特发性帕金森病根性神经痛的患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 12.5 1区 医学 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY Ageing Research Reviews Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.arr.2024.102374
Leonardo Gomes Pereira , Patrícia Rodrigues , Fernanda Tibolla Viero , Sabrina Qader Kudsi , Julia Maria Frare , Chaiane Tais Rech , Gabriela Graiczicki , Gabriela Trevisan
{"title":"特发性帕金森病根性神经痛的患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Leonardo Gomes Pereira ,&nbsp;Patrícia Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Fernanda Tibolla Viero ,&nbsp;Sabrina Qader Kudsi ,&nbsp;Julia Maria Frare ,&nbsp;Chaiane Tais Rech ,&nbsp;Gabriela Graiczicki ,&nbsp;Gabriela Trevisan","doi":"10.1016/j.arr.2024.102374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Parkinson's disease (PD) is estimated to impact up to 1 % of the global population aged 60 years and older. Among the non-motor manifestations of idiopathic PD, radicular neuropathic pain emerges as a noteworthy concern due to its potential for debility in affected individuals. In, this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of radicular neuropathic pain and thus provide evidence of how this painful symptom affects the lives of patients with idiopathic PD. We registered the research protocol for this study in PROSPERO (CRD42022327220). We searched the Embase, Scopus, and PubMed platforms for studies on PD and neuropathic pain until April 2023. The search yielded 36 articles considered to have a low risk of bias. The prevalence of radicular neuropathic pain in patients with PD was 12.7 %, without a difference when we consider the duration of diagnosis (cut-off &lt; 7 years) or levodopa dosage (cut-off &lt;600 mg/dL). Moreover, there was no variation in the prevalence of radicular neuropathic pain regarding a Hoehn and Yahr stage cut-off of &lt;2.5 or &gt;2.5. Of note, a limited number of patients received pain treatment (21.5 %). We also found that the source of publication bias is the use of the Ford criteria (FC), suggesting that this type of diagnostic criteria may contribute to an underdiagnosis of radicular neuropathic pain in patients with PD. This study underlines the necessity for a more discerning and comprehensive approach to the diagnosis and management of radicular neuropathic pain in patients with idiopathic PD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55545,"journal":{"name":"Ageing Research Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of radicular neuropathic pain in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Gomes Pereira ,&nbsp;Patrícia Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Fernanda Tibolla Viero ,&nbsp;Sabrina Qader Kudsi ,&nbsp;Julia Maria Frare ,&nbsp;Chaiane Tais Rech ,&nbsp;Gabriela Graiczicki ,&nbsp;Gabriela Trevisan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arr.2024.102374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Parkinson's disease (PD) is estimated to impact up to 1 % of the global population aged 60 years and older. Among the non-motor manifestations of idiopathic PD, radicular neuropathic pain emerges as a noteworthy concern due to its potential for debility in affected individuals. In, this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of radicular neuropathic pain and thus provide evidence of how this painful symptom affects the lives of patients with idiopathic PD. We registered the research protocol for this study in PROSPERO (CRD42022327220). We searched the Embase, Scopus, and PubMed platforms for studies on PD and neuropathic pain until April 2023. The search yielded 36 articles considered to have a low risk of bias. The prevalence of radicular neuropathic pain in patients with PD was 12.7 %, without a difference when we consider the duration of diagnosis (cut-off &lt; 7 years) or levodopa dosage (cut-off &lt;600 mg/dL). Moreover, there was no variation in the prevalence of radicular neuropathic pain regarding a Hoehn and Yahr stage cut-off of &lt;2.5 or &gt;2.5. Of note, a limited number of patients received pain treatment (21.5 %). We also found that the source of publication bias is the use of the Ford criteria (FC), suggesting that this type of diagnostic criteria may contribute to an underdiagnosis of radicular neuropathic pain in patients with PD. This study underlines the necessity for a more discerning and comprehensive approach to the diagnosis and management of radicular neuropathic pain in patients with idiopathic PD.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ageing Research Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ageing Research Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163724001922\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163724001922","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据估计,帕金森病(PD)对全球 60 岁及以上人口的影响高达 1%。在特发性帕金森病的非运动表现中,根性神经痛是一个值得关注的问题,因为它有可能导致患者衰弱。在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们旨在评估根性神经痛的患病率,从而为这一疼痛症状如何影响特发性帕金森病患者的生活提供证据。我们在 PROSPERO(CRD42022327220)上注册了本研究的研究方案。我们在 Embase、Scopus 和 PubMed 平台上检索了截至 2023 年 4 月有关帕金森病和神经病理性疼痛的研究。检索结果显示,有 36 篇文章被认为偏倚风险较低。在帕金森病患者中,根性神经痛的发病率为12.7%,如果考虑到诊断时间(截止时间小于7年)或左旋多巴剂量(截止时间为2.5毫克/分钟),两者之间没有差异。值得注意的是,接受疼痛治疗的患者人数有限(21.5%)。我们还发现,发表偏倚的来源是福特标准(FC)的使用,这表明这种诊断标准可能会导致对帕金森病患者根性神经病理性疼痛的诊断不足。本研究强调,在诊断和管理特发性帕金森病患者的根性神经病理性疼痛时,有必要采用更具鉴别力和更全面的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of radicular neuropathic pain in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Parkinson's disease (PD) is estimated to impact up to 1 % of the global population aged 60 years and older. Among the non-motor manifestations of idiopathic PD, radicular neuropathic pain emerges as a noteworthy concern due to its potential for debility in affected individuals. In, this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of radicular neuropathic pain and thus provide evidence of how this painful symptom affects the lives of patients with idiopathic PD. We registered the research protocol for this study in PROSPERO (CRD42022327220). We searched the Embase, Scopus, and PubMed platforms for studies on PD and neuropathic pain until April 2023. The search yielded 36 articles considered to have a low risk of bias. The prevalence of radicular neuropathic pain in patients with PD was 12.7 %, without a difference when we consider the duration of diagnosis (cut-off < 7 years) or levodopa dosage (cut-off <600 mg/dL). Moreover, there was no variation in the prevalence of radicular neuropathic pain regarding a Hoehn and Yahr stage cut-off of <2.5 or >2.5. Of note, a limited number of patients received pain treatment (21.5 %). We also found that the source of publication bias is the use of the Ford criteria (FC), suggesting that this type of diagnostic criteria may contribute to an underdiagnosis of radicular neuropathic pain in patients with PD. This study underlines the necessity for a more discerning and comprehensive approach to the diagnosis and management of radicular neuropathic pain in patients with idiopathic PD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ageing Research Reviews
Ageing Research Reviews 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
216
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: With the rise in average human life expectancy, the impact of ageing and age-related diseases on our society has become increasingly significant. Ageing research is now a focal point for numerous laboratories, encompassing leaders in genetics, molecular and cellular biology, biochemistry, and behavior. Ageing Research Reviews (ARR) serves as a cornerstone in this field, addressing emerging trends. ARR aims to fill a substantial gap by providing critical reviews and viewpoints on evolving discoveries concerning the mechanisms of ageing and age-related diseases. The rapid progress in understanding the mechanisms controlling cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival is unveiling new insights into the regulation of ageing. From telomerase to stem cells, and from energy to oxyradical metabolism, we are witnessing an exciting era in the multidisciplinary field of ageing research. The journal explores the cellular and molecular foundations of interventions that extend lifespan, such as caloric restriction. It identifies the underpinnings of manipulations that extend lifespan, shedding light on novel approaches for preventing age-related diseases. ARR publishes articles on focused topics selected from the expansive field of ageing research, with a particular emphasis on the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the aging process. This includes age-related diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and neurodegenerative disorders. The journal also covers applications of basic ageing research to lifespan extension and disease prevention, offering a comprehensive platform for advancing our understanding of this critical field.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Exercise-induced adaptive response of different immune organs during ageing Aging, brain plasticity, and motor learning Gut microbiome and Alzheimer’s disease: What we know and what remains to be explored Application of frailty screening instruments for older people in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1