智能制造系统中的时间序列分类:最先进机器学习算法的实验评估

IF 9.1 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102839
Mojtaba A. Farahani , M.R. McCormick , Ramy Harik , Thorsten Wuest
{"title":"智能制造系统中的时间序列分类:最先进机器学习算法的实验评估","authors":"Mojtaba A. Farahani ,&nbsp;M.R. McCormick ,&nbsp;Ramy Harik ,&nbsp;Thorsten Wuest","doi":"10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Manufacturing is transformed towards smart manufacturing, entering a new data-driven era fueled by digital technologies. The resulting Smart Manufacturing Systems (SMS) gather extensive amounts of diverse data, thanks to the growing number of sensors and rapid advances in sensing technologies. Among the various data types available in SMS settings, time-series data plays a pivotal role. Hence, Time-Series Classification (TSC) emerges as a crucial task in this domain. Over the past decade, researchers have introduced numerous methods for TSC, necessitating not only algorithmic development and analysis but also validation and empirical comparison. This dual approach holds substantial value for practitioners by streamlining choices and revealing insights into models’ strengths and weaknesses. The objective of this study is to fill this gap by providing a rigorous experimental evaluation of the state-of-the-art Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms for TSC tasks in manufacturing and industrial settings. We first explored and compiled a comprehensive list of more than 92 state-of-the-art algorithms from both TSC and manufacturing literature. Following this, we methodologically selected the 36 most representative algorithms from this list. To evaluate their performance across various manufacturing classification tasks, we curated a set of 22 manufacturing datasets, representative of different characteristics that cover diverse manufacturing problems. Subsequently, we implemented and evaluated the algorithms on the manufacturing benchmark datasets, and analyzed the results for each dataset. Based on the results, ResNet, DrCIF, InceptionTime, and ARSENAL emerged as the top-performing algorithms, boasting an average accuracy of over 96.6 % across all 22 manufacturing TSC datasets. These findings underscore the robustness, efficiency, scalability, and effectiveness of convolutional kernels in capturing temporal features in time-series data collected from manufacturing systems for TSC tasks, as three out of the top four performing algorithms leverage these kernels for feature extraction. Additionally, LSTM, BiLSTM, and TS-LSTM algorithms deserve recognition for their effectiveness in capturing features within manufacturing time-series data using RNN-based structures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21452,"journal":{"name":"Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 102839"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-series classification in smart manufacturing systems: An experimental evaluation of state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Mojtaba A. Farahani ,&nbsp;M.R. McCormick ,&nbsp;Ramy Harik ,&nbsp;Thorsten Wuest\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Manufacturing is transformed towards smart manufacturing, entering a new data-driven era fueled by digital technologies. The resulting Smart Manufacturing Systems (SMS) gather extensive amounts of diverse data, thanks to the growing number of sensors and rapid advances in sensing technologies. Among the various data types available in SMS settings, time-series data plays a pivotal role. Hence, Time-Series Classification (TSC) emerges as a crucial task in this domain. Over the past decade, researchers have introduced numerous methods for TSC, necessitating not only algorithmic development and analysis but also validation and empirical comparison. This dual approach holds substantial value for practitioners by streamlining choices and revealing insights into models’ strengths and weaknesses. The objective of this study is to fill this gap by providing a rigorous experimental evaluation of the state-of-the-art Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms for TSC tasks in manufacturing and industrial settings. We first explored and compiled a comprehensive list of more than 92 state-of-the-art algorithms from both TSC and manufacturing literature. Following this, we methodologically selected the 36 most representative algorithms from this list. To evaluate their performance across various manufacturing classification tasks, we curated a set of 22 manufacturing datasets, representative of different characteristics that cover diverse manufacturing problems. Subsequently, we implemented and evaluated the algorithms on the manufacturing benchmark datasets, and analyzed the results for each dataset. Based on the results, ResNet, DrCIF, InceptionTime, and ARSENAL emerged as the top-performing algorithms, boasting an average accuracy of over 96.6 % across all 22 manufacturing TSC datasets. These findings underscore the robustness, efficiency, scalability, and effectiveness of convolutional kernels in capturing temporal features in time-series data collected from manufacturing systems for TSC tasks, as three out of the top four performing algorithms leverage these kernels for feature extraction. Additionally, LSTM, BiLSTM, and TS-LSTM algorithms deserve recognition for their effectiveness in capturing features within manufacturing time-series data using RNN-based structures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing\",\"volume\":\"91 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102839\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736584524001261\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736584524001261","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

制造业正在向智能制造转型,进入一个由数字技术推动的数据驱动的新时代。由于传感器数量的不断增加和传感技术的飞速发展,智能制造系统(SMS)收集了大量不同的数据。在 SMS 环境中的各种数据类型中,时间序列数据起着举足轻重的作用。因此,时间序列分类(TSC)成为该领域的一项重要任务。在过去的十年中,研究人员推出了许多 TSC 方法,不仅需要算法开发和分析,还需要验证和经验比较。这种双重方法可简化选择并揭示模型的优缺点,对从业人员具有重要价值。本研究旨在填补这一空白,针对制造业和工业环境中的 TSC 任务,对最先进的机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)算法进行严格的实验评估。我们首先从 TSC 和制造业文献中探索并汇编了一份超过 92 种最先进算法的综合列表。随后,我们从该列表中筛选出 36 种最具代表性的算法。为了评估这些算法在各种制造分类任务中的性能,我们策划了一组 22 个制造数据集,这些数据集代表了涵盖各种制造问题的不同特征。随后,我们在制造业基准数据集上实施和评估了这些算法,并分析了每个数据集的结果。根据结果,ResNet、DrCIF、InceptionTime 和 ARSENAL 成为表现最佳的算法,在所有 22 个制造业 TSC 数据集上的平均准确率超过 96.6%。这些发现凸显了卷积内核在捕捉从制造系统收集的时间序列数据中的时间特征以执行 TSC 任务方面的稳健性、高效性、可扩展性和有效性,因为在表现最好的四种算法中,有三种都利用了这些内核进行特征提取。此外,LSTM、BiLSTM 和 TS-LSTM 算法在使用基于 RNN 的结构捕捉制造时间序列数据中的特征方面的有效性也值得肯定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time-series classification in smart manufacturing systems: An experimental evaluation of state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms

Manufacturing is transformed towards smart manufacturing, entering a new data-driven era fueled by digital technologies. The resulting Smart Manufacturing Systems (SMS) gather extensive amounts of diverse data, thanks to the growing number of sensors and rapid advances in sensing technologies. Among the various data types available in SMS settings, time-series data plays a pivotal role. Hence, Time-Series Classification (TSC) emerges as a crucial task in this domain. Over the past decade, researchers have introduced numerous methods for TSC, necessitating not only algorithmic development and analysis but also validation and empirical comparison. This dual approach holds substantial value for practitioners by streamlining choices and revealing insights into models’ strengths and weaknesses. The objective of this study is to fill this gap by providing a rigorous experimental evaluation of the state-of-the-art Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms for TSC tasks in manufacturing and industrial settings. We first explored and compiled a comprehensive list of more than 92 state-of-the-art algorithms from both TSC and manufacturing literature. Following this, we methodologically selected the 36 most representative algorithms from this list. To evaluate their performance across various manufacturing classification tasks, we curated a set of 22 manufacturing datasets, representative of different characteristics that cover diverse manufacturing problems. Subsequently, we implemented and evaluated the algorithms on the manufacturing benchmark datasets, and analyzed the results for each dataset. Based on the results, ResNet, DrCIF, InceptionTime, and ARSENAL emerged as the top-performing algorithms, boasting an average accuracy of over 96.6 % across all 22 manufacturing TSC datasets. These findings underscore the robustness, efficiency, scalability, and effectiveness of convolutional kernels in capturing temporal features in time-series data collected from manufacturing systems for TSC tasks, as three out of the top four performing algorithms leverage these kernels for feature extraction. Additionally, LSTM, BiLSTM, and TS-LSTM algorithms deserve recognition for their effectiveness in capturing features within manufacturing time-series data using RNN-based structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing
Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing 工程技术-工程:制造
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The journal, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, focuses on sharing research applications that contribute to the development of new or enhanced robotics, manufacturing technologies, and innovative manufacturing strategies that are relevant to industry. Papers that combine theory and experimental validation are preferred, while review papers on current robotics and manufacturing issues are also considered. However, papers on traditional machining processes, modeling and simulation, supply chain management, and resource optimization are generally not within the scope of the journal, as there are more appropriate journals for these topics. Similarly, papers that are overly theoretical or mathematical will be directed to other suitable journals. The journal welcomes original papers in areas such as industrial robotics, human-robot collaboration in manufacturing, cloud-based manufacturing, cyber-physical production systems, big data analytics in manufacturing, smart mechatronics, machine learning, adaptive and sustainable manufacturing, and other fields involving unique manufacturing technologies.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge extraction for additive manufacturing process via named entity recognition with LLMs Digital Twin-driven multi-scale characterization of machining quality: current status, challenges, and future perspectives A dual knowledge embedded hybrid model based on augmented data and improved loss function for tool wear monitoring A real-time collision avoidance method for redundant dual-arm robots in an open operational environment Less gets more attention: A novel human-centered MR remote collaboration assembly method with information recommendation and visual enhancement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1