比较切除术、消融术和立体定向体放疗治疗 5 厘米以下单发肝细胞癌:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY International journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000001977
Yizhen Fu, Zhoutian Yang, Shiliang Liu, Renguo Guan, Xiaohui Wang, Jinbin Chen, Juncheng Wang, Yangxun Pan, Mengzhong Liu, Minshan Chen, Mian Xi, Yaojun Zhang
{"title":"比较切除术、消融术和立体定向体放疗治疗 5 厘米以下单发肝细胞癌:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。","authors":"Yizhen Fu, Zhoutian Yang, Shiliang Liu, Renguo Guan, Xiaohui Wang, Jinbin Chen, Juncheng Wang, Yangxun Pan, Mengzhong Liu, Minshan Chen, Mian Xi, Yaojun Zhang","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000001977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have focused on the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for curative intention. This study aims to determine the best option among resection, ablation and SBRT in dealing with single HCC no more than 5 cm.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 985 patients from 3 hospitals: 495, 335 and 155 in the resection, ablation and SBRT groups, respectively between January 2014 and December 2021. Subgroup analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SBRT group had unfavorable clinical features including larger tumor size, poorer liver function and more relapsed tumors. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS) rates were 84.3%, 66.8% and 56.2% with resection, 73.3%, 49.8% and 37.2% with ablation and 73.2%, 56.4% and 53.6% with SBRT, respectively (P<0.001). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 89.0%, 89.2% and 88.8% in the resection, ablation and SBRT group, respectively (P=0.590). The three modalities resulted in similar RFS and OS after adjusting for clinical factors. Resection provided ideal local tumor control, successively followed by SBRT and ablation. SBRT led to comparable RFS time compared to resection for tumors < 3 cm (HR=0.75, P=0.205), relapsed tumors (HR=0.83, P=0.420) and patients with poor liver function (HR=0.70, P=0.330). In addition, SBRT was superior to ablation regarding RFS when tumors were adjacent to intra-hepatic vessels (HR=0.64, P=0.031). SBRT were more minimally invasive, however, gastrointestinal disorders, hepatic inflammation and myelosuppression occurred more frequently.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All three approaches could be applied as curative options. Resection remains the best choice for preventing tumor recurrence, and SBRT showed advantages in treating small, recurrent and vascular-type lesions as well as patients with relatively poor liver function.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of resection, ablation and stereotactic body radiation therapy in treating solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 5 cm: a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yizhen Fu, Zhoutian Yang, Shiliang Liu, Renguo Guan, Xiaohui Wang, Jinbin Chen, Juncheng Wang, Yangxun Pan, Mengzhong Liu, Minshan Chen, Mian Xi, Yaojun Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000001977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have focused on the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for curative intention. This study aims to determine the best option among resection, ablation and SBRT in dealing with single HCC no more than 5 cm.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 985 patients from 3 hospitals: 495, 335 and 155 in the resection, ablation and SBRT groups, respectively between January 2014 and December 2021. Subgroup analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SBRT group had unfavorable clinical features including larger tumor size, poorer liver function and more relapsed tumors. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS) rates were 84.3%, 66.8% and 56.2% with resection, 73.3%, 49.8% and 37.2% with ablation and 73.2%, 56.4% and 53.6% with SBRT, respectively (P<0.001). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 89.0%, 89.2% and 88.8% in the resection, ablation and SBRT group, respectively (P=0.590). The three modalities resulted in similar RFS and OS after adjusting for clinical factors. Resection provided ideal local tumor control, successively followed by SBRT and ablation. SBRT led to comparable RFS time compared to resection for tumors < 3 cm (HR=0.75, P=0.205), relapsed tumors (HR=0.83, P=0.420) and patients with poor liver function (HR=0.70, P=0.330). In addition, SBRT was superior to ablation regarding RFS when tumors were adjacent to intra-hepatic vessels (HR=0.64, P=0.031). SBRT were more minimally invasive, however, gastrointestinal disorders, hepatic inflammation and myelosuppression occurred more frequently.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All three approaches could be applied as curative options. Resection remains the best choice for preventing tumor recurrence, and SBRT showed advantages in treating small, recurrent and vascular-type lesions as well as patients with relatively poor liver function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001977\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001977","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:很少有研究关注立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)治疗早期肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效。本研究旨在确定切除术、消融术和 SBRT 之间的最佳方案,以治疗不超过 5 厘米的单发 HCC:这项多中心回顾性队列研究纳入了来自 3 家医院的 985 名患者:2014年1月至2021年12月期间,切除组、消融组和SBRT组分别有495名、335名和155名患者。研究进行了亚组分析和倾向得分匹配(PSM):SBRT组的临床特征较差,包括肿瘤体积较大、肝功能较差和复发肿瘤较多。切除术的1年、3年和5年无复发生存率(RFS)分别为84.3%、66.8%和56.2%,消融术的1年、3年和5年无复发生存率分别为73.3%、49.8%和37.2%,SBRT的1年、3年和5年无复发生存率分别为73.2%、56.4%和53.6%:这三种方法均可作为根治选择。切除术仍是预防肿瘤复发的最佳选择,而 SBRT 在治疗小病灶、复发性病灶、血管型病灶以及肝功能相对较差的患者方面显示出优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of resection, ablation and stereotactic body radiation therapy in treating solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 5 cm: a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study.

Background: Few studies have focused on the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for curative intention. This study aims to determine the best option among resection, ablation and SBRT in dealing with single HCC no more than 5 cm.

Materials and methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 985 patients from 3 hospitals: 495, 335 and 155 in the resection, ablation and SBRT groups, respectively between January 2014 and December 2021. Subgroup analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) were performed.

Results: The SBRT group had unfavorable clinical features including larger tumor size, poorer liver function and more relapsed tumors. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS) rates were 84.3%, 66.8% and 56.2% with resection, 73.3%, 49.8% and 37.2% with ablation and 73.2%, 56.4% and 53.6% with SBRT, respectively (P<0.001). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 89.0%, 89.2% and 88.8% in the resection, ablation and SBRT group, respectively (P=0.590). The three modalities resulted in similar RFS and OS after adjusting for clinical factors. Resection provided ideal local tumor control, successively followed by SBRT and ablation. SBRT led to comparable RFS time compared to resection for tumors < 3 cm (HR=0.75, P=0.205), relapsed tumors (HR=0.83, P=0.420) and patients with poor liver function (HR=0.70, P=0.330). In addition, SBRT was superior to ablation regarding RFS when tumors were adjacent to intra-hepatic vessels (HR=0.64, P=0.031). SBRT were more minimally invasive, however, gastrointestinal disorders, hepatic inflammation and myelosuppression occurred more frequently.

Conclusion: All three approaches could be applied as curative options. Resection remains the best choice for preventing tumor recurrence, and SBRT showed advantages in treating small, recurrent and vascular-type lesions as well as patients with relatively poor liver function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
期刊最新文献
Using computed tomography to evaluate anatomic landmarks in taiwanese trauma patients for insertion of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: A retrospective cohort study. Cardiovascular and all-cause mortality outcomes of adrenalectomy versus medical treatment in primary aldosteronism: an umbrella review. Clinical, sonographic and molecular changes in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder following extracorporeal shockwave therapy: a prospective case-control study. Effect of immunochemotherapy infusion timing, sequence, and interval on prognosis of advanced esophageal cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Identification of genomic alteration and prognosis using pathomics-based artificial intelligence in oral leukoplakia and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1