将自动微分法与光子逆向设计的邻接法结合起来

IF 6.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Machine Learning Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1088/2632-2153/ad5411
Alexander Luce, Rasoul Alaee, Fabian Knorr and Florian Marquardt
{"title":"将自动微分法与光子逆向设计的邻接法结合起来","authors":"Alexander Luce, Rasoul Alaee, Fabian Knorr and Florian Marquardt","doi":"10.1088/2632-2153/ad5411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimizing the shapes and topology of physical devices is crucial for both scientific and technological advancements, given their wide-ranging implications across numerous industries and research areas. Innovations in shape and topology optimization have been observed across a wide range of fields, notably structural mechanics, fluid mechanics, and more recently, photonics. Gradient-based inverse design techniques have been particularly successful for photonic and optical problems, resulting in integrated, miniaturized hardware that has set new standards in device performance. To calculate the gradients, there are typically two approaches: namely, either by implementing specialized solvers using automatic differentiation (AD) or by deriving analytical solutions for gradient calculation and adjoint sources by hand. In this work, we propose a middle ground and present a hybrid approach that leverages and enables the benefits of AD for handling gradient derivation while using existing, proven but black-box photonic solvers for numerical solutions. Utilizing the adjoint method, we make existing numerical solvers differentiable and seamlessly integrate them into an AD framework. Further, this enables users to integrate the optimization environment seamlessly with other autodifferentiable components such as machine learning, geometry generation, or intricate post-processing which could lead to better photonic design workflows. We illustrate the approach through two distinct photonic optimization problems: optimizing the Purcell factor of a magnetic dipole in the vicinity of an optical nanocavity and enhancing the light extraction efficiency of a µLED.","PeriodicalId":33757,"journal":{"name":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Merging automatic differentiation and the adjoint method for photonic inverse design\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Luce, Rasoul Alaee, Fabian Knorr and Florian Marquardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2632-2153/ad5411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Optimizing the shapes and topology of physical devices is crucial for both scientific and technological advancements, given their wide-ranging implications across numerous industries and research areas. Innovations in shape and topology optimization have been observed across a wide range of fields, notably structural mechanics, fluid mechanics, and more recently, photonics. Gradient-based inverse design techniques have been particularly successful for photonic and optical problems, resulting in integrated, miniaturized hardware that has set new standards in device performance. To calculate the gradients, there are typically two approaches: namely, either by implementing specialized solvers using automatic differentiation (AD) or by deriving analytical solutions for gradient calculation and adjoint sources by hand. In this work, we propose a middle ground and present a hybrid approach that leverages and enables the benefits of AD for handling gradient derivation while using existing, proven but black-box photonic solvers for numerical solutions. Utilizing the adjoint method, we make existing numerical solvers differentiable and seamlessly integrate them into an AD framework. Further, this enables users to integrate the optimization environment seamlessly with other autodifferentiable components such as machine learning, geometry generation, or intricate post-processing which could lead to better photonic design workflows. We illustrate the approach through two distinct photonic optimization problems: optimizing the Purcell factor of a magnetic dipole in the vicinity of an optical nanocavity and enhancing the light extraction efficiency of a µLED.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Machine Learning Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Machine Learning Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad5411\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad5411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

优化物理设备的形状和拓扑结构对科学和技术进步至关重要,因为这对众多行业和研究领域都有广泛影响。形状和拓扑优化方面的创新已经遍及各个领域,特别是结构力学、流体力学和最近的光子学。基于梯度的逆向设计技术在解决光子和光学问题方面尤为成功,其集成化、微型化硬件为设备性能设定了新标准。要计算梯度,通常有两种方法:一是使用自动微分(AD)实现专门的求解器,二是手工推导梯度计算和邻接源的解析解。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个中间方案,并提出了一种混合方法,即利用自动微分的优势处理梯度推导,同时使用现有的、经过验证的黑盒光子求解器进行数值求解。利用邻接法,我们使现有的数值求解器可微分,并将其无缝集成到 AD 框架中。此外,这还能让用户将优化环境与机器学习、几何生成或复杂的后处理等其他自动可微分组件无缝集成,从而实现更好的光子设计工作流程。我们通过两个不同的光子优化问题来说明这种方法:优化光学纳米腔附近磁偶极子的珀塞尔因子和提高 µLED 的光提取效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Merging automatic differentiation and the adjoint method for photonic inverse design
Optimizing the shapes and topology of physical devices is crucial for both scientific and technological advancements, given their wide-ranging implications across numerous industries and research areas. Innovations in shape and topology optimization have been observed across a wide range of fields, notably structural mechanics, fluid mechanics, and more recently, photonics. Gradient-based inverse design techniques have been particularly successful for photonic and optical problems, resulting in integrated, miniaturized hardware that has set new standards in device performance. To calculate the gradients, there are typically two approaches: namely, either by implementing specialized solvers using automatic differentiation (AD) or by deriving analytical solutions for gradient calculation and adjoint sources by hand. In this work, we propose a middle ground and present a hybrid approach that leverages and enables the benefits of AD for handling gradient derivation while using existing, proven but black-box photonic solvers for numerical solutions. Utilizing the adjoint method, we make existing numerical solvers differentiable and seamlessly integrate them into an AD framework. Further, this enables users to integrate the optimization environment seamlessly with other autodifferentiable components such as machine learning, geometry generation, or intricate post-processing which could lead to better photonic design workflows. We illustrate the approach through two distinct photonic optimization problems: optimizing the Purcell factor of a magnetic dipole in the vicinity of an optical nanocavity and enhancing the light extraction efficiency of a µLED.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Machine Learning Science and Technology Computer Science-Artificial Intelligence
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Machine Learning Science and Technology is a multidisciplinary open access journal that bridges the application of machine learning across the sciences with advances in machine learning methods and theory as motivated by physical insights. Specifically, articles must fall into one of the following categories: advance the state of machine learning-driven applications in the sciences or make conceptual, methodological or theoretical advances in machine learning with applications to, inspiration from, or motivated by scientific problems.
期刊最新文献
Quality assurance for online adaptive radiotherapy: a secondary dose verification model with geometry-encoded U-Net. Optimizing ZX-diagrams with deep reinforcement learning DiffLense: a conditional diffusion model for super-resolution of gravitational lensing data Equivariant tensor network potentials Masked particle modeling on sets: towards self-supervised high energy physics foundation models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1