老年人在线听觉能力筛查:初步考虑

Marina Englert, Leticia Borges, Sandro Soares Almeida, Ingrid Gielow
{"title":"老年人在线听觉能力筛查:初步考虑","authors":"Marina Englert, Leticia Borges, Sandro Soares Almeida, Ingrid Gielow","doi":"10.46634/riics.311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To analyze the results of AudBility's online screening in the elderly to assess its viability.\nMethodology. The study included 40 elderly participants (mean age 67.4 years). They underwent online AudBility screening and completed a self-assessment questionnaire along with tests assessing seven auditory skills: sound localization (SL), dichotic digits task, speech perception in noise, auditory closure, staggered dichotic words test (SDW), temporal resolution, and temporal ordering. Descriptive data analysis considered AudBility's reference parameters: <50% = abnormal, 51-79% caution, >80% = normal.\nResults. The tests with the highest frequency of abnormalities were SL and temporal ordering frequency (TOF), both with 22.5%. On average, these tests were considered as \"caution\" (SL = 72.75%; TOF = 67.5%). The self-assessment questionnaire had the highest frequency of \"caution\" results (52.5%), followed by SDW (35%) and TOF (32.5%). On average, the self-assessment questionnaire and TOF showed caution values (74.41% and 67.5%, respectively). SDW had normal average values (81.5%). No test showed abnormal average values.\nConclusion. Auditory screening using AudBility can serve as an entry point for assessing auditory and cognitive health in the elderly population, guiding referrals and therapies before in-person interventions.","PeriodicalId":508578,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online Auditory Abilities Screening in Elderly: Initial Considerations\",\"authors\":\"Marina Englert, Leticia Borges, Sandro Soares Almeida, Ingrid Gielow\",\"doi\":\"10.46634/riics.311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. To analyze the results of AudBility's online screening in the elderly to assess its viability.\\nMethodology. The study included 40 elderly participants (mean age 67.4 years). They underwent online AudBility screening and completed a self-assessment questionnaire along with tests assessing seven auditory skills: sound localization (SL), dichotic digits task, speech perception in noise, auditory closure, staggered dichotic words test (SDW), temporal resolution, and temporal ordering. Descriptive data analysis considered AudBility's reference parameters: <50% = abnormal, 51-79% caution, >80% = normal.\\nResults. The tests with the highest frequency of abnormalities were SL and temporal ordering frequency (TOF), both with 22.5%. On average, these tests were considered as \\\"caution\\\" (SL = 72.75%; TOF = 67.5%). The self-assessment questionnaire had the highest frequency of \\\"caution\\\" results (52.5%), followed by SDW (35%) and TOF (32.5%). On average, the self-assessment questionnaire and TOF showed caution values (74.41% and 67.5%, respectively). SDW had normal average values (81.5%). No test showed abnormal average values.\\nConclusion. Auditory screening using AudBility can serve as an entry point for assessing auditory and cognitive health in the elderly population, guiding referrals and therapies before in-person interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析 AudBility 对老年人进行在线筛查的结果,以评估其可行性。研究对象包括 40 名老年人(平均年龄 67.4 岁)。他们接受了AudBility在线筛查,并完成了自我评估问卷以及七项听觉技能评估测试:声音定位(SL)、二分法任务、噪音中的言语感知、听觉闭合、交错二分法单词测试(SDW)、时间分辨率和时间排序。描述性数据分析考虑了 AudBility 的参考参数:80% = 正常。异常频率最高的测试是SL和颞排序频率(TOF),均为22.5%。平均而言,这些测试被视为 "谨慎"(SL = 72.75%;TOF = 67.5%)。自我评估问卷中出现 "谨慎 "结果的频率最高(52.5%),其次是 SDW(35%)和 TOF(32.5%)。平均而言,自评问卷和 TOF 的结果显示为谨慎值(分别为 74.41% 和 67.5%)。SDW的平均值正常(81.5%)。没有一项测试的平均值出现异常。使用 AudBility 进行听觉筛查可作为评估老年人听觉和认知健康状况的切入点,在面对面干预之前为转诊和治疗提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Online Auditory Abilities Screening in Elderly: Initial Considerations
Objective. To analyze the results of AudBility's online screening in the elderly to assess its viability. Methodology. The study included 40 elderly participants (mean age 67.4 years). They underwent online AudBility screening and completed a self-assessment questionnaire along with tests assessing seven auditory skills: sound localization (SL), dichotic digits task, speech perception in noise, auditory closure, staggered dichotic words test (SDW), temporal resolution, and temporal ordering. Descriptive data analysis considered AudBility's reference parameters: <50% = abnormal, 51-79% caution, >80% = normal. Results. The tests with the highest frequency of abnormalities were SL and temporal ordering frequency (TOF), both with 22.5%. On average, these tests were considered as "caution" (SL = 72.75%; TOF = 67.5%). The self-assessment questionnaire had the highest frequency of "caution" results (52.5%), followed by SDW (35%) and TOF (32.5%). On average, the self-assessment questionnaire and TOF showed caution values (74.41% and 67.5%, respectively). SDW had normal average values (81.5%). No test showed abnormal average values. Conclusion. Auditory screening using AudBility can serve as an entry point for assessing auditory and cognitive health in the elderly population, guiding referrals and therapies before in-person interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Riesgo cariogénico en presencia de alimentos de variado índice glicémico en estudiantes de odontología. Estudio transversal Estigma social del sobrepeso y obesidad en niños de escuela primaria: una revisión sistemática Online Auditory Abilities Screening in Elderly: Initial Considerations Sensibilidad al cambio del Voice Handicap Index y su versión abreviada, adaptados al español rioplatense de Argentina (Índice de Desventaja Vocal) Are Mindfulness and Sleep Predictors of Cognitive Fatigue in Student Athletes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1