Shamsed Mahmud , Louise E. Pitcher , Elijah Torbenson , Paul D. Robbins , Lei Zhang , Xiao Dong
{"title":"开发作为细胞衰老生物标记的转录组特征。","authors":"Shamsed Mahmud , Louise E. Pitcher , Elijah Torbenson , Paul D. Robbins , Lei Zhang , Xiao Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.arr.2024.102403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cellular senescence is a cell fate driven by different types of stress, where damaged cells exit from the cell cycle and, in many cases, develop an inflammatory senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Senescence has often been linked to driving aging and the onset of multiple diseases conferred by the harmful SASP, which disrupts tissue homeostasis and impairs the regular function of many tissues. This phenomenon was first observed <em>in vitro</em> when fibroblasts halted replication after approximately 50 population doublings. In addition to replication-induced senescence, factors such as DNA damage and oncogene activation can induce cellular senescence both in culture and <em>in vivo</em>. Despite their contribution to aging and disease, identifying senescent cells <em>in vivo</em> has been challenging due to their heterogeneity. Although senescent cells can express the cell cycle inhibitors p16<sup>Ink4a</sup> and/or p21<sup>Cip1</sup> and exhibit SA-ß-gal activity and evidence of a DNA damage response, there is no universal biomarker for these cells, regardless of inducer or cell type. Recent studies have analyzed the transcriptomic characteristics of these cells, leading to the identification of signature gene sets like CellAge, SeneQuest, and SenMayo. Advancements in single-cell and spatial RNA sequencing now allow for analyzing senescent cell heterogeneity within the same tissue and the development of machine learning algorithms, e.g., SenPred, SenSig, and SenCID, to discover cellular senescence using RNA sequencing data. Such insights not only deepen our understanding of the genetic pathways driving cellular senescence, but also promote the development of its quantifiable biomarkers. This review summarizes the current knowledge of transcriptomic signatures of cellular senescence and their potential as <em>in vivo</em> biomarkers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55545,"journal":{"name":"Ageing Research Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing transcriptomic signatures as a biomarker of cellular senescence\",\"authors\":\"Shamsed Mahmud , Louise E. Pitcher , Elijah Torbenson , Paul D. Robbins , Lei Zhang , Xiao Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arr.2024.102403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cellular senescence is a cell fate driven by different types of stress, where damaged cells exit from the cell cycle and, in many cases, develop an inflammatory senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Senescence has often been linked to driving aging and the onset of multiple diseases conferred by the harmful SASP, which disrupts tissue homeostasis and impairs the regular function of many tissues. This phenomenon was first observed <em>in vitro</em> when fibroblasts halted replication after approximately 50 population doublings. In addition to replication-induced senescence, factors such as DNA damage and oncogene activation can induce cellular senescence both in culture and <em>in vivo</em>. Despite their contribution to aging and disease, identifying senescent cells <em>in vivo</em> has been challenging due to their heterogeneity. Although senescent cells can express the cell cycle inhibitors p16<sup>Ink4a</sup> and/or p21<sup>Cip1</sup> and exhibit SA-ß-gal activity and evidence of a DNA damage response, there is no universal biomarker for these cells, regardless of inducer or cell type. Recent studies have analyzed the transcriptomic characteristics of these cells, leading to the identification of signature gene sets like CellAge, SeneQuest, and SenMayo. Advancements in single-cell and spatial RNA sequencing now allow for analyzing senescent cell heterogeneity within the same tissue and the development of machine learning algorithms, e.g., SenPred, SenSig, and SenCID, to discover cellular senescence using RNA sequencing data. Such insights not only deepen our understanding of the genetic pathways driving cellular senescence, but also promote the development of its quantifiable biomarkers. This review summarizes the current knowledge of transcriptomic signatures of cellular senescence and their potential as <em>in vivo</em> biomarkers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ageing Research Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ageing Research Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163724002216\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163724002216","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Developing transcriptomic signatures as a biomarker of cellular senescence
Cellular senescence is a cell fate driven by different types of stress, where damaged cells exit from the cell cycle and, in many cases, develop an inflammatory senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Senescence has often been linked to driving aging and the onset of multiple diseases conferred by the harmful SASP, which disrupts tissue homeostasis and impairs the regular function of many tissues. This phenomenon was first observed in vitro when fibroblasts halted replication after approximately 50 population doublings. In addition to replication-induced senescence, factors such as DNA damage and oncogene activation can induce cellular senescence both in culture and in vivo. Despite their contribution to aging and disease, identifying senescent cells in vivo has been challenging due to their heterogeneity. Although senescent cells can express the cell cycle inhibitors p16Ink4a and/or p21Cip1 and exhibit SA-ß-gal activity and evidence of a DNA damage response, there is no universal biomarker for these cells, regardless of inducer or cell type. Recent studies have analyzed the transcriptomic characteristics of these cells, leading to the identification of signature gene sets like CellAge, SeneQuest, and SenMayo. Advancements in single-cell and spatial RNA sequencing now allow for analyzing senescent cell heterogeneity within the same tissue and the development of machine learning algorithms, e.g., SenPred, SenSig, and SenCID, to discover cellular senescence using RNA sequencing data. Such insights not only deepen our understanding of the genetic pathways driving cellular senescence, but also promote the development of its quantifiable biomarkers. This review summarizes the current knowledge of transcriptomic signatures of cellular senescence and their potential as in vivo biomarkers.
期刊介绍:
With the rise in average human life expectancy, the impact of ageing and age-related diseases on our society has become increasingly significant. Ageing research is now a focal point for numerous laboratories, encompassing leaders in genetics, molecular and cellular biology, biochemistry, and behavior. Ageing Research Reviews (ARR) serves as a cornerstone in this field, addressing emerging trends.
ARR aims to fill a substantial gap by providing critical reviews and viewpoints on evolving discoveries concerning the mechanisms of ageing and age-related diseases. The rapid progress in understanding the mechanisms controlling cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival is unveiling new insights into the regulation of ageing. From telomerase to stem cells, and from energy to oxyradical metabolism, we are witnessing an exciting era in the multidisciplinary field of ageing research.
The journal explores the cellular and molecular foundations of interventions that extend lifespan, such as caloric restriction. It identifies the underpinnings of manipulations that extend lifespan, shedding light on novel approaches for preventing age-related diseases. ARR publishes articles on focused topics selected from the expansive field of ageing research, with a particular emphasis on the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the aging process. This includes age-related diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and neurodegenerative disorders. The journal also covers applications of basic ageing research to lifespan extension and disease prevention, offering a comprehensive platform for advancing our understanding of this critical field.