深度学习模型在临床部署后性能下降:前列腺癌放射治疗自动分割案例研究

IF 6.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Machine Learning Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1088/2632-2153/ad580f
Biling Wang, Michael Dohopolski, Ti Bai, Junjie Wu, Raquibul Hannan, Neil Desai, Aurelie Garant, Daniel Yang, Dan Nguyen, Mu-Han Lin, Robert Timmerman, Xinlei Wang and Steve B Jiang
{"title":"深度学习模型在临床部署后性能下降:前列腺癌放射治疗自动分割案例研究","authors":"Biling Wang, Michael Dohopolski, Ti Bai, Junjie Wu, Raquibul Hannan, Neil Desai, Aurelie Garant, Daniel Yang, Dan Nguyen, Mu-Han Lin, Robert Timmerman, Xinlei Wang and Steve B Jiang","doi":"10.1088/2632-2153/ad580f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our study aims to explore the long-term performance patterns for deep learning (DL) models deployed in clinic and to investigate their efficacy in relation to evolving clinical practices. We conducted a retrospective study simulating the clinical implementation of our DL model involving 1328 prostate cancer patients treated between January 2006 and August 2022. We trained and validated a U-Net-based auto-segmentation model on data obtained from 2006 to 2011 and tested on data from 2012 to 2022, simulating the model’s clinical deployment starting in 2012. We visualized the trends of the model performance using exponentially weighted moving average (EMA) curves. Additionally, we performed Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test and multiple linear regression to investigate Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) variations across distinct periods and the impact of clinical factors, respectively. Initially, from 2012 to 2014, the model showed high performance in segmenting the prostate, rectum, and bladder. Post-2015, a notable decline in EMA DSC was observed for the prostate and rectum, while bladder contours remained stable. Key factors impacting the prostate contour quality included physician contouring styles, using various hydrogel spacers, CT scan slice thickness, MRI-guided contouring, and intravenous (IV) contrast (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, p = 0.0085, p = 0.0012, p < 0.0001, respectively). Rectum contour quality was notably influenced by factors such as slice thickness, physician contouring styles, and the use of various hydrogel spacers. The quality of the bladder contour was primarily affected by IV contrast. The deployed DL model exhibited a substantial decline in performance over time, aligning with the evolving clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":33757,"journal":{"name":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance deterioration of deep learning models after clinical deployment: a case study with auto-segmentation for definitive prostate cancer radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Biling Wang, Michael Dohopolski, Ti Bai, Junjie Wu, Raquibul Hannan, Neil Desai, Aurelie Garant, Daniel Yang, Dan Nguyen, Mu-Han Lin, Robert Timmerman, Xinlei Wang and Steve B Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2632-2153/ad580f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our study aims to explore the long-term performance patterns for deep learning (DL) models deployed in clinic and to investigate their efficacy in relation to evolving clinical practices. We conducted a retrospective study simulating the clinical implementation of our DL model involving 1328 prostate cancer patients treated between January 2006 and August 2022. We trained and validated a U-Net-based auto-segmentation model on data obtained from 2006 to 2011 and tested on data from 2012 to 2022, simulating the model’s clinical deployment starting in 2012. We visualized the trends of the model performance using exponentially weighted moving average (EMA) curves. Additionally, we performed Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test and multiple linear regression to investigate Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) variations across distinct periods and the impact of clinical factors, respectively. Initially, from 2012 to 2014, the model showed high performance in segmenting the prostate, rectum, and bladder. Post-2015, a notable decline in EMA DSC was observed for the prostate and rectum, while bladder contours remained stable. Key factors impacting the prostate contour quality included physician contouring styles, using various hydrogel spacers, CT scan slice thickness, MRI-guided contouring, and intravenous (IV) contrast (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, p = 0.0085, p = 0.0012, p < 0.0001, respectively). Rectum contour quality was notably influenced by factors such as slice thickness, physician contouring styles, and the use of various hydrogel spacers. The quality of the bladder contour was primarily affected by IV contrast. The deployed DL model exhibited a substantial decline in performance over time, aligning with the evolving clinical settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Machine Learning Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Machine Learning Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad580f\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad580f","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的研究旨在探索部署在临床中的深度学习(DL)模型的长期性能模式,并研究其与不断发展的临床实践相关的功效。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,模拟了我们的深度学习模型的临床实施情况,涉及 2006 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月期间接受治疗的 1328 名前列腺癌患者。我们在 2006 年至 2011 年获得的数据上训练并验证了基于 U-Net 的自动分割模型,并在 2012 年至 2022 年的数据上进行了测试,模拟了模型从 2012 年开始的临床部署。我们使用指数加权移动平均(EMA)曲线直观地显示了模型性能的变化趋势。此外,我们还进行了Wilcoxon秩和检验和多元线性回归,分别研究了不同时期的Dice相似系数(DSC)变化和临床因素的影响。最初,从 2012 年到 2014 年,该模型在分割前列腺、直肠和膀胱方面表现出很高的性能。2015 年后,前列腺和直肠的 EMA DSC 显著下降,而膀胱轮廓则保持稳定。影响前列腺轮廓质量的关键因素包括医生的轮廓塑造方式、使用的各种水凝胶垫片、CT 扫描切片厚度、MRI 引导下的轮廓塑造以及静脉注射 (IV) 造影剂(分别为 p < 0.0001、p < 0.0001、p = 0.0085、p = 0.0012、p < 0.0001)。直肠轮廓质量明显受到切片厚度、医生轮廓设计风格和各种水凝胶垫片使用等因素的影响。膀胱轮廓的质量主要受静脉注射对比剂的影响。随着时间的推移,部署的 DL 模型的性能大幅下降,这与不断变化的临床环境相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance deterioration of deep learning models after clinical deployment: a case study with auto-segmentation for definitive prostate cancer radiotherapy
Our study aims to explore the long-term performance patterns for deep learning (DL) models deployed in clinic and to investigate their efficacy in relation to evolving clinical practices. We conducted a retrospective study simulating the clinical implementation of our DL model involving 1328 prostate cancer patients treated between January 2006 and August 2022. We trained and validated a U-Net-based auto-segmentation model on data obtained from 2006 to 2011 and tested on data from 2012 to 2022, simulating the model’s clinical deployment starting in 2012. We visualized the trends of the model performance using exponentially weighted moving average (EMA) curves. Additionally, we performed Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test and multiple linear regression to investigate Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) variations across distinct periods and the impact of clinical factors, respectively. Initially, from 2012 to 2014, the model showed high performance in segmenting the prostate, rectum, and bladder. Post-2015, a notable decline in EMA DSC was observed for the prostate and rectum, while bladder contours remained stable. Key factors impacting the prostate contour quality included physician contouring styles, using various hydrogel spacers, CT scan slice thickness, MRI-guided contouring, and intravenous (IV) contrast (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, p = 0.0085, p = 0.0012, p < 0.0001, respectively). Rectum contour quality was notably influenced by factors such as slice thickness, physician contouring styles, and the use of various hydrogel spacers. The quality of the bladder contour was primarily affected by IV contrast. The deployed DL model exhibited a substantial decline in performance over time, aligning with the evolving clinical settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Machine Learning Science and Technology Computer Science-Artificial Intelligence
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Machine Learning Science and Technology is a multidisciplinary open access journal that bridges the application of machine learning across the sciences with advances in machine learning methods and theory as motivated by physical insights. Specifically, articles must fall into one of the following categories: advance the state of machine learning-driven applications in the sciences or make conceptual, methodological or theoretical advances in machine learning with applications to, inspiration from, or motivated by scientific problems.
期刊最新文献
Quality assurance for online adaptive radiotherapy: a secondary dose verification model with geometry-encoded U-Net. Optimizing ZX-diagrams with deep reinforcement learning DiffLense: a conditional diffusion model for super-resolution of gravitational lensing data Equivariant tensor network potentials Masked particle modeling on sets: towards self-supervised high energy physics foundation models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1