急诊科胸痛患者急性冠状动脉综合征的护理点心脏超声诊断准确性:一项单中心前瞻性研究。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001161
Paolo Bima, Ilya Agishev, Ilaria Fucile, Giuliano de Stefano, Fulvio Morello, Christian Mueller, Peiman Nazerian
{"title":"急诊科胸痛患者急性冠状动脉综合征的护理点心脏超声诊断准确性:一项单中心前瞻性研究。","authors":"Paolo Bima, Ilya Agishev, Ilaria Fucile, Giuliano de Stefano, Fulvio Morello, Christian Mueller, Peiman Nazerian","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) performed in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain is currently unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of regional wall motion abnormalities detected with FoCUS for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A Single-center prospective observational study conducted in 2022 in the ED of the University Hospital Careggi, Italy.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Adult patients presenting to the ED with acute nontraumatic chest pain were enrolled, irrespective of the presence of previous regional wall motion abnormalities. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions and patients with hemodynamic instability were excluded. FoCUS was performed at presentation by a trained ED physician.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>The final diagnosis of NSTE-ACS vs. alternative diagnosis was adjudicated by an ED physician blinded to FoCUS results after a 30-day follow-up. To assess if regional wall motion abnormalities were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS, a multivariable logistic regression model was built. Diagnostic performance measures were calculated. A sensitivity analysis considering only type-1 NSTEMIs (i.e. plaque rupture/thrombosis) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Among 686 patients, NSTE-ACS was adjudicated in 106 (15.5%) patients, 67 of which were NSTEMIs. A total of 87 (12.7%) patients had regional wall motion abnormalities detected by FoCUS, which were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Regional wall motion abnormalities had a sensitivity of 42.5% (33.0-51.9), a specificity of 92.8% (90.6-94.9), a negative predictive value of 89.8% (87.4-92.2), and a positive predictive value of 51.7% (41.2-62.2), for NSTE-ACS. Results were consistent in the sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In ED patients with chest pain and no ST elevation, the detection of regional wall motion abnormalities was a predictor of NSTE-ACS. Despite a high specificity, which indicated a possible role of FoCUS in the rule-in of NSTE-ACS, sensitivity was too low to allow a safe rule-out using FoCUS results alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care cardiac ultrasound for acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department: a single-center prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Bima, Ilya Agishev, Ilaria Fucile, Giuliano de Stefano, Fulvio Morello, Christian Mueller, Peiman Nazerian\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) performed in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain is currently unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of regional wall motion abnormalities detected with FoCUS for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A Single-center prospective observational study conducted in 2022 in the ED of the University Hospital Careggi, Italy.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Adult patients presenting to the ED with acute nontraumatic chest pain were enrolled, irrespective of the presence of previous regional wall motion abnormalities. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions and patients with hemodynamic instability were excluded. FoCUS was performed at presentation by a trained ED physician.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>The final diagnosis of NSTE-ACS vs. alternative diagnosis was adjudicated by an ED physician blinded to FoCUS results after a 30-day follow-up. To assess if regional wall motion abnormalities were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS, a multivariable logistic regression model was built. Diagnostic performance measures were calculated. A sensitivity analysis considering only type-1 NSTEMIs (i.e. plaque rupture/thrombosis) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Among 686 patients, NSTE-ACS was adjudicated in 106 (15.5%) patients, 67 of which were NSTEMIs. A total of 87 (12.7%) patients had regional wall motion abnormalities detected by FoCUS, which were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Regional wall motion abnormalities had a sensitivity of 42.5% (33.0-51.9), a specificity of 92.8% (90.6-94.9), a negative predictive value of 89.8% (87.4-92.2), and a positive predictive value of 51.7% (41.2-62.2), for NSTE-ACS. Results were consistent in the sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In ED patients with chest pain and no ST elevation, the detection of regional wall motion abnormalities was a predictor of NSTE-ACS. Despite a high specificity, which indicated a possible role of FoCUS in the rule-in of NSTE-ACS, sensitivity was too low to allow a safe rule-out using FoCUS results alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和重要性:目前尚不清楚对因胸痛到急诊科(ED)就诊的患者进行聚焦心脏超声(FoCUS)诊断的准确性:本研究旨在评估在诊断非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)时通过 FoCUS 检测到的区域室壁运动异常的诊断准确性:2022年在意大利卡雷吉大学医院急诊室开展的单中心前瞻性观察研究:因急性非外伤性胸痛前往急诊室就诊的成人患者,无论之前是否出现过区域性室壁运动异常,均被纳入研究范围。ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者和血流动力学不稳定患者除外。FoCUS由经过培训的急诊科医生在患者就诊时进行:由一名对 FoCUS 结果保密的急诊科医生在 30 天随访后做出 NSTE-ACS 与其他诊断的最终诊断。为评估区域室壁运动异常是否是 NSTE-ACS 的独立预测因素,建立了一个多变量逻辑回归模型。计算了诊断性能指标。仅考虑了1型NSTEMI(即斑块破裂/血栓形成)的敏感性分析:在 686 例患者中,106 例(15.5%)患者被判定为 NSTE-ACS,其中 67 例为 NSTEMI。共有 87 例(12.7%)患者通过 FoCUS 检测到区域室壁运动异常,在多变量逻辑回归分析中,这些异常是 NSTE-ACS 的独立预测因素。区域室壁运动异常对 NSTE-ACS 的敏感性为 42.5%(33.0-51.9),特异性为 92.8%(90.6-94.9),阴性预测值为 89.8%(87.4-92.2),阳性预测值为 51.7%(41.2-62.2)。敏感性分析的结果一致:结论:在胸痛且无 ST 波抬高的急诊患者中,区域室壁运动异常是 NSTE-ACS 的预测指标。尽管特异性很高,这表明 FoCUS 在排除 NSTE-ACS 方面可能发挥作用,但灵敏度太低,无法仅凭 FoCUS 结果就安全地排除 NSTE-ACS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care cardiac ultrasound for acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department: a single-center prospective study.

Background and importance: The diagnostic accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) performed in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain is currently unknown.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of regional wall motion abnormalities detected with FoCUS for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) diagnosis.

Design: A Single-center prospective observational study conducted in 2022 in the ED of the University Hospital Careggi, Italy.

Setting and participants: Adult patients presenting to the ED with acute nontraumatic chest pain were enrolled, irrespective of the presence of previous regional wall motion abnormalities. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions and patients with hemodynamic instability were excluded. FoCUS was performed at presentation by a trained ED physician.

Outcome measures and analysis: The final diagnosis of NSTE-ACS vs. alternative diagnosis was adjudicated by an ED physician blinded to FoCUS results after a 30-day follow-up. To assess if regional wall motion abnormalities were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS, a multivariable logistic regression model was built. Diagnostic performance measures were calculated. A sensitivity analysis considering only type-1 NSTEMIs (i.e. plaque rupture/thrombosis) was conducted.

Main results: Among 686 patients, NSTE-ACS was adjudicated in 106 (15.5%) patients, 67 of which were NSTEMIs. A total of 87 (12.7%) patients had regional wall motion abnormalities detected by FoCUS, which were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Regional wall motion abnormalities had a sensitivity of 42.5% (33.0-51.9), a specificity of 92.8% (90.6-94.9), a negative predictive value of 89.8% (87.4-92.2), and a positive predictive value of 51.7% (41.2-62.2), for NSTE-ACS. Results were consistent in the sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions: In ED patients with chest pain and no ST elevation, the detection of regional wall motion abnormalities was a predictor of NSTE-ACS. Despite a high specificity, which indicated a possible role of FoCUS in the rule-in of NSTE-ACS, sensitivity was too low to allow a safe rule-out using FoCUS results alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field. Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
期刊最新文献
Procedural sedation in the emergency department by Italian emergency physicians: results of the SEED SIMEU registry. Association between time to antibiotic and mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the Emergency Department: post hoc analysis of the 1-BED randomized clinical trial. Association between lactate determined at emergency department arrival and the probability of inhospital mortality and intensive care admission in elderly patients. A decade of European Board Examination in Emergency Medicine: achievements and future perspectives. Contribution of point-of-care ultrasound in the prehospital management of patients with non-trauma acute dyspnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1