紧急医疗服务提供者在为寻求庇护者和难民提供医疗服务方面的观点。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2024-213899
Cal Doherty, Joanna Quinn, David John Lowe, Amal R Khanolkar
{"title":"紧急医疗服务提供者在为寻求庇护者和难民提供医疗服务方面的观点。","authors":"Cal Doherty, Joanna Quinn, David John Lowe, Amal R Khanolkar","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-213899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of asylum seekers awaiting decisions on their claims in the UK has more than tripled since 2014. How we meet international obligations to provide appropriate healthcare to asylum seekers and refugees (ASRs) is therefore an increasingly important issue. The views of frontline healthcare workers are vital to ensure the development of sustainable and effective health policy when it comes to caring for this group.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A single-centre qualitative study in the form of semistructured interviews was conducted at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital ED in Glasgow, Scotland, between January and March 2023. Volunteering ED care providers (EDCPs)-doctors and nurses-working in the ED were interviewed and the data analysed and presented through a thematic analytical framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 semistructured interviews were conducted-6 doctors and 6 nurses. Analysis revealed four themes: (1) 'staff attitudes' highlighted in particular the positive views of the participants in providing care for ASRs; (2) 'presentation patterns' revealed significant variations in opinion, with one-third of participants, for example, believing there was no difference in presentations compared with the general population; (3) 'challenges to optimal care' outlines multiple subthemes which impact care including the unique challenge of the ED triage system; and (4) 'transition in care' discusses participant concerns regarding arranging safe and appropriate follow-up for ASR patients. Ethical dilemmas in providing care, as highlighted in previous studies, did not feature heavily in discussions in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides an insight into the views of EDCPs in providing care to ASRs in the ED. Study findings can potentially contribute to the development of ED-specific guidelines as well as inform wider health policy and provide a focus and direction for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"578-584"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Views of emergency care providers in providing healthcare for asylum seekers and refugees.\",\"authors\":\"Cal Doherty, Joanna Quinn, David John Lowe, Amal R Khanolkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emermed-2024-213899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of asylum seekers awaiting decisions on their claims in the UK has more than tripled since 2014. How we meet international obligations to provide appropriate healthcare to asylum seekers and refugees (ASRs) is therefore an increasingly important issue. The views of frontline healthcare workers are vital to ensure the development of sustainable and effective health policy when it comes to caring for this group.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A single-centre qualitative study in the form of semistructured interviews was conducted at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital ED in Glasgow, Scotland, between January and March 2023. Volunteering ED care providers (EDCPs)-doctors and nurses-working in the ED were interviewed and the data analysed and presented through a thematic analytical framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 semistructured interviews were conducted-6 doctors and 6 nurses. Analysis revealed four themes: (1) 'staff attitudes' highlighted in particular the positive views of the participants in providing care for ASRs; (2) 'presentation patterns' revealed significant variations in opinion, with one-third of participants, for example, believing there was no difference in presentations compared with the general population; (3) 'challenges to optimal care' outlines multiple subthemes which impact care including the unique challenge of the ED triage system; and (4) 'transition in care' discusses participant concerns regarding arranging safe and appropriate follow-up for ASR patients. Ethical dilemmas in providing care, as highlighted in previous studies, did not feature heavily in discussions in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides an insight into the views of EDCPs in providing care to ASRs in the ED. Study findings can potentially contribute to the development of ED-specific guidelines as well as inform wider health policy and provide a focus and direction for further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"578-584\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-213899\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-213899","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自 2014 年以来,在英国等待裁决的寻求庇护者人数增加了两倍多。因此,如何履行国际义务,为寻求庇护者和难民(ASRs)提供适当的医疗保健服务是一个日益重要的问题。一线医护人员的意见对于确保在照顾这一群体时制定可持续、有效的医疗政策至关重要:方法:2023 年 1 月至 3 月期间,在苏格兰格拉斯哥伊丽莎白女王大学医院急诊室开展了一项半结构化访谈形式的单中心定性研究。对在急诊室工作的急诊室志愿护理人员(EDCPs)--医生和护士进行了访谈,并通过主题分析框架对数据进行了分析和展示:共进行了 12 次半结构式访谈,其中医生 6 次,护士 6 次。分析显示了四个主题:(1)"员工态度 "特别强调了参与者在为 ASR 患者提供护理方面的积极观点;(2)"发病模式 "显示了显著的意见分歧,例如,三分之一的参与者认为发病模式与普通人群没有区别;(3)"最佳护理面临的挑战 "概述了影响护理的多个次主题,包括急诊室分流系统的独特挑战;以及(4)"护理过渡 "讨论了参与者对为 ASR 患者安排安全、适当的后续治疗的担忧。以往研究中强调的提供护理时的伦理困境在本研究的讨论中并不突出:本研究深入探讨了 EDCP 在急诊室为 ASR 患者提供护理时的观点。研究结果可能有助于制定针对急诊室的指南,为更广泛的卫生政策提供信息,并为进一步研究提供重点和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Views of emergency care providers in providing healthcare for asylum seekers and refugees.

Background: The number of asylum seekers awaiting decisions on their claims in the UK has more than tripled since 2014. How we meet international obligations to provide appropriate healthcare to asylum seekers and refugees (ASRs) is therefore an increasingly important issue. The views of frontline healthcare workers are vital to ensure the development of sustainable and effective health policy when it comes to caring for this group.

Method: A single-centre qualitative study in the form of semistructured interviews was conducted at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital ED in Glasgow, Scotland, between January and March 2023. Volunteering ED care providers (EDCPs)-doctors and nurses-working in the ED were interviewed and the data analysed and presented through a thematic analytical framework.

Results: 12 semistructured interviews were conducted-6 doctors and 6 nurses. Analysis revealed four themes: (1) 'staff attitudes' highlighted in particular the positive views of the participants in providing care for ASRs; (2) 'presentation patterns' revealed significant variations in opinion, with one-third of participants, for example, believing there was no difference in presentations compared with the general population; (3) 'challenges to optimal care' outlines multiple subthemes which impact care including the unique challenge of the ED triage system; and (4) 'transition in care' discusses participant concerns regarding arranging safe and appropriate follow-up for ASR patients. Ethical dilemmas in providing care, as highlighted in previous studies, did not feature heavily in discussions in this study.

Conclusion: This study provides an insight into the views of EDCPs in providing care to ASRs in the ED. Study findings can potentially contribute to the development of ED-specific guidelines as well as inform wider health policy and provide a focus and direction for further research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
期刊最新文献
Best evidence topic report: can intradermal sterile water injections provide effective pain relief in patients with renal colic? Correspondence on 'Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus andexanet alfa for the reversal of traumatic brain injuries' by Sadek et al. Correspondence on 'Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus andexanet alfa for the reversal of traumatic brain injuries' by Sadek et al. Is it time to reframe resuscitation in trauma? Are there differences in low-acuity emergency department visits between culturally and linguistically diverse migrants and people with English-speaking background: a population-based linkage study of adults over 45.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1