Mehr Gupta , Kat Bogatyreva , Kiran Pienaar , Hassan Vally , Catherine M. Bennett
{"title":"墨尔本三角洲疫潮期间当地 SARS-Cov-2 爆发的时间和疫苗接种覆盖率。","authors":"Mehr Gupta , Kat Bogatyreva , Kiran Pienaar , Hassan Vally , Catherine M. Bennett","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This article presents a longitudinal analysis of COVID-19 infection and vaccination coverage in Melbourne metropolitan local government areas (LGAs) during the 2021 Delta wave.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>COVID-19 vaccination and infection data from 12 July to 27 November 2021 were sourced from government websites. Summary statistics and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were compared by LGA ranked according to socioeconomic status: total “burden” (total infections per thousand), “peak” (highest weekly infection rate), “lag” (interval between peak and 70% double vaccination).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>LGAs in the bottom five deciles for social advantage experienced higher infection rates (39.0 per thousand [95% CI: 38.5, 39.5] <em>vs.</em> 14.8 [14.7, 14.9]), and had lower two-dose vaccination coverage (23.8% [23.6, 23.9] <em>vs.</em> 32.7% [32.6, 32.7]) compared with LGAs in the top five deciles. LGAs that achieved 70% coverage two weeks or more after the infection peak experienced nearly twice the total infection burden (27.7 per 1000 [27.3, 28.0] compared with 14.9 [14.7, 15.0]) than LGAs with a shorter lag.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Exposure and transmission risk factors cluster within disadvantaged LGAs. The potential for large local outbreaks is heightened if vaccination uptake trails in these communities.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Public Health</h3><p>In a pandemic, decision-makers must prioritise disease control and harm reduction interventions for at-risk LGAs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 4","pages":"Article 100164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000396/pdfft?md5=742c265e5dd1987abbfabec0fbb406d4&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020024000396-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The timing of local SARS-Cov-2 outbreaks and vaccination coverage during the Delta wave in Melbourne\",\"authors\":\"Mehr Gupta , Kat Bogatyreva , Kiran Pienaar , Hassan Vally , Catherine M. Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This article presents a longitudinal analysis of COVID-19 infection and vaccination coverage in Melbourne metropolitan local government areas (LGAs) during the 2021 Delta wave.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>COVID-19 vaccination and infection data from 12 July to 27 November 2021 were sourced from government websites. Summary statistics and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were compared by LGA ranked according to socioeconomic status: total “burden” (total infections per thousand), “peak” (highest weekly infection rate), “lag” (interval between peak and 70% double vaccination).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>LGAs in the bottom five deciles for social advantage experienced higher infection rates (39.0 per thousand [95% CI: 38.5, 39.5] <em>vs.</em> 14.8 [14.7, 14.9]), and had lower two-dose vaccination coverage (23.8% [23.6, 23.9] <em>vs.</em> 32.7% [32.6, 32.7]) compared with LGAs in the top five deciles. LGAs that achieved 70% coverage two weeks or more after the infection peak experienced nearly twice the total infection burden (27.7 per 1000 [27.3, 28.0] compared with 14.9 [14.7, 15.0]) than LGAs with a shorter lag.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Exposure and transmission risk factors cluster within disadvantaged LGAs. The potential for large local outbreaks is heightened if vaccination uptake trails in these communities.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Public Health</h3><p>In a pandemic, decision-makers must prioritise disease control and harm reduction interventions for at-risk LGAs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000396/pdfft?md5=742c265e5dd1987abbfabec0fbb406d4&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020024000396-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000396\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000396","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The timing of local SARS-Cov-2 outbreaks and vaccination coverage during the Delta wave in Melbourne
Objective
This article presents a longitudinal analysis of COVID-19 infection and vaccination coverage in Melbourne metropolitan local government areas (LGAs) during the 2021 Delta wave.
Methods
COVID-19 vaccination and infection data from 12 July to 27 November 2021 were sourced from government websites. Summary statistics and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were compared by LGA ranked according to socioeconomic status: total “burden” (total infections per thousand), “peak” (highest weekly infection rate), “lag” (interval between peak and 70% double vaccination).
Results
LGAs in the bottom five deciles for social advantage experienced higher infection rates (39.0 per thousand [95% CI: 38.5, 39.5] vs. 14.8 [14.7, 14.9]), and had lower two-dose vaccination coverage (23.8% [23.6, 23.9] vs. 32.7% [32.6, 32.7]) compared with LGAs in the top five deciles. LGAs that achieved 70% coverage two weeks or more after the infection peak experienced nearly twice the total infection burden (27.7 per 1000 [27.3, 28.0] compared with 14.9 [14.7, 15.0]) than LGAs with a shorter lag.
Conclusions
Exposure and transmission risk factors cluster within disadvantaged LGAs. The potential for large local outbreaks is heightened if vaccination uptake trails in these communities.
Implications for Public Health
In a pandemic, decision-makers must prioritise disease control and harm reduction interventions for at-risk LGAs.
期刊介绍:
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.