甲状腺乳头状癌患者宫颈中央淋巴结转移风险分层提名图。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-284
Ying Zou, Yan Shi, Hai Bi, Junyan Tan, Qingwei Guo, Yi Qin, Xiudi Lu, Xiaojing Ma, Shouhong Yang, Jihua Liu
{"title":"甲状腺乳头状癌患者宫颈中央淋巴结转移风险分层提名图。","authors":"Ying Zou, Yan Shi, Hai Bi, Junyan Tan, Qingwei Guo, Yi Qin, Xiudi Lu, Xiaojing Ma, Shouhong Yang, Jihua Liu","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether to perform prophylactic central lymph node dissection for cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients is still controversial. This retrospective study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on ultrasound and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the risk stratification of central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) in patients with PTC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 525 patients from 2017 to 2019 [Tianjin First Central Hospital (Hospital A)] were retrospectively analyzed to form the training cohort and to conduct internal validation. Another group of 204 patients in 2020 (Hospital A) formed the temporal validation cohort. A total of 107 patients in 2020 [Binzhou Medical University Hospital (Hospital B)] formed the geographic validation cohort, which was a retrospective cohort study. The area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. The locally weighted regression curve was used for risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diameter, taller-than-wide, calcification, capsular invasion, and iodine concentration in the arterial and venous phases were independent risk predictors of CLNM. The AUC of the nomogram was 0.922 (95% confidence interval: 0.895-0.943) in the training cohort. Two external validation cohorts demonstrated the good performance of the nomogram in predicting CLNM, with AUCs of 0.912 and 0.861. The significantly improved net reclassification index and integrated discriminatory improvement index indicated that DECT was a powerful supplement to ultrasound for predicting CLNM. The risk stratification system divided all patients into low-risk (0-50 points), intermediate-risk (51-100 points), and high-risk groups (>100 points).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The nomogram and risk stratification system estimated the utility of CLNM to guide individualized treatment of patients with PTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A nomogram for risk stratification of central cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Zou, Yan Shi, Hai Bi, Junyan Tan, Qingwei Guo, Yi Qin, Xiudi Lu, Xiaojing Ma, Shouhong Yang, Jihua Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/qims-24-284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether to perform prophylactic central lymph node dissection for cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients is still controversial. This retrospective study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on ultrasound and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the risk stratification of central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) in patients with PTC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 525 patients from 2017 to 2019 [Tianjin First Central Hospital (Hospital A)] were retrospectively analyzed to form the training cohort and to conduct internal validation. Another group of 204 patients in 2020 (Hospital A) formed the temporal validation cohort. A total of 107 patients in 2020 [Binzhou Medical University Hospital (Hospital B)] formed the geographic validation cohort, which was a retrospective cohort study. The area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. The locally weighted regression curve was used for risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diameter, taller-than-wide, calcification, capsular invasion, and iodine concentration in the arterial and venous phases were independent risk predictors of CLNM. The AUC of the nomogram was 0.922 (95% confidence interval: 0.895-0.943) in the training cohort. Two external validation cohorts demonstrated the good performance of the nomogram in predicting CLNM, with AUCs of 0.912 and 0.861. The significantly improved net reclassification index and integrated discriminatory improvement index indicated that DECT was a powerful supplement to ultrasound for predicting CLNM. The risk stratification system divided all patients into low-risk (0-50 points), intermediate-risk (51-100 points), and high-risk groups (>100 points).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The nomogram and risk stratification system estimated the utility of CLNM to guide individualized treatment of patients with PTC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250316/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-284\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:是否对cN0甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者进行预防性中央淋巴结清扫仍存在争议。这项回顾性研究旨在开发和验证基于超声和双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)的提名图,用于PTC患者中央淋巴结转移(CLNM)的风险分层:回顾性分析2017年至2019年[天津市第一中心医院(A医院)]共525例患者,形成训练队列并进行内部验证。另一组 204 名 2020 年(A 医院)患者组成时间验证队列。2020年[滨州医科大学附属医院(B医院)]共有107名患者组成地理验证队列,这是一项回顾性队列研究。曲线下面积(AUC)、校准曲线和决策曲线用于评估提名图的性能。局部加权回归曲线用于风险分层:直径、高大于宽、钙化、囊腔侵犯、动静脉期碘浓度是预测 CLNM 的独立风险因素。在训练队列中,提名图的AUC为0.922(95%置信区间:0.895-0.943)。两个外部验证队列证明了提名图在预测 CLNM 方面的良好性能,AUC 分别为 0.912 和 0.861。明显改善的净再分类指数和综合判别改善指数表明,DECT是超声波预测CLNM的有力补充。风险分层系统将所有患者分为低风险组(0-50 分)、中风险组(51-100 分)和高风险组(>100 分):该提名图和风险分层系统估计了CLNM在指导PTC患者个体化治疗方面的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A nomogram for risk stratification of central cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Background: Whether to perform prophylactic central lymph node dissection for cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients is still controversial. This retrospective study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on ultrasound and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the risk stratification of central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) in patients with PTC.

Methods: A total of 525 patients from 2017 to 2019 [Tianjin First Central Hospital (Hospital A)] were retrospectively analyzed to form the training cohort and to conduct internal validation. Another group of 204 patients in 2020 (Hospital A) formed the temporal validation cohort. A total of 107 patients in 2020 [Binzhou Medical University Hospital (Hospital B)] formed the geographic validation cohort, which was a retrospective cohort study. The area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. The locally weighted regression curve was used for risk stratification.

Results: Diameter, taller-than-wide, calcification, capsular invasion, and iodine concentration in the arterial and venous phases were independent risk predictors of CLNM. The AUC of the nomogram was 0.922 (95% confidence interval: 0.895-0.943) in the training cohort. Two external validation cohorts demonstrated the good performance of the nomogram in predicting CLNM, with AUCs of 0.912 and 0.861. The significantly improved net reclassification index and integrated discriminatory improvement index indicated that DECT was a powerful supplement to ultrasound for predicting CLNM. The risk stratification system divided all patients into low-risk (0-50 points), intermediate-risk (51-100 points), and high-risk groups (>100 points).

Conclusions: The nomogram and risk stratification system estimated the utility of CLNM to guide individualized treatment of patients with PTC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Comparison of single shot and multishot diffusion-weighted imaging in 5-T magnetic resonance imaging for brain disease diagnosis. Complications of synchronous microwave ablation and biopsy versus microwave ablation alone for pulmonary sub-solid nodules: a retrospective, large sample, case-control study. Congenital uterine arteriovenous malformation treated by hysterectomy: a description of two cases. Diagnostic value of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality score for bone mineral density assessment: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Dilated multi-scale residual attention (DMRA) U-Net: three-dimensional (3D) dilated multi-scale residual attention U-Net for brain tumor segmentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1