发电系统评估:新方法

J. Bassey, I. Odesola
{"title":"发电系统评估:新方法","authors":"J. Bassey, I. Odesola","doi":"10.47191/etj/v9i07.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Power generation systems have become useful for grid base and off grid electric power generation. Hence, its performance has become critical for sustainable growth and development. Performance evaluation of power generation systems has always been carried out using the independent assessment approach (IAA) whose models are: the reliability, availability, emission characteristics, energy and exergy efficiency. The IAA approach only assesses the system performance in part without recur to other indexes, hence, limiting a holistic view of the true plant state. In this paper, the development of a new performance index using the combined assessment approach (CAA) is explored. This approach (CAA) seeks to combine two relatable traditional measures for the assessment of power generation system. The model combines exergy efficiency and reliability measures for analysis. First Independent Power Limited (FIPL) gas turbine power plant was used to test the model. The plant reliability and availability were evaluated along with its thermal efficiency using the exergy model. The analysis of plant thermal efficiency was carried out using the steady state model. Results of the traditional indexes of the plant were compared with the proposed (Bassy-II index) index. It was seen that the new index provided a new assessment criteria. The exergy efficiency, reliability and availability measures indicated a fairly rated plant state. However, the new index defined a new plant state which is unique and represents the true status of the system in whole. Hence, the proposed index (Bassy-II index) is recommended for use in the holistic assessment of power generation systems.","PeriodicalId":11630,"journal":{"name":"Engineering and Technology Journal","volume":"33 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power Generation Systems Assessment: A New Approach\",\"authors\":\"J. Bassey, I. Odesola\",\"doi\":\"10.47191/etj/v9i07.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Power generation systems have become useful for grid base and off grid electric power generation. Hence, its performance has become critical for sustainable growth and development. Performance evaluation of power generation systems has always been carried out using the independent assessment approach (IAA) whose models are: the reliability, availability, emission characteristics, energy and exergy efficiency. The IAA approach only assesses the system performance in part without recur to other indexes, hence, limiting a holistic view of the true plant state. In this paper, the development of a new performance index using the combined assessment approach (CAA) is explored. This approach (CAA) seeks to combine two relatable traditional measures for the assessment of power generation system. The model combines exergy efficiency and reliability measures for analysis. First Independent Power Limited (FIPL) gas turbine power plant was used to test the model. The plant reliability and availability were evaluated along with its thermal efficiency using the exergy model. The analysis of plant thermal efficiency was carried out using the steady state model. Results of the traditional indexes of the plant were compared with the proposed (Bassy-II index) index. It was seen that the new index provided a new assessment criteria. The exergy efficiency, reliability and availability measures indicated a fairly rated plant state. However, the new index defined a new plant state which is unique and represents the true status of the system in whole. Hence, the proposed index (Bassy-II index) is recommended for use in the holistic assessment of power generation systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering and Technology Journal\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering and Technology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47191/etj/v9i07.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering and Technology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47191/etj/v9i07.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发电系统已成为电网基础和离网发电的有用工具。因此,发电系统的性能对于可持续增长和发展至关重要。发电系统的性能评估一直采用独立评估法(IAA),其模型包括:可靠性、可用性、排放特性、能效和放能效。IAA 方法只评估了系统的部分性能,而没有考虑其他指标,因此限制了对发电厂真实状态的全面了解。本文探讨了使用综合评估方法(CAA)开发新的性能指标。这种方法(CAA)旨在结合两种相关的传统衡量标准来评估发电系统。该模型结合了能效和可靠性指标进行分析。第一独立电力有限公司(FIPL)的燃气轮机发电厂被用来测试该模型。利用该模型对发电厂的可靠性和可用性以及热效率进行了评估。使用稳态模型对电厂热效率进行了分析。电厂传统指标的结果与提议的指标(Bassy-II 指标)进行了比较。结果表明,新指数提供了新的评估标准。发电厂的能效、可靠性和可用性测量结果表明,发电厂的状态得到了很好的评价。然而,新指数定义了一种新的电厂状态,它是唯一的,代表了整个系统的真实状态。因此,建议在发电系统的整体评估中使用所提出的指数(Bassy-II 指数)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Power Generation Systems Assessment: A New Approach
Power generation systems have become useful for grid base and off grid electric power generation. Hence, its performance has become critical for sustainable growth and development. Performance evaluation of power generation systems has always been carried out using the independent assessment approach (IAA) whose models are: the reliability, availability, emission characteristics, energy and exergy efficiency. The IAA approach only assesses the system performance in part without recur to other indexes, hence, limiting a holistic view of the true plant state. In this paper, the development of a new performance index using the combined assessment approach (CAA) is explored. This approach (CAA) seeks to combine two relatable traditional measures for the assessment of power generation system. The model combines exergy efficiency and reliability measures for analysis. First Independent Power Limited (FIPL) gas turbine power plant was used to test the model. The plant reliability and availability were evaluated along with its thermal efficiency using the exergy model. The analysis of plant thermal efficiency was carried out using the steady state model. Results of the traditional indexes of the plant were compared with the proposed (Bassy-II index) index. It was seen that the new index provided a new assessment criteria. The exergy efficiency, reliability and availability measures indicated a fairly rated plant state. However, the new index defined a new plant state which is unique and represents the true status of the system in whole. Hence, the proposed index (Bassy-II index) is recommended for use in the holistic assessment of power generation systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overview on Technologies for Combating Interference and Noise Management in 5G and Beyond Network AI Chatbots in LMS: A Pedagogical Review of Cognitive, Constructivist, and Adaptive Principles Development of Interactive Learning Media Based on the Aleis (ATC Licensce Exam Information System) Website for Air Traffic Controllers at Makassar Aviation Polytechnic Analysis of prestressed concrete beams experimentally utilizing steel strands and CFRP bars Artificial Intelligence Based Essay Grading System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1