(34 人)或 N 组(36 人)。我们用平均误差的标准差 (SD) 计算系统误差 (Σ),用 SD 的均方根计算随机误差 (σ)。我们比较了总体平均值 (μ)、标差 (SDoverall)、随机误差和系统误差。我们还测量了 VID 中的临时压力变化,以确定 VID 中的压力变化对设置误差的影响。两组的 μ 和 SDoverall 分别在 0.20 mm 和 0.2° 范围内,而 SDoverall 在两组之间存在显著差异。在 N 组(0.87°)和 V 组(0.58°)的滚轴上,SDoverall 的差异最大。尽管最初的放气目标值为 - 70 kPa,但在治疗结束时,VIDs 的压力达到了 - 5 kPa。然而,每周一次的放气显然能将压力维持在 - 20 kPa。有效控制 VIDs 中的压力可以减少患者之间的差异,提高个别患者设置的可重复性,从而使整体设置误差的差异很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Air inflow into vacuum-type immobilization devices impacts setup errors.

We aimed to determine the impact of air inflow into vacuum-type immobilization devices (VIDs) on setup errors. We assigned 70 patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer to groups V (n = 34) or N (n = 36) according to whether the VIDs were deflated weekly or not deflated during treatment, respectively. We calculated systematic errors (Σ) as the standard deviations (SDs) of mean errors, and random errors (σ) as the root mean square of SDs in each patient. We compared overall means (μ), SDs (SDoverall), random errors and systematic errors. We also measured temporary pressure changes in VIDs to determine the influence of pressure changes in VIDs on setup errors. The μ was within 0.20 mm and 0.2° in both groups, whereas SDoverall significantly differed between them. The SDoverall differed the most in the Roll axes of groups N (0. 87°) and V (0.58°). The Σ and σ values were lower in all axes of group V than in group N. Despite the initial deflation target of - 70 kPa, the pressure in VIDs reached - 5 kPa at the end of treatment. However, weekly deflation apparently maintained pressure at - 20 kPa. Effective pressure control in VIDs can reduce patient-by-patient variation and improve setup reproducibility for individual patients, consequently resulting in small variations among overall setup errors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgment. Evaluation of calculation accuracy and computation time in a commercial treatment planning system for accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy. Development of deep learning-based novel auto-segmentation for the prostatic urethra on planning CT images for prostate cancer radiotherapy. Effect of deep learning reconstruction on the assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions using computed tomography. Assessment of accuracy and repeatability of quantitative parameter mapping in MRI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1