开放科学背景下基于中文引文数据的中国五项指标跨学科性研究

IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Information Science Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1177/01655515241263286
Hongyu Zhao, Xu Wang
{"title":"开放科学背景下基于中文引文数据的中国五项指标跨学科性研究","authors":"Hongyu Zhao, Xu Wang","doi":"10.1177/01655515241263286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theories, methods and techniques of bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, webometrics and knowledgometrics together constitute Five-Metrics. Five-Metrics is one of the most active research fields in China’s library and information science (LIS), and the research on Five-Metrics in China is characterised by the diversity of disciplines. Quantitative analysis of interdisciplinary research in Five-Metrics of China reveals the disciplinary origin and knowledge structure of Chinese Five-Metrics, grasps the interdisciplinary patterns and laws of Five-Metrics, and helps promote international exchange and cooperation, innovation and development of Five-Metrics research in the context of open science. Based on the theory of knowledge flow, this study uses a combination of citation analysis, mathematical modelling analysis, social network analysis and statistical analysis. We study the interdisciplinary degree of Five-Metrics based on 20,528 publications and corresponding 207,530 reference records and 111,823 citing article records, using a combination of python, gephi, origin and other tools. The results show that the interdisciplinarity of Five-Metrics publications and knowledge flow at the macroscopic level is high, and interdisciplinarity of the cited references and citing articles of Five-Metrics is higher. At the microscopic level, there is a wide gap in the interdisciplinarity of Five-Metrics in different disciplines. In addition, this study identifies three interdisciplinary knowledge flow patterns of Five-Metrics of China. This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the interdisciplinary Five-Metrics study in China based on the cited references, publications and citing articles.","PeriodicalId":54796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Science","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on interdisciplinarity of five-metrics in China based on Chinese Citation Data under the background of open science\",\"authors\":\"Hongyu Zhao, Xu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01655515241263286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The theories, methods and techniques of bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, webometrics and knowledgometrics together constitute Five-Metrics. Five-Metrics is one of the most active research fields in China’s library and information science (LIS), and the research on Five-Metrics in China is characterised by the diversity of disciplines. Quantitative analysis of interdisciplinary research in Five-Metrics of China reveals the disciplinary origin and knowledge structure of Chinese Five-Metrics, grasps the interdisciplinary patterns and laws of Five-Metrics, and helps promote international exchange and cooperation, innovation and development of Five-Metrics research in the context of open science. Based on the theory of knowledge flow, this study uses a combination of citation analysis, mathematical modelling analysis, social network analysis and statistical analysis. We study the interdisciplinary degree of Five-Metrics based on 20,528 publications and corresponding 207,530 reference records and 111,823 citing article records, using a combination of python, gephi, origin and other tools. The results show that the interdisciplinarity of Five-Metrics publications and knowledge flow at the macroscopic level is high, and interdisciplinarity of the cited references and citing articles of Five-Metrics is higher. At the microscopic level, there is a wide gap in the interdisciplinarity of Five-Metrics in different disciplines. In addition, this study identifies three interdisciplinary knowledge flow patterns of Five-Metrics of China. This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the interdisciplinary Five-Metrics study in China based on the cited references, publications and citing articles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Science\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515241263286\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515241263286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文献计量学、科学计量学、信息计量学、网络计量学和知识计量学的理论、方法和技术共同构成了五大计量学。五项计量学是中国图书馆与信息科学(LIS)最活跃的研究领域之一,中国的五项计量学研究具有学科多样性的特点。对中国 "五尺度 "跨学科研究的定量分析,揭示了中国 "五尺度 "的学科渊源和知识结构,把握了 "五尺度 "的学科交叉模式和规律,有助于促进开放科学背景下 "五尺度 "研究的国际交流与合作、创新与发展。本研究以知识流理论为基础,综合运用引文分析、数学建模分析、社会网络分析和统计分析等方法。我们基于20528篇出版物及相应的207530条参考文献记录和111823条引用文章记录,结合使用python、gephi、origin等工具,研究了Five-Metrics的跨学科程度。结果表明,在宏观层面,五项指标的出版物和知识流的跨学科性较高,五项指标的被引参考文献和引用文章的跨学科性较高。在微观层面,不同学科的《五度量衡》跨学科性差距较大。此外,本研究还发现了中国五项指标的三种跨学科知识流动模式。本研究以引用文献、出版物和引用文章为基础,对中国的 "五度量衡 "跨学科研究进行了全面分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research on interdisciplinarity of five-metrics in China based on Chinese Citation Data under the background of open science
The theories, methods and techniques of bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, webometrics and knowledgometrics together constitute Five-Metrics. Five-Metrics is one of the most active research fields in China’s library and information science (LIS), and the research on Five-Metrics in China is characterised by the diversity of disciplines. Quantitative analysis of interdisciplinary research in Five-Metrics of China reveals the disciplinary origin and knowledge structure of Chinese Five-Metrics, grasps the interdisciplinary patterns and laws of Five-Metrics, and helps promote international exchange and cooperation, innovation and development of Five-Metrics research in the context of open science. Based on the theory of knowledge flow, this study uses a combination of citation analysis, mathematical modelling analysis, social network analysis and statistical analysis. We study the interdisciplinary degree of Five-Metrics based on 20,528 publications and corresponding 207,530 reference records and 111,823 citing article records, using a combination of python, gephi, origin and other tools. The results show that the interdisciplinarity of Five-Metrics publications and knowledge flow at the macroscopic level is high, and interdisciplinarity of the cited references and citing articles of Five-Metrics is higher. At the microscopic level, there is a wide gap in the interdisciplinarity of Five-Metrics in different disciplines. In addition, this study identifies three interdisciplinary knowledge flow patterns of Five-Metrics of China. This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the interdisciplinary Five-Metrics study in China based on the cited references, publications and citing articles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Science
Journal of Information Science 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
121
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Information Science is a peer-reviewed international journal of high repute covering topics of interest to all those researching and working in the sciences of information and knowledge management. The Editors welcome material on any aspect of information science theory, policy, application or practice that will advance thinking in the field.
期刊最新文献
Government chatbot: Empowering smart conversations with enhanced contextual understanding and reasoning Knowing within multispecies families: An information experience study How are global university rankings adjusted for erroneous science, fraud and misconduct? Posterior reduction or adjustment in rankings in response to retractions and invalidation of scientific findings Predicting the technological impact of papers: Exploring optimal models and most important features Cross-domain corpus selection for cold-start context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1