英国常规初级保健数据中报告的孕前指标及其与健康结果的关系:系统性综述。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-30 Print Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0082
Danielle Schoenaker, Elizabeth M Lovegrove, Emma H Cassinelli, Jennifer Hall, Majel McGranahan, Laura McGowan, Helen Carr, Nisreen A Alwan, Judith Stephenson, Keith M Godfrey
{"title":"英国常规初级保健数据中报告的孕前指标及其与健康结果的关系:系统性综述。","authors":"Danielle Schoenaker, Elizabeth M Lovegrove, Emma H Cassinelli, Jennifer Hall, Majel McGranahan, Laura McGowan, Helen Carr, Nisreen A Alwan, Judith Stephenson, Keith M Godfrey","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Routine primary care data may be a valuable resource for preconception health research and to inform the provision of preconception care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To review how primary care data could provide information on the prevalence of preconception indicators and examine associations with maternal and offspring health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Systematic review of observational studies using UK routine primary care data.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Literature searches were conducted in March 2023 using five databases to identify observational studies that used national primary care data from individuals aged 15-49 years. Preconception indicators were defined as medical, behavioural, and social factors that may impact future pregnancies; health outcomes included those that may occur during and after pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 5259 screened records, 42 articles were included. The prevalence of 37 preconception indicator measures was described for female patients, ranging from 0.01% for sickle cell disease to >20% for each of advanced maternal age, previous caesarean section (among those with a recorded pregnancy), overweight, obesity, smoking, depression, and anxiety (irrespective of pregnancy). Few studies reported indicators for male patients (<i>n</i> = 3) or associations with outcomes (<i>n</i> = 5). Most studies had a low risk of bias, but missing data may limit generalisability of the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings demonstrated that routinely collected UK primary care data could be used to identify patients' preconception care needs. Linking primary care data with health outcomes collected in other datasets is underutilised, but could help to quantify how optimising preconception health and care could reduce adverse outcomes for mothers and children.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e129-e136"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preconception indicators and associations with health outcomes reported in UK routine primary care data: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Schoenaker, Elizabeth M Lovegrove, Emma H Cassinelli, Jennifer Hall, Majel McGranahan, Laura McGowan, Helen Carr, Nisreen A Alwan, Judith Stephenson, Keith M Godfrey\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Routine primary care data may be a valuable resource for preconception health research and to inform the provision of preconception care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To review how primary care data could provide information on the prevalence of preconception indicators and examine associations with maternal and offspring health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Systematic review of observational studies using UK routine primary care data.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Literature searches were conducted in March 2023 using five databases to identify observational studies that used national primary care data from individuals aged 15-49 years. Preconception indicators were defined as medical, behavioural, and social factors that may impact future pregnancies; health outcomes included those that may occur during and after pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 5259 screened records, 42 articles were included. The prevalence of 37 preconception indicator measures was described for female patients, ranging from 0.01% for sickle cell disease to >20% for each of advanced maternal age, previous caesarean section (among those with a recorded pregnancy), overweight, obesity, smoking, depression, and anxiety (irrespective of pregnancy). Few studies reported indicators for male patients (<i>n</i> = 3) or associations with outcomes (<i>n</i> = 5). Most studies had a low risk of bias, but missing data may limit generalisability of the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings demonstrated that routinely collected UK primary care data could be used to identify patients' preconception care needs. Linking primary care data with health outcomes collected in other datasets is underutilised, but could help to quantify how optimising preconception health and care could reduce adverse outcomes for mothers and children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e129-e136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755573/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0082\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:常规初级保健数据可能是孕前健康研究和提供孕前保健信息的宝贵资源。目的:回顾初级保健数据如何提供有关孕前指标流行率的信息,并检查与孕产妇和后代健康结果的关联:使用英国常规初级保健数据对观察性研究进行系统回顾:在五个数据库(2023 年 3 月)中进行文献检索,以确定使用 15-49 岁个体的全国初级保健数据进行的观察性研究。孕前指标被定义为可能影响未来怀孕的医疗、行为和社会因素。健康结果包括怀孕期间和怀孕后可能出现的健康结果。筛选、数据提取和质量评估由两名审查员进行:从筛选出的 5259 条记录中,共纳入 42 篇文章。其中对女性患者的 30 项孕前指标进行了描述,范围从镰状细胞病的 0.01% 到高龄产妇、既往剖腹产(有怀孕记录者)、超重、肥胖、吸烟、抑郁和焦虑(无论是否怀孕)的 20% 以上不等。很少有研究报告男性患者的指标(3 项)或与结果的关联(5 项)。大多数研究的偏倚风险较低,但数据缺失可能会限制研究的普遍性:研究结果表明,常规收集的英国初级保健数据可用于确定患者的孕前保健需求。将初级保健数据与其他数据集收集的健康结果联系起来的做法尚未得到充分利用,但有助于量化优化孕前保健和护理可如何减少对母亲和儿童的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preconception indicators and associations with health outcomes reported in UK routine primary care data: a systematic review.

Background: Routine primary care data may be a valuable resource for preconception health research and to inform the provision of preconception care.

Aim: To review how primary care data could provide information on the prevalence of preconception indicators and examine associations with maternal and offspring health outcomes.

Design and setting: Systematic review of observational studies using UK routine primary care data.

Method: Literature searches were conducted in March 2023 using five databases to identify observational studies that used national primary care data from individuals aged 15-49 years. Preconception indicators were defined as medical, behavioural, and social factors that may impact future pregnancies; health outcomes included those that may occur during and after pregnancy.

Results: From 5259 screened records, 42 articles were included. The prevalence of 37 preconception indicator measures was described for female patients, ranging from 0.01% for sickle cell disease to >20% for each of advanced maternal age, previous caesarean section (among those with a recorded pregnancy), overweight, obesity, smoking, depression, and anxiety (irrespective of pregnancy). Few studies reported indicators for male patients (n = 3) or associations with outcomes (n = 5). Most studies had a low risk of bias, but missing data may limit generalisability of the findings.

Conclusion: The findings demonstrated that routinely collected UK primary care data could be used to identify patients' preconception care needs. Linking primary care data with health outcomes collected in other datasets is underutilised, but could help to quantify how optimising preconception health and care could reduce adverse outcomes for mothers and children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing. Discussions about physical activity in general practice: analysis of video-recorded consultations. Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Paramedic or GP consultations in primary care: prospective study comparing costs and outcomes. Exploring rural Scottish GPs' migration decisions: a secondary qualitative analysis considering burnout.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1