电子商务组织的度量和指标绩效衡量系统:对其实用性的共识分析

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Electronic Commerce Research and Applications Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101420
Kwee Keong Choong , Liz Bacon
{"title":"电子商务组织的度量和指标绩效衡量系统:对其实用性的共识分析","authors":"Kwee Keong Choong ,&nbsp;Liz Bacon","doi":"10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electronic commerce (EC) is becoming a popular platform for online retail shopping and online payment, and it has become a new phenomenon of business transactions and innovation. In view of EC importance in global business transactions, surprisingly, there is no proper and appropriate system of performance measurement. Even if an EC firm were to measure performance, typically, the focus is on financial results using the traditional accounting system (AS) of measurement. The aim of this paper is to identify the metrics and indicators needed for EC performance measurement as the AS is inappropriate for many of the EC activities such as traffic flow, reliability of security of online payments, use of social-media data, etc. We first use a systematic analysis of selected articles to help us identify, understand and select metrics and indicators that are applicable for EC performance measurement. The <em>Delphi method</em> is then undertaken to conduct a questionnaire survey to gauge consensus of experts’ opinions with respect to (wrt) the use of those metrics and indicators selected. We found the respondents largely agreed that the metrics and indicators proposed by us are necessary or very necessary for use in EC performance measurement, although the experts consider three of the metrics proposed − traffic sources, emails subscribers and customer lifetime value be replaced with three accounting indicators (net income, return on investment and break-even points). The data is robust as it is verified by statistical tests. This study has both academic and practical implications; for the former, the metrics and indicators proposed meet the theoretical mathematical measurement system, and for the latter, the metrics and indicators proposed allows operation and strategic managers to design and develop an organization’s PMS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50541,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 101420"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A metric and indicator performance measurement system for e-commerce organizations: A consensus analysis of their usefulness\",\"authors\":\"Kwee Keong Choong ,&nbsp;Liz Bacon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Electronic commerce (EC) is becoming a popular platform for online retail shopping and online payment, and it has become a new phenomenon of business transactions and innovation. In view of EC importance in global business transactions, surprisingly, there is no proper and appropriate system of performance measurement. Even if an EC firm were to measure performance, typically, the focus is on financial results using the traditional accounting system (AS) of measurement. The aim of this paper is to identify the metrics and indicators needed for EC performance measurement as the AS is inappropriate for many of the EC activities such as traffic flow, reliability of security of online payments, use of social-media data, etc. We first use a systematic analysis of selected articles to help us identify, understand and select metrics and indicators that are applicable for EC performance measurement. The <em>Delphi method</em> is then undertaken to conduct a questionnaire survey to gauge consensus of experts’ opinions with respect to (wrt) the use of those metrics and indicators selected. We found the respondents largely agreed that the metrics and indicators proposed by us are necessary or very necessary for use in EC performance measurement, although the experts consider three of the metrics proposed − traffic sources, emails subscribers and customer lifetime value be replaced with three accounting indicators (net income, return on investment and break-even points). The data is robust as it is verified by statistical tests. This study has both academic and practical implications; for the former, the metrics and indicators proposed meet the theoretical mathematical measurement system, and for the latter, the metrics and indicators proposed allows operation and strategic managers to design and develop an organization’s PMS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422324000656\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422324000656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子商务(EC)正在成为网上零售购物和网上支付的流行平台,并已成为商业交易和创新的新现象。鉴于电子商务在全球商业交易中的重要性,令人惊讶的是,目前还没有一个适当的、合适的绩效衡量系统。即使电子商务公司要衡量绩效,通常也是采用传统的会计制度(AS)来衡量财务结果。本文的目的是确定电子商业绩效衡量所需的度量和指标,因为传统会计制度不适合电子商业的许多活动,如流量、在线支付的安全可靠性、社交媒体数据的使用等。我们首先对所选文章进行系统分析,以帮助我们识别、理解和选择适用于欧共体绩效衡量的度量和指标。然后,我们采用德尔菲法进行问卷调查,以了解专家们对所选衡量标准和指标使用情况的一致意见。我们发现,受访者基本同意,我们提出的度量和指标对于用于衡量企业绩效是必要或非常必要的,不过专家们认为,建议中的三个度量--流量来源、电子邮件订户和客户终身价值--应由三个会计指标(净收入、投资回报和盈亏平衡点)取代。数据是可靠的,因为它经过了统计检验。这项研究既有学术意义,也有现实意义;对于前者,所提出的衡量标准和指标符合数学衡量系统的理论;对于后者,所提出的衡量标准和指标使运营和战略管理者能够设计和开发组织的 PMS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A metric and indicator performance measurement system for e-commerce organizations: A consensus analysis of their usefulness

Electronic commerce (EC) is becoming a popular platform for online retail shopping and online payment, and it has become a new phenomenon of business transactions and innovation. In view of EC importance in global business transactions, surprisingly, there is no proper and appropriate system of performance measurement. Even if an EC firm were to measure performance, typically, the focus is on financial results using the traditional accounting system (AS) of measurement. The aim of this paper is to identify the metrics and indicators needed for EC performance measurement as the AS is inappropriate for many of the EC activities such as traffic flow, reliability of security of online payments, use of social-media data, etc. We first use a systematic analysis of selected articles to help us identify, understand and select metrics and indicators that are applicable for EC performance measurement. The Delphi method is then undertaken to conduct a questionnaire survey to gauge consensus of experts’ opinions with respect to (wrt) the use of those metrics and indicators selected. We found the respondents largely agreed that the metrics and indicators proposed by us are necessary or very necessary for use in EC performance measurement, although the experts consider three of the metrics proposed − traffic sources, emails subscribers and customer lifetime value be replaced with three accounting indicators (net income, return on investment and break-even points). The data is robust as it is verified by statistical tests. This study has both academic and practical implications; for the former, the metrics and indicators proposed meet the theoretical mathematical measurement system, and for the latter, the metrics and indicators proposed allows operation and strategic managers to design and develop an organization’s PMS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications aims to create and disseminate enduring knowledge for the fast-changing e-commerce environment. A major dilemma in e-commerce research is how to achieve a balance between the currency and the life span of knowledge. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications will contribute to the establishment of a research community to create the knowledge, technology, theory, and applications for the development of electronic commerce. This is targeted at the intersection of technological potential and business aims.
期刊最新文献
Who should provide a trade-in service under the online agency-selling mode? Home is best: Review source and cross-border online shopping Sustaining superior visibility within digital platforms through inside and outside competitive action repertoires The effects of physician’s brand positioning on diagnostic dispensing continuity and cross-provincial healthcare flow: Evidence from an online traditional Chinese medicine community Physical stores versus physical showrooms: Channel structures of online retailers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1