{"title":"\"你想让我成为什么样的人,我就是什么样的人。我就是今天的主角\":关于混血儿饮食倾向和行为的混合方法研究","authors":"Mark Cleveland , Chenzi Feng Zhao , Sam Ghebrai","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is a dearth of research on how food serves a tool for the formation and enaction of the social identities of mixed-race people, how these social identities shape the unique food dispositions and behaviors of mixed-race individuals, and how, by virtue of their liminal status, mixed-race consumers are apt to blend and adapt food behaviors from their dual heritages, and subsequently diffuse these adaptations into the broader population. This mixed methods study, entailing semi-structured interviews with mixed-race individuals, followed by an international survey involving 645 mixed-race consumers living in Canada, the USA, and the UK, aims to address these knowledge gaps. Induced from the qualitative data, we disclose four overarching themes regarding the food practices and perceptions, in relation to our mixed-race informants’ identity and their position astride two cultures: (1) ‘you are what you eat’ (food as instrumental for ethnic identity), (2) ‘mixing the best of both worlds’ (integration and transmutation), (3) situational authenticity and awareness of cultural appropriation, and (4) double marginalization, denigration, and self-valorization. The quantitative findings revealed that blending cultural customs, blending food practices, and using products to express mixed-race identity, were all a positive function of the racialized-minority parent’s ethnic maintenance, as well as both independent and interdependent self-construals—demonstrating that racial and cultural blending promulgates these behaviors. Theoretical and practical implications and directions for future research are elucidated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 105259"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001617/pdfft?md5=f7e96940f96271aab6602ecff5b68231&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324001617-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“I’m like, whatever you want me to be. I’m the flavor of the day”: A mixed-methods study of the food dispositions and behaviors of mixed-race individuals\",\"authors\":\"Mark Cleveland , Chenzi Feng Zhao , Sam Ghebrai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is a dearth of research on how food serves a tool for the formation and enaction of the social identities of mixed-race people, how these social identities shape the unique food dispositions and behaviors of mixed-race individuals, and how, by virtue of their liminal status, mixed-race consumers are apt to blend and adapt food behaviors from their dual heritages, and subsequently diffuse these adaptations into the broader population. This mixed methods study, entailing semi-structured interviews with mixed-race individuals, followed by an international survey involving 645 mixed-race consumers living in Canada, the USA, and the UK, aims to address these knowledge gaps. Induced from the qualitative data, we disclose four overarching themes regarding the food practices and perceptions, in relation to our mixed-race informants’ identity and their position astride two cultures: (1) ‘you are what you eat’ (food as instrumental for ethnic identity), (2) ‘mixing the best of both worlds’ (integration and transmutation), (3) situational authenticity and awareness of cultural appropriation, and (4) double marginalization, denigration, and self-valorization. The quantitative findings revealed that blending cultural customs, blending food practices, and using products to express mixed-race identity, were all a positive function of the racialized-minority parent’s ethnic maintenance, as well as both independent and interdependent self-construals—demonstrating that racial and cultural blending promulgates these behaviors. Theoretical and practical implications and directions for future research are elucidated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":\"121 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001617/pdfft?md5=f7e96940f96271aab6602ecff5b68231&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324001617-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001617\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001617","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
“I’m like, whatever you want me to be. I’m the flavor of the day”: A mixed-methods study of the food dispositions and behaviors of mixed-race individuals
There is a dearth of research on how food serves a tool for the formation and enaction of the social identities of mixed-race people, how these social identities shape the unique food dispositions and behaviors of mixed-race individuals, and how, by virtue of their liminal status, mixed-race consumers are apt to blend and adapt food behaviors from their dual heritages, and subsequently diffuse these adaptations into the broader population. This mixed methods study, entailing semi-structured interviews with mixed-race individuals, followed by an international survey involving 645 mixed-race consumers living in Canada, the USA, and the UK, aims to address these knowledge gaps. Induced from the qualitative data, we disclose four overarching themes regarding the food practices and perceptions, in relation to our mixed-race informants’ identity and their position astride two cultures: (1) ‘you are what you eat’ (food as instrumental for ethnic identity), (2) ‘mixing the best of both worlds’ (integration and transmutation), (3) situational authenticity and awareness of cultural appropriation, and (4) double marginalization, denigration, and self-valorization. The quantitative findings revealed that blending cultural customs, blending food practices, and using products to express mixed-race identity, were all a positive function of the racialized-minority parent’s ethnic maintenance, as well as both independent and interdependent self-construals—demonstrating that racial and cultural blending promulgates these behaviors. Theoretical and practical implications and directions for future research are elucidated.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.