建立交通事故死亡模型,评估性别在道路安全中的重要性

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101254
Hemanthini Allirani, Ashish Verma
{"title":"建立交通事故死亡模型,评估性别在道路安全中的重要性","authors":"Hemanthini Allirani,&nbsp;Ashish Verma","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Road crashes continue to be the leading cause of death across all age groups despite several efforts being taken by the government and non-government organizations. The brunt of traffic fatalities affects males and females differently. Studies on assessing gender-wise exposure to road safety are limited in the Indian context. Therefore, an attempt is made to understand the role of gender in fatality risk assessment. The aim is to evaluate the change in exposure to different motorization growth scenarios for males and females. The fatality-risk model is developed based on the interaction between the victim (pedestrian, bicyclist, two-wheeler, car, and bus) and threat (pedestrian, bicyclist, two-wheeler, car, bus, and environment) road users combined with the at-risk distance traveled by modes for Bangalore Metropolitan Region, India. Male and female traffic fatalities are estimated based on the interaction severity between victim and threat modes. The results show that pedestrians, bicyclists, and two-wheeler users are more vulnerable. Both males and females demonstrate an increased risk of traffic fatalities with the rise in the motorization mode share due to the severity of interaction of vulnerable modes with another motorized mode such as two-wheelers and cars. The most significant reduction in road crashes for both genders is observed for the High Bus scenario, which assumes that 80 % of the total motorized distance is traveled by bus. Maximum traffic deaths are estimated for the High Car scenario; the fatalities remained high even with 100 % motorization indicating higher risk with high motorization rates. The study outcomes would help practitioners and decision-makers to make informed policy decisions. Further, the fatality risk is assessed considering the interaction of at most two road users, and the study can be extended to the simultaneous evaluation of multiple road users.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling traffic fatalities to assess the significance of gender in road safety\",\"authors\":\"Hemanthini Allirani,&nbsp;Ashish Verma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Road crashes continue to be the leading cause of death across all age groups despite several efforts being taken by the government and non-government organizations. The brunt of traffic fatalities affects males and females differently. Studies on assessing gender-wise exposure to road safety are limited in the Indian context. Therefore, an attempt is made to understand the role of gender in fatality risk assessment. The aim is to evaluate the change in exposure to different motorization growth scenarios for males and females. The fatality-risk model is developed based on the interaction between the victim (pedestrian, bicyclist, two-wheeler, car, and bus) and threat (pedestrian, bicyclist, two-wheeler, car, bus, and environment) road users combined with the at-risk distance traveled by modes for Bangalore Metropolitan Region, India. Male and female traffic fatalities are estimated based on the interaction severity between victim and threat modes. The results show that pedestrians, bicyclists, and two-wheeler users are more vulnerable. Both males and females demonstrate an increased risk of traffic fatalities with the rise in the motorization mode share due to the severity of interaction of vulnerable modes with another motorized mode such as two-wheelers and cars. The most significant reduction in road crashes for both genders is observed for the High Bus scenario, which assumes that 80 % of the total motorized distance is traveled by bus. Maximum traffic deaths are estimated for the High Car scenario; the fatalities remained high even with 100 % motorization indicating higher risk with high motorization rates. The study outcomes would help practitioners and decision-makers to make informed policy decisions. Further, the fatality risk is assessed considering the interaction of at most two road users, and the study can be extended to the simultaneous evaluation of multiple road users.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24001093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24001093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管政府和非政府组织做出了许多努力,但道路交通事故仍然是造成各年龄段人群死亡的主要原因。交通死亡事故对男性和女性的影响不同。在印度,按性别评估道路安全风险的研究十分有限。因此,我们试图了解性别在死亡风险评估中的作用。目的是评估男性和女性在不同机动化增长情况下的风险变化。死亡风险模型是基于受害者(行人、骑自行车的人、两轮摩托车、汽车和公共汽车)和威胁(行人、骑自行车的人、两轮摩托车、汽车、公共汽车和环境)道路使用者之间的相互作用,结合印度班加罗尔大都会地区各种交通方式的风险行驶距离而开发的。根据受害者和威胁模式之间的交互严重程度,估算了男性和女性的交通死亡人数。结果显示,行人、骑自行车者和两轮车使用者更容易受到伤害。随着机动化模式所占比例的增加,男性和女性的交通死亡风险也随之增加,这是因为弱势模式与另一种机动化模式(如两轮车和汽车)之间相互作用的严重程度不同。在 "公交车占比高 "情景下,男女交通事故的减少幅度最大,该情景假定公交车的行驶距离占机动车总行驶距离的 80%。据估计,"高汽车 "方案的交通事故死亡人数最多;即使机动化率达到 100%,死亡人数仍然很高,这表明机动化率越高风险越大。研究结果将有助于从业人员和决策者做出明智的决策。此外,死亡风险的评估考虑了最多两个道路使用者的相互作用,该研究可扩展至同时评估多个道路使用者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling traffic fatalities to assess the significance of gender in road safety

Road crashes continue to be the leading cause of death across all age groups despite several efforts being taken by the government and non-government organizations. The brunt of traffic fatalities affects males and females differently. Studies on assessing gender-wise exposure to road safety are limited in the Indian context. Therefore, an attempt is made to understand the role of gender in fatality risk assessment. The aim is to evaluate the change in exposure to different motorization growth scenarios for males and females. The fatality-risk model is developed based on the interaction between the victim (pedestrian, bicyclist, two-wheeler, car, and bus) and threat (pedestrian, bicyclist, two-wheeler, car, bus, and environment) road users combined with the at-risk distance traveled by modes for Bangalore Metropolitan Region, India. Male and female traffic fatalities are estimated based on the interaction severity between victim and threat modes. The results show that pedestrians, bicyclists, and two-wheeler users are more vulnerable. Both males and females demonstrate an increased risk of traffic fatalities with the rise in the motorization mode share due to the severity of interaction of vulnerable modes with another motorized mode such as two-wheelers and cars. The most significant reduction in road crashes for both genders is observed for the High Bus scenario, which assumes that 80 % of the total motorized distance is traveled by bus. Maximum traffic deaths are estimated for the High Car scenario; the fatalities remained high even with 100 % motorization indicating higher risk with high motorization rates. The study outcomes would help practitioners and decision-makers to make informed policy decisions. Further, the fatality risk is assessed considering the interaction of at most two road users, and the study can be extended to the simultaneous evaluation of multiple road users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
期刊最新文献
Fuelling the pandemic: The impact of fuel prices on COVID-19 COVID-19 and its influence on the propensity to work from home between March 2020 and June 2021 Simulation modeling of passengers flow at airport terminals to reduce delay and enhance level of service Optimization of transport sustainability index to conserve resources: A case study of Delhi, India The effect of airline service quality, perceived value, emotional attachment, and brand loyalty on passengers’ willingness to pay: The moderating role of airline origin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1