高寒草地植物功能群的相互作用随着气候变暖而加剧

IF 5.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Ecography Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1111/ecog.07018
Francesca Jaroszynska, Siri Lie Olsen, Ragnhild Gya, Kari Klanderud, Richard Telford, Vigdis Vandvik
{"title":"高寒草地植物功能群的相互作用随着气候变暖而加剧","authors":"Francesca Jaroszynska,&nbsp;Siri Lie Olsen,&nbsp;Ragnhild Gya,&nbsp;Kari Klanderud,&nbsp;Richard Telford,&nbsp;Vigdis Vandvik","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plant–plant interactions regulate plant community structure and function. Shifts in these interactions due to global climate change, mediated through disproportional increases of certain species or functional groups, may strongly affect plant community properties. Still, we lack knowledge of community-level effects of climate-driven changes in biotic interactions. We examined plant community interactions by experimentally removing a dominant functional group, graminoids, in semi-natural grasslands in Southern Norway. To test whether the effect of graminoid removal varied with climate, the experiment was replicated across broad-scale temperature and precipitation gradients. To quantify community-level interactions across sites, we tested for changes in the remaining vascular community (i.e. forbs) cover, richness, evenness, and functional traits reflecting leaf-economic investment and plant size over five years. The effect of graminoid removal on forb community structure and functioning varied over time, and along the climate gradients. Forb cover increased in response to graminoid removal, especially at warmer sites. Species richness increased following removal irrespective of climate, whilst evenness increased under warmer and wetter conditions irrespective of removal. No climate or removal effect was found for species turnover. Functional trait responses varied along the precipitation gradient – compared to controls, forb mean SLA decreased in drier conditions after graminoid removal. Leaf thickness increased under cooler and drier conditions irrespective of removal. These community structure alterations demonstrate stronger competitive interactions between forbs and graminoids under warmer conditions, whilst functional trait responses indicate a facilitative effect of graminoids under drier conditions. This indicates that both competition and facilitation regulate plant communities, suggesting complexity when scaling from populations to communities. Finally, both temperature and precipitation determine the direction and intensity of biotic interactions, with ecosystem-wide implications for forb persistence and ecosystem functioning under future climates. Further work is needed to generalise the role of changing interactions in mediating community responses to climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2024 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecog.07018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plant functional group interactions intensify with warming in alpine grasslands\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Jaroszynska,&nbsp;Siri Lie Olsen,&nbsp;Ragnhild Gya,&nbsp;Kari Klanderud,&nbsp;Richard Telford,&nbsp;Vigdis Vandvik\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecog.07018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Plant–plant interactions regulate plant community structure and function. Shifts in these interactions due to global climate change, mediated through disproportional increases of certain species or functional groups, may strongly affect plant community properties. Still, we lack knowledge of community-level effects of climate-driven changes in biotic interactions. We examined plant community interactions by experimentally removing a dominant functional group, graminoids, in semi-natural grasslands in Southern Norway. To test whether the effect of graminoid removal varied with climate, the experiment was replicated across broad-scale temperature and precipitation gradients. To quantify community-level interactions across sites, we tested for changes in the remaining vascular community (i.e. forbs) cover, richness, evenness, and functional traits reflecting leaf-economic investment and plant size over five years. The effect of graminoid removal on forb community structure and functioning varied over time, and along the climate gradients. Forb cover increased in response to graminoid removal, especially at warmer sites. Species richness increased following removal irrespective of climate, whilst evenness increased under warmer and wetter conditions irrespective of removal. No climate or removal effect was found for species turnover. Functional trait responses varied along the precipitation gradient – compared to controls, forb mean SLA decreased in drier conditions after graminoid removal. Leaf thickness increased under cooler and drier conditions irrespective of removal. These community structure alterations demonstrate stronger competitive interactions between forbs and graminoids under warmer conditions, whilst functional trait responses indicate a facilitative effect of graminoids under drier conditions. This indicates that both competition and facilitation regulate plant communities, suggesting complexity when scaling from populations to communities. Finally, both temperature and precipitation determine the direction and intensity of biotic interactions, with ecosystem-wide implications for forb persistence and ecosystem functioning under future climates. Further work is needed to generalise the role of changing interactions in mediating community responses to climate change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":\"2024 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecog.07018\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.07018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.07018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物与植物之间的相互作用调节着植物群落的结构和功能。全球气候变化导致的这些相互作用的变化,通过某些物种或功能群的不成比例的增加,可能会对植物群落的特性产生强烈影响。然而,我们仍然缺乏有关气候驱动的生物相互作用变化对群落层面影响的知识。我们通过实验移除挪威南部半自然草地上的优势功能群--禾本科植物,考察了植物群落的相互作用。为了检验移除禾本科植物的效果是否随气候而变化,我们在大尺度的温度和降水梯度上重复了该实验。为了量化不同地点群落层面的相互作用,我们测试了五年来剩余维管群落(即草本植物)的覆盖度、丰富度、均匀度以及反映叶经济投资和植物大小的功能特征的变化。移除禾本科植物对草本群落结构和功能的影响随时间和气候梯度而变化。清除禾本科植物后,草本植物的覆盖率增加,尤其是在较温暖的地点。无论气候如何,物种丰富度在移除禾本科植物后都会增加;无论移除与否,均匀度在温暖潮湿的条件下都会增加。物种更替率没有受到气候或移除的影响。功能特征反应随降水梯度而变化--与对照组相比,移除禾本科植物后,在较干燥的条件下,平均SLA降低。无论是否移除禾本科植物,叶片厚度都会在更凉爽和更干燥的条件下增加。这些群落结构的变化表明,在较温暖的条件下,草本植物与禾本科植物之间的竞争性相互作用更强,而功能特征反应则表明,在较干旱的条件下,禾本科植物具有促进作用。这表明,竞争和促进作用对植物群落都有调节作用,这表明从种群到群落的扩展具有复杂性。最后,温度和降水决定了生物相互作用的方向和强度,对未来气候条件下禁猎区的持久性和生态系统的功能具有全生态系统的影响。还需要进一步的工作,以概括不断变化的相互作用在调解群落对气候变化的反应中所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Plant functional group interactions intensify with warming in alpine grasslands

Plant–plant interactions regulate plant community structure and function. Shifts in these interactions due to global climate change, mediated through disproportional increases of certain species or functional groups, may strongly affect plant community properties. Still, we lack knowledge of community-level effects of climate-driven changes in biotic interactions. We examined plant community interactions by experimentally removing a dominant functional group, graminoids, in semi-natural grasslands in Southern Norway. To test whether the effect of graminoid removal varied with climate, the experiment was replicated across broad-scale temperature and precipitation gradients. To quantify community-level interactions across sites, we tested for changes in the remaining vascular community (i.e. forbs) cover, richness, evenness, and functional traits reflecting leaf-economic investment and plant size over five years. The effect of graminoid removal on forb community structure and functioning varied over time, and along the climate gradients. Forb cover increased in response to graminoid removal, especially at warmer sites. Species richness increased following removal irrespective of climate, whilst evenness increased under warmer and wetter conditions irrespective of removal. No climate or removal effect was found for species turnover. Functional trait responses varied along the precipitation gradient – compared to controls, forb mean SLA decreased in drier conditions after graminoid removal. Leaf thickness increased under cooler and drier conditions irrespective of removal. These community structure alterations demonstrate stronger competitive interactions between forbs and graminoids under warmer conditions, whilst functional trait responses indicate a facilitative effect of graminoids under drier conditions. This indicates that both competition and facilitation regulate plant communities, suggesting complexity when scaling from populations to communities. Finally, both temperature and precipitation determine the direction and intensity of biotic interactions, with ecosystem-wide implications for forb persistence and ecosystem functioning under future climates. Further work is needed to generalise the role of changing interactions in mediating community responses to climate change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
期刊最新文献
Colonization and extinction lags drive non-linear responses to warming in mountain plant communities across the Northern Hemisphere Differential predation patterns of free-ranging cats among continents Competitive interactions modify the direct effects of climate Achieving higher standards in species distribution modeling by leveraging the diversity of available software Seasonal macro-demography of North American bird populations revealed through participatory science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1