利用综合步骤选择确定捕食风险对野牛栖息地选择和移动的影响

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecosphere Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.4909
S. Salganek, K. A. Schoenecker, M. L. N. Terwilliger
{"title":"利用综合步骤选择确定捕食风险对野牛栖息地选择和移动的影响","authors":"S. Salganek,&nbsp;K. A. Schoenecker,&nbsp;M. L. N. Terwilliger","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.4909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Animal movement is a fundamental mechanism that shapes communities and ecosystems. Ungulates alter the ecosystems they inhabit and understanding their movements and distribution is critical for linking habitat with population dynamics. Predation risk has been shown to strongly influence ungulate movement patterns, such that ungulates may select habitat where predation risk is lower (refugia), adjust movement rates, temporal patterns, or selection of cover variables in areas with greater predation risk. We evaluated potential predation avoidance behavior in a population of plains bison inhabiting the north rim of Grand Canyon National Park (GRCA) and adjacent Kaibab National Forest (KNF). The KNF has year-round hunting managed by Arizona Game and Fish Department, whereas hunting is not allowed in GRCA. Human-maintained water sources on the KNF are particularly important resources for bison wherein they may be exposed to higher predation risk to access these resources. We used 2-h GPS locations for three years from 31 bison (<i>n</i> = 9 males; <i>n</i> = 22 females), and integrative step selection analysis to test four hypotheses about the potential for bison to reduce their risk from human predation by avoiding areas of high predation risk; moving faster in areas with high predation risk; entering high-risk areas at night when risk is reduced; and entering high-risk areas in habitats that provide cover (coniferous forest). The highest performing model indicated bison movement was 1.3 times faster per 2-h step interval than in areas with no hunting across all vegetation classes (coniferous forest, shrub, quaking aspen, grass-forb meadow) and across all topography classes (valley, slope, ridge). Bison moved more slowly in grass-forb meadows than all other vegetation types, and in valleys relative to slopes and ridges. Several radio-collared individuals had no GPS locations in KNF for the duration of the study. Bison avoided predation risk using two strategies: moving faster while in the KNF, and fully avoiding high-risk areas by remaining within GRCA. Management that manipulates or reduces timing of hunting seasons may reduce perceived predation risk and encourage bison to distribute into the KNF and across a broader range of available habitat.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.4909","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using integrated step selection to determine effects of predation risk on bison habitat selection and movement\",\"authors\":\"S. Salganek,&nbsp;K. A. Schoenecker,&nbsp;M. L. N. Terwilliger\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.4909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Animal movement is a fundamental mechanism that shapes communities and ecosystems. Ungulates alter the ecosystems they inhabit and understanding their movements and distribution is critical for linking habitat with population dynamics. Predation risk has been shown to strongly influence ungulate movement patterns, such that ungulates may select habitat where predation risk is lower (refugia), adjust movement rates, temporal patterns, or selection of cover variables in areas with greater predation risk. We evaluated potential predation avoidance behavior in a population of plains bison inhabiting the north rim of Grand Canyon National Park (GRCA) and adjacent Kaibab National Forest (KNF). The KNF has year-round hunting managed by Arizona Game and Fish Department, whereas hunting is not allowed in GRCA. Human-maintained water sources on the KNF are particularly important resources for bison wherein they may be exposed to higher predation risk to access these resources. We used 2-h GPS locations for three years from 31 bison (<i>n</i> = 9 males; <i>n</i> = 22 females), and integrative step selection analysis to test four hypotheses about the potential for bison to reduce their risk from human predation by avoiding areas of high predation risk; moving faster in areas with high predation risk; entering high-risk areas at night when risk is reduced; and entering high-risk areas in habitats that provide cover (coniferous forest). The highest performing model indicated bison movement was 1.3 times faster per 2-h step interval than in areas with no hunting across all vegetation classes (coniferous forest, shrub, quaking aspen, grass-forb meadow) and across all topography classes (valley, slope, ridge). Bison moved more slowly in grass-forb meadows than all other vegetation types, and in valleys relative to slopes and ridges. Several radio-collared individuals had no GPS locations in KNF for the duration of the study. Bison avoided predation risk using two strategies: moving faster while in the KNF, and fully avoiding high-risk areas by remaining within GRCA. Management that manipulates or reduces timing of hunting seasons may reduce perceived predation risk and encourage bison to distribute into the KNF and across a broader range of available habitat.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.4909\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4909\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4909","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动物运动是塑造群落和生态系统的基本机制。有蹄类动物会改变它们栖息的生态系统,因此了解它们的运动和分布对于将栖息地与种群动态联系起来至关重要。捕食风险对有蹄类动物的运动模式有很大影响,有蹄类动物可能会选择捕食风险较低的栖息地(避风港),在捕食风险较高的地区调整运动速度、时间模式或选择覆盖变量。我们对栖息在大峡谷国家公园(Grand Canyon National Park,GRCA)北缘和邻近的凯巴布国家森林公园(Kaibab National Forest,KNF)的平原野牛的潜在捕食规避行为进行了评估。KNF 由亚利桑那州狩猎和渔业部管理,全年狩猎,而 GRCA 不允许狩猎。KNF 上由人类维护的水源对野牛来说是特别重要的资源,野牛为了获得这些资源可能会面临更高的捕食风险。我们利用 31 头野牛(n = 9 头雄性;n = 22 头雌性)三年的 2 小时 GPS 定位和综合步长选择分析,检验了野牛通过以下方式降低人类捕食风险的可能性的四个假设:避开捕食风险高的地区;在捕食风险高的地区移动得更快;在夜间风险降低时进入风险高的地区;在提供覆盖物(针叶林)的栖息地进入风险高的地区。表现最好的模型表明,在所有植被等级(针叶林、灌木、柞树、草-草甸)和所有地形等级(山谷、斜坡、山脊)中,野牛每 2 小时的移动间隔比没有狩猎的地区快 1.3 倍。野牛在禾本科草甸中的移动速度慢于其他所有植被类型,在山谷中的移动速度也慢于山坡和山脊。在研究期间,有几只被无线电追踪的野牛在KNF没有GPS定位。野牛使用两种策略规避捕食风险:在 KNF 内加快移动速度,以及留在 GRCA 内完全避开高风险区域。控制或减少狩猎季节时间的管理方法可能会降低捕食风险,并鼓励野牛分布到 KNF 和更广泛的可用栖息地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using integrated step selection to determine effects of predation risk on bison habitat selection and movement

Animal movement is a fundamental mechanism that shapes communities and ecosystems. Ungulates alter the ecosystems they inhabit and understanding their movements and distribution is critical for linking habitat with population dynamics. Predation risk has been shown to strongly influence ungulate movement patterns, such that ungulates may select habitat where predation risk is lower (refugia), adjust movement rates, temporal patterns, or selection of cover variables in areas with greater predation risk. We evaluated potential predation avoidance behavior in a population of plains bison inhabiting the north rim of Grand Canyon National Park (GRCA) and adjacent Kaibab National Forest (KNF). The KNF has year-round hunting managed by Arizona Game and Fish Department, whereas hunting is not allowed in GRCA. Human-maintained water sources on the KNF are particularly important resources for bison wherein they may be exposed to higher predation risk to access these resources. We used 2-h GPS locations for three years from 31 bison (n = 9 males; n = 22 females), and integrative step selection analysis to test four hypotheses about the potential for bison to reduce their risk from human predation by avoiding areas of high predation risk; moving faster in areas with high predation risk; entering high-risk areas at night when risk is reduced; and entering high-risk areas in habitats that provide cover (coniferous forest). The highest performing model indicated bison movement was 1.3 times faster per 2-h step interval than in areas with no hunting across all vegetation classes (coniferous forest, shrub, quaking aspen, grass-forb meadow) and across all topography classes (valley, slope, ridge). Bison moved more slowly in grass-forb meadows than all other vegetation types, and in valleys relative to slopes and ridges. Several radio-collared individuals had no GPS locations in KNF for the duration of the study. Bison avoided predation risk using two strategies: moving faster while in the KNF, and fully avoiding high-risk areas by remaining within GRCA. Management that manipulates or reduces timing of hunting seasons may reduce perceived predation risk and encourage bison to distribute into the KNF and across a broader range of available habitat.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
期刊最新文献
Climate gradient-driven intraspecific aggregation propensity linked to interpatch modulation in grassland communities Exploratory modeling of social-ecological systems Heat wave impacts on crop-pest dynamics are dependent upon insect ontogeny and plant resistance Long-term tracking captures the timing of ontogenetic niche shifts in northeast Pacific white sharks Invasive annual grasses destabilize plant communities in a northern mixed-grass prairie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1