Paolo Bima, Ilya Agishev, Ilaria Fucile, Giuliano de Stefano, Fulvio Morello, Christian Mueller, Peiman Nazerian
{"title":"急诊科胸痛患者急性冠状动脉综合征的护理点心脏超声诊断准确性:一项单中心前瞻性研究。","authors":"Paolo Bima, Ilya Agishev, Ilaria Fucile, Giuliano de Stefano, Fulvio Morello, Christian Mueller, Peiman Nazerian","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) performed in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain is currently unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of regional wall motion abnormalities detected with FoCUS for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A Single-center prospective observational study conducted in 2022 in the ED of the University Hospital Careggi, Italy.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Adult patients presenting to the ED with acute nontraumatic chest pain were enrolled, irrespective of the presence of previous regional wall motion abnormalities. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions and patients with hemodynamic instability were excluded. FoCUS was performed at presentation by a trained ED physician.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>The final diagnosis of NSTE-ACS vs. alternative diagnosis was adjudicated by an ED physician blinded to FoCUS results after a 30-day follow-up. To assess if regional wall motion abnormalities were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS, a multivariable logistic regression model was built. Diagnostic performance measures were calculated. A sensitivity analysis considering only type-1 NSTEMIs (i.e. plaque rupture/thrombosis) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Among 686 patients, NSTE-ACS was adjudicated in 106 (15.5%) patients, 67 of which were NSTEMIs. A total of 87 (12.7%) patients had regional wall motion abnormalities detected by FoCUS, which were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Regional wall motion abnormalities had a sensitivity of 42.5% (33.0-51.9), a specificity of 92.8% (90.6-94.9), a negative predictive value of 89.8% (87.4-92.2), and a positive predictive value of 51.7% (41.2-62.2), for NSTE-ACS. Results were consistent in the sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In ED patients with chest pain and no ST elevation, the detection of regional wall motion abnormalities was a predictor of NSTE-ACS. Despite a high specificity, which indicated a possible role of FoCUS in the rule-in of NSTE-ACS, sensitivity was too low to allow a safe rule-out using FoCUS results alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care cardiac ultrasound for acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department: a single-center prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Bima, Ilya Agishev, Ilaria Fucile, Giuliano de Stefano, Fulvio Morello, Christian Mueller, Peiman Nazerian\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) performed in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain is currently unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of regional wall motion abnormalities detected with FoCUS for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A Single-center prospective observational study conducted in 2022 in the ED of the University Hospital Careggi, Italy.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Adult patients presenting to the ED with acute nontraumatic chest pain were enrolled, irrespective of the presence of previous regional wall motion abnormalities. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions and patients with hemodynamic instability were excluded. FoCUS was performed at presentation by a trained ED physician.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>The final diagnosis of NSTE-ACS vs. alternative diagnosis was adjudicated by an ED physician blinded to FoCUS results after a 30-day follow-up. To assess if regional wall motion abnormalities were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS, a multivariable logistic regression model was built. Diagnostic performance measures were calculated. A sensitivity analysis considering only type-1 NSTEMIs (i.e. plaque rupture/thrombosis) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Among 686 patients, NSTE-ACS was adjudicated in 106 (15.5%) patients, 67 of which were NSTEMIs. A total of 87 (12.7%) patients had regional wall motion abnormalities detected by FoCUS, which were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Regional wall motion abnormalities had a sensitivity of 42.5% (33.0-51.9), a specificity of 92.8% (90.6-94.9), a negative predictive value of 89.8% (87.4-92.2), and a positive predictive value of 51.7% (41.2-62.2), for NSTE-ACS. Results were consistent in the sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In ED patients with chest pain and no ST elevation, the detection of regional wall motion abnormalities was a predictor of NSTE-ACS. Despite a high specificity, which indicated a possible role of FoCUS in the rule-in of NSTE-ACS, sensitivity was too low to allow a safe rule-out using FoCUS results alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care cardiac ultrasound for acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department: a single-center prospective study.
Background and importance: The diagnostic accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) performed in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain is currently unknown.
Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of regional wall motion abnormalities detected with FoCUS for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) diagnosis.
Design: A Single-center prospective observational study conducted in 2022 in the ED of the University Hospital Careggi, Italy.
Setting and participants: Adult patients presenting to the ED with acute nontraumatic chest pain were enrolled, irrespective of the presence of previous regional wall motion abnormalities. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions and patients with hemodynamic instability were excluded. FoCUS was performed at presentation by a trained ED physician.
Outcome measures and analysis: The final diagnosis of NSTE-ACS vs. alternative diagnosis was adjudicated by an ED physician blinded to FoCUS results after a 30-day follow-up. To assess if regional wall motion abnormalities were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS, a multivariable logistic regression model was built. Diagnostic performance measures were calculated. A sensitivity analysis considering only type-1 NSTEMIs (i.e. plaque rupture/thrombosis) was conducted.
Main results: Among 686 patients, NSTE-ACS was adjudicated in 106 (15.5%) patients, 67 of which were NSTEMIs. A total of 87 (12.7%) patients had regional wall motion abnormalities detected by FoCUS, which were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Regional wall motion abnormalities had a sensitivity of 42.5% (33.0-51.9), a specificity of 92.8% (90.6-94.9), a negative predictive value of 89.8% (87.4-92.2), and a positive predictive value of 51.7% (41.2-62.2), for NSTE-ACS. Results were consistent in the sensitivity analysis.
Conclusions: In ED patients with chest pain and no ST elevation, the detection of regional wall motion abnormalities was a predictor of NSTE-ACS. Despite a high specificity, which indicated a possible role of FoCUS in the rule-in of NSTE-ACS, sensitivity was too low to allow a safe rule-out using FoCUS results alone.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field.
Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community.
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.