360 度反馈对组织内创新行为的影响:组织公正的中介作用

Karen Souki, Samar Samir Aad, Silva Karkoulian
{"title":"360 度反馈对组织内创新行为的影响:组织公正的中介作用","authors":"Karen Souki, Samar Samir Aad, Silva Karkoulian","doi":"10.1108/ijoa-12-2023-4146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to examine organizational justice, innovation and 360-degree feedback appraisals. It examines how 360-degree feedback appraisals affect innovative behavior, execution and creative asset use. This paper examines organizational justice (distributive, procedural and interactional) and employee perceptions of 360-degree feedback systems. Finally, this study investigates how procedural and interactional justice mediate the relationship between innovative behavior and 360-degree feedback appraisals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A sample of 200 participants from diverse locations, including Lebanon, Europe, the GCC, North Africa and Australia, spanning various occupations and industries were asked to complete the survey. This sample targeted participants who would be interested in the topic and who were selected from a diverse demographic characteristic. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software was used to analyze the research data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This study reveals important connections within organizations. It shows a positive link between using 360-degree feedback appraisals and innovation, including idea generation and implementation. In addition, it confirms that using such feedback is linked to employees' perceptions of fairness. Moreover, it finds a positive connection between innovation and fairness. Finally, it highlights organizational fairness as a key mediator between 360-degree feedback and innovation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The recent investigations conducted exhibit various limitations that open avenues for prospective research. Initially, a cross-sectional design was used, presenting an opportunity for future research to consider adopting a longitudinal approach. This method could facilitate the collection and analysis of data over time, allowing for a more nuanced exploration of causality. Moreover, this research concentrated solely on a singular component of performance appraisal, namely, 360-degree feedback. To enrich future investigations, researchers are encouraged to encompass other facets of performance appraisal, such as gauging satisfaction with and the efficacy of performance appraisal. Furthermore, potential future studies may delve into exploring the mediating impact of other variables in the relationship between 360-degree feedback and innovative behavior, such as job satisfaction and affective commitment. In addition, the potential role of various moderating variables, including organizational culture, perceived organizational support and structural empowerment, could be investigated in forthcoming studies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The study's findings carry practical implications for various stakeholders, encompassing employees, managers and policymakers. Managers aiming to foster an innovative culture should meticulously craft a 360-degree evaluation system that recognizes and incentivizes both concrete and intangible manifestations of innovation. The examination conducted in this research suggests a robust correlation between the existence of a 360-degree evaluation and behaviors related to ideation, encompassing idea generation and implementation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>To cultivate innovative behavior among employees, managers should empower their workforce, and one effective approach is to enhance employees' perceptions of the quality of performance appraisals. Recognizing employee innovative behavior emerges as a crucial prerequisite for the growth, development and sustainability of organizations, demanding specific attention from both managers and policymakers. In the organizational context, the relationship between innovative behavior and perceptions of organizational justice shows that organizations should aim at fostering an atmosphere that promotes creativity while also ensuring fair treatment and recognition for contributors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Despite the array of research on the relationship between innovative behavior and 360-degree feedback, this study is the first to examine the mediating effect of organizational justice on the relationship between 360-degree feedback and innovative behavior.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organizational Analysis","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of 360-degree feedback on innovative behavior within the organization: the mediating role of organizational justice\",\"authors\":\"Karen Souki, Samar Samir Aad, Silva Karkoulian\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijoa-12-2023-4146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to examine organizational justice, innovation and 360-degree feedback appraisals. It examines how 360-degree feedback appraisals affect innovative behavior, execution and creative asset use. This paper examines organizational justice (distributive, procedural and interactional) and employee perceptions of 360-degree feedback systems. Finally, this study investigates how procedural and interactional justice mediate the relationship between innovative behavior and 360-degree feedback appraisals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>A sample of 200 participants from diverse locations, including Lebanon, Europe, the GCC, North Africa and Australia, spanning various occupations and industries were asked to complete the survey. This sample targeted participants who would be interested in the topic and who were selected from a diverse demographic characteristic. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software was used to analyze the research data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>This study reveals important connections within organizations. It shows a positive link between using 360-degree feedback appraisals and innovation, including idea generation and implementation. In addition, it confirms that using such feedback is linked to employees' perceptions of fairness. Moreover, it finds a positive connection between innovation and fairness. Finally, it highlights organizational fairness as a key mediator between 360-degree feedback and innovation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The recent investigations conducted exhibit various limitations that open avenues for prospective research. Initially, a cross-sectional design was used, presenting an opportunity for future research to consider adopting a longitudinal approach. This method could facilitate the collection and analysis of data over time, allowing for a more nuanced exploration of causality. Moreover, this research concentrated solely on a singular component of performance appraisal, namely, 360-degree feedback. To enrich future investigations, researchers are encouraged to encompass other facets of performance appraisal, such as gauging satisfaction with and the efficacy of performance appraisal. Furthermore, potential future studies may delve into exploring the mediating impact of other variables in the relationship between 360-degree feedback and innovative behavior, such as job satisfaction and affective commitment. In addition, the potential role of various moderating variables, including organizational culture, perceived organizational support and structural empowerment, could be investigated in forthcoming studies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The study's findings carry practical implications for various stakeholders, encompassing employees, managers and policymakers. Managers aiming to foster an innovative culture should meticulously craft a 360-degree evaluation system that recognizes and incentivizes both concrete and intangible manifestations of innovation. The examination conducted in this research suggests a robust correlation between the existence of a 360-degree evaluation and behaviors related to ideation, encompassing idea generation and implementation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\\n<p>To cultivate innovative behavior among employees, managers should empower their workforce, and one effective approach is to enhance employees' perceptions of the quality of performance appraisals. Recognizing employee innovative behavior emerges as a crucial prerequisite for the growth, development and sustainability of organizations, demanding specific attention from both managers and policymakers. In the organizational context, the relationship between innovative behavior and perceptions of organizational justice shows that organizations should aim at fostering an atmosphere that promotes creativity while also ensuring fair treatment and recognition for contributors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Despite the array of research on the relationship between innovative behavior and 360-degree feedback, this study is the first to examine the mediating effect of organizational justice on the relationship between 360-degree feedback and innovative behavior.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Organizational Analysis\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Organizational Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-12-2023-4146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organizational Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-12-2023-4146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在探讨组织公正、创新和 360 度反馈评估。它探讨了 360 度反馈评价如何影响创新行为、执行力和创造性资产的使用。本文探讨了组织公正(分配公正、程序公正和互动公正)和员工对 360 度反馈系统的看法。最后,本研究还探讨了程序公正和互动公正是如何调节创新行为与 360 度反馈评估之间的关系的。设计/方法/途径来自黎巴嫩、欧洲、海湾合作委员会、北非和澳大利亚等不同地区、不同职业和行业的 200 名参与者被要求完成调查。该样本针对的是对该主题感兴趣的参与者,他们是从不同的人口特征中挑选出来的。这项研究揭示了组织内部的重要联系。研究表明,使用 360 度反馈评估与创新(包括想法的产生和实施)之间存在积极联系。此外,研究还证实,使用此类反馈与员工的公平感有关。此外,研究还发现创新与公平性之间存在正向联系。最后,它强调了组织公平性是 360 度反馈与创新之间的关键中介因素。研究局限性/启示最近进行的调查显示了各种局限性,为今后的研究开辟了道路。最初采用的是横断面设计,这为今后的研究提供了考虑采用纵向方法的机会。这种方法有助于收集和分析长期数据,从而对因果关系进行更细致的探讨。此外,这项研究只集中于绩效评估的一个单一组成部分,即 360 度反馈。为了丰富今后的研究,我们鼓励研究人员将绩效考核的其他方面也纳入研究范围,如衡量绩效考核的满意度和功效。此外,未来的潜在研究还可以深入探讨其他变量(如工作满意度和情感承诺)对 360 度反馈与创新行为之间关系的中介影响。此外,还可以在今后的研究中探讨各种调节变量的潜在作用,包括组织文化、感知到的组织支持和结构授权。旨在培养创新文化的管理者应精心设计 360 度评价体系,承认并激励创新的具体和无形表现。社会影响为了培养员工的创新行为,管理者应增强员工的能力,其中一个有效的方法就是提高员工对绩效考核质量的认识。承认员工的创新行为是组织成长、发展和可持续发展的重要前提,需要管理者和政策制定者给予特别关注。在组织环境中,创新行为与组织公正感之间的关系表明,组织应致力于营造一种促进创造力的氛围,同时确保贡献者得到公平的待遇和认可。原创性/价值尽管关于创新行为与 360 度反馈之间关系的研究很多,但本研究首次考察了组织公正对 360 度反馈与创新行为之间关系的中介效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of 360-degree feedback on innovative behavior within the organization: the mediating role of organizational justice

Purpose

This study aims to examine organizational justice, innovation and 360-degree feedback appraisals. It examines how 360-degree feedback appraisals affect innovative behavior, execution and creative asset use. This paper examines organizational justice (distributive, procedural and interactional) and employee perceptions of 360-degree feedback systems. Finally, this study investigates how procedural and interactional justice mediate the relationship between innovative behavior and 360-degree feedback appraisals.

Design/methodology/approach

A sample of 200 participants from diverse locations, including Lebanon, Europe, the GCC, North Africa and Australia, spanning various occupations and industries were asked to complete the survey. This sample targeted participants who would be interested in the topic and who were selected from a diverse demographic characteristic. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software was used to analyze the research data.

Findings

This study reveals important connections within organizations. It shows a positive link between using 360-degree feedback appraisals and innovation, including idea generation and implementation. In addition, it confirms that using such feedback is linked to employees' perceptions of fairness. Moreover, it finds a positive connection between innovation and fairness. Finally, it highlights organizational fairness as a key mediator between 360-degree feedback and innovation.

Research limitations/implications

The recent investigations conducted exhibit various limitations that open avenues for prospective research. Initially, a cross-sectional design was used, presenting an opportunity for future research to consider adopting a longitudinal approach. This method could facilitate the collection and analysis of data over time, allowing for a more nuanced exploration of causality. Moreover, this research concentrated solely on a singular component of performance appraisal, namely, 360-degree feedback. To enrich future investigations, researchers are encouraged to encompass other facets of performance appraisal, such as gauging satisfaction with and the efficacy of performance appraisal. Furthermore, potential future studies may delve into exploring the mediating impact of other variables in the relationship between 360-degree feedback and innovative behavior, such as job satisfaction and affective commitment. In addition, the potential role of various moderating variables, including organizational culture, perceived organizational support and structural empowerment, could be investigated in forthcoming studies.

Practical implications

The study's findings carry practical implications for various stakeholders, encompassing employees, managers and policymakers. Managers aiming to foster an innovative culture should meticulously craft a 360-degree evaluation system that recognizes and incentivizes both concrete and intangible manifestations of innovation. The examination conducted in this research suggests a robust correlation between the existence of a 360-degree evaluation and behaviors related to ideation, encompassing idea generation and implementation.

Social implications

To cultivate innovative behavior among employees, managers should empower their workforce, and one effective approach is to enhance employees' perceptions of the quality of performance appraisals. Recognizing employee innovative behavior emerges as a crucial prerequisite for the growth, development and sustainability of organizations, demanding specific attention from both managers and policymakers. In the organizational context, the relationship between innovative behavior and perceptions of organizational justice shows that organizations should aim at fostering an atmosphere that promotes creativity while also ensuring fair treatment and recognition for contributors.

Originality/value

Despite the array of research on the relationship between innovative behavior and 360-degree feedback, this study is the first to examine the mediating effect of organizational justice on the relationship between 360-degree feedback and innovative behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The IJOA welcomes papers that draw on, but not exclusively: ■Organization theory ■Organization behaviour ■Organization development ■Organizational learning ■Strategic and change management ■People in organizational contexts including human resource management and human resource development ■Business and its interrelationship with society ■Ethics and morals, spirituality
期刊最新文献
Antecedents of effectuation and causation in SMEs from emerging markets: the role of CEO temporal focus Does spirituality at work promote work-to-family enrichment among Indian female employees? Unlocking work engagement: harnessing social capital, proactive personalities and POS in newcomers’ organizational socialization The university as an intellectual capital catalyst for sustainable organisations: conceptualising the nexus Green leadership and innovation: catalysts for environmental performance in Italian manufacturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1