医院药剂师对药物间相互作用的认识和决策。

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy Pub Date : 2019-07-01 Epub Date: 2018-08-31
Harkaryn Bagri, Karen Dahri, Michael Legal
{"title":"医院药剂师对药物间相互作用的认识和决策。","authors":"Harkaryn Bagri, Karen Dahri, Michael Legal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacists often overlook drug interaction alerts because of limitations in clinical decision support (CDS) software systems intended to detect evidence-based, clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Alert fatigue, which occurs when pharmacists become desensitized to an overload of DDIs, may also contribute.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To gain a better understanding of how pharmacists assess common DDIs and the extent to which computerized drug alerts affect their decision-making, as background for initiatives to overcome alert fatigue and improve detection of DDIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study used focus group methodology. A structured focus group was planned at each of 3 large tertiary hospitals. Pharmacists were invited to participate if their jobs included patient care and/or dispensary responsibilities. The focus group discussions were audio-recorded and subsequently transcribed, analyzed, and coded into themes using NVivo software. Four main categories of themes were identified: perceived challenges, pharmacists' assessment of DDIs, barriers to responding to alerts, and proposed solutions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants (<i>n</i> = 24) described a large discrepancy among CDS software systems in terms of the severity of specific DDIs, which made it difficult to view these systems as reliable sources. The participants agreed that alert fatigue is present and contributes to DDIs being overlooked. However, lack of patient information to make an initial assessment, as well as the constant need for multitasking, prevents pharmacists from focusing on the evaluation of DDIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although alert fatigue was reported to be a common factor responsible for pharmacists missing DDIs, other barriers also exist. Participants suggested ways to limit DDI alerts to those that are clinically relevant. Having a collaborative team of pharmacists periodically review the DDIs embedded in the CDS system, incorporating a colour-code system, and removing duplicate entries were discussed as ways to improve system efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital Pharmacists' Perceptions and Decision-Making Related to Drug-Drug Interactions.\",\"authors\":\"Harkaryn Bagri, Karen Dahri, Michael Legal\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacists often overlook drug interaction alerts because of limitations in clinical decision support (CDS) software systems intended to detect evidence-based, clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Alert fatigue, which occurs when pharmacists become desensitized to an overload of DDIs, may also contribute.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To gain a better understanding of how pharmacists assess common DDIs and the extent to which computerized drug alerts affect their decision-making, as background for initiatives to overcome alert fatigue and improve detection of DDIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study used focus group methodology. A structured focus group was planned at each of 3 large tertiary hospitals. Pharmacists were invited to participate if their jobs included patient care and/or dispensary responsibilities. The focus group discussions were audio-recorded and subsequently transcribed, analyzed, and coded into themes using NVivo software. Four main categories of themes were identified: perceived challenges, pharmacists' assessment of DDIs, barriers to responding to alerts, and proposed solutions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants (<i>n</i> = 24) described a large discrepancy among CDS software systems in terms of the severity of specific DDIs, which made it difficult to view these systems as reliable sources. The participants agreed that alert fatigue is present and contributes to DDIs being overlooked. However, lack of patient information to make an initial assessment, as well as the constant need for multitasking, prevents pharmacists from focusing on the evaluation of DDIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although alert fatigue was reported to be a common factor responsible for pharmacists missing DDIs, other barriers also exist. Participants suggested ways to limit DDI alerts to those that are clinically relevant. Having a collaborative team of pharmacists periodically review the DDIs embedded in the CDS system, incorporating a colour-code system, and removing duplicate entries were discussed as ways to improve system efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699872/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/8/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于临床决策支持(CDS)软件系统的局限性,药剂师经常忽略药物相互作用警报,而该系统旨在检测基于证据的、具有临床意义的药物相互作用(DDI)。药剂师对过量的 DDIs 不敏感而产生的 "警报疲劳 "也可能是原因之一:更好地了解药剂师如何评估常见的 DDIs 以及计算机化药物警报对其决策的影响程度,从而为克服警报疲劳和改进 DDIs 检测的措施提供背景资料:这项定性研究采用焦点小组方法。计划在 3 家大型三甲医院各组织一个结构化焦点小组。如果药剂师的工作包括患者护理和/或药房职责,则邀请他们参加。对焦点小组的讨论进行了录音,随后使用 NVivo 软件进行了转录、分析和主题编码。确定了四大类主题:感知到的挑战、药剂师对 DDI 的评估、响应警报的障碍和建议的解决方案:参与者(n = 24)描述了 CDS 软件系统在特定 DDIs 严重程度方面存在的巨大差异,因此很难将这些系统视为可靠的来源。与会者一致认为,警报疲劳是存在的,也是导致 DDI 被忽视的原因之一。然而,由于缺乏患者信息来进行初步评估,以及经常需要处理多项任务,药剂师无法专注于对 DDI 的评估:结论:尽管报告称警报疲劳是导致药剂师遗漏 DDI 的常见因素,但也存在其他障碍。与会者提出了将 DDI 警报限制在与临床相关的范围内的方法。与会者讨论了由药剂师组成的合作团队定期审查 CDS 系统中的 DDIs、采用彩色编码系统以及删除重复条目等提高系统效率的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hospital Pharmacists' Perceptions and Decision-Making Related to Drug-Drug Interactions.

Background: Pharmacists often overlook drug interaction alerts because of limitations in clinical decision support (CDS) software systems intended to detect evidence-based, clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Alert fatigue, which occurs when pharmacists become desensitized to an overload of DDIs, may also contribute.

Objectives: To gain a better understanding of how pharmacists assess common DDIs and the extent to which computerized drug alerts affect their decision-making, as background for initiatives to overcome alert fatigue and improve detection of DDIs.

Methods: This qualitative study used focus group methodology. A structured focus group was planned at each of 3 large tertiary hospitals. Pharmacists were invited to participate if their jobs included patient care and/or dispensary responsibilities. The focus group discussions were audio-recorded and subsequently transcribed, analyzed, and coded into themes using NVivo software. Four main categories of themes were identified: perceived challenges, pharmacists' assessment of DDIs, barriers to responding to alerts, and proposed solutions.

Results: The participants (n = 24) described a large discrepancy among CDS software systems in terms of the severity of specific DDIs, which made it difficult to view these systems as reliable sources. The participants agreed that alert fatigue is present and contributes to DDIs being overlooked. However, lack of patient information to make an initial assessment, as well as the constant need for multitasking, prevents pharmacists from focusing on the evaluation of DDIs.

Conclusions: Although alert fatigue was reported to be a common factor responsible for pharmacists missing DDIs, other barriers also exist. Participants suggested ways to limit DDI alerts to those that are clinically relevant. Having a collaborative team of pharmacists periodically review the DDIs embedded in the CDS system, incorporating a colour-code system, and removing duplicate entries were discussed as ways to improve system efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adverse Drug Reactions and Predictors of Medication Adherence in Patients with Prostate Cancer. Changes in Acute Care Pharmacist Prescribing and Laboratory Ordering over Time: CAPLET Study. Continuous IV Deferoxamine for Chronic Iron Overload in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis by Home Parenteral Therapy: A Case Report and Literature Review. Efficacité de 6 scénarios de décontamination de bras de fauteuils contaminés volontairement au cyclophosphamide. Glycemic Management in Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: Evaluation of Glycemic Control and Drug Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1