儿童早期非营养性吸吮行为(包括安抚奶嘴)对咬合不正的影响:随机对照试验。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European journal of orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjae024
Irma Arpalahti, Krista Hänninen, Mimmi Tolvanen, Juha Varrela, David P Rice
{"title":"儿童早期非营养性吸吮行为(包括安抚奶嘴)对咬合不正的影响:随机对照试验。","authors":"Irma Arpalahti, Krista Hänninen, Mimmi Tolvanen, Juha Varrela, David P Rice","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjae024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/rationale: </strong>Systematic reviews on the effects of pacifiers on occlusion have highlighted the need for quality RCTs.</p><p><strong>Trial design: </strong>Single region, three parallel-armed, prospective, randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the correlations between early childhood non-nutritive sucking habits and malocclusion. Specifically to test whether the use of a study pacifier has differing effects compared to other pacifiers and control, and whether the duration of pacifier use or digit sucking influence the occlusion.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The subjects were firstborn children, born in 2008 in Vantaa, Finland.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>One-third of participants were offered study pacifiers, free of charge, from birth up to 2 years of age. The history of the subjects' sucking habits, including pacifier use was screened in a questionnaire at the age of 2 years, and clinical examinations were performed at the age of 7 years. In addition, the subjects were divided into groups that were equally matched regarding their mother's level of education.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Posterior crossbite, anterior crossbite, overjet, deep bite, open bite, and crowding.</p><p><strong>Randomization method: </strong>Three districts were randomly allocated to three study groups by drawing lots.</p><p><strong>Blinding: </strong>It was not possible to blind the clinicians or parents from the intervention. Blinding during data analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the original cohort of 2715 children born in the town of Vantaa, 1911 were excluded and 353 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 451 children were divided into three groups according to the use of pacifiers. The prevalence of posterior crossbite at the age of 7 years was higher if a non-study pacifier had been used (P = .005) even when matched for the mother's level of education (P = .029). The prevalence of posterior crossbite was higher if the pacifier habit had continued for 12 months or more compared to 11 months or less, 7% and 1%, respectively, (P = .003). Digit sucking for 12 months or more was associated with crowding (P = .016). The prevalence of crossbite in the study pacifier group was less than in control pacifiers.</p><p><strong>Harms: </strong>No adverse harms were reported other than effects on the dentition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of pacifiers is associated with the posterior crossbite, especially if their use continues for a year or more. Parents/guardians should be advised to stop the use or reduce the use of pacifiers to a minimum after their child's first birthday.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01854502.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"46 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of early childhood non-nutritive sucking behavior including pacifiers on malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Irma Arpalahti, Krista Hänninen, Mimmi Tolvanen, Juha Varrela, David P Rice\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ejo/cjae024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/rationale: </strong>Systematic reviews on the effects of pacifiers on occlusion have highlighted the need for quality RCTs.</p><p><strong>Trial design: </strong>Single region, three parallel-armed, prospective, randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the correlations between early childhood non-nutritive sucking habits and malocclusion. Specifically to test whether the use of a study pacifier has differing effects compared to other pacifiers and control, and whether the duration of pacifier use or digit sucking influence the occlusion.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The subjects were firstborn children, born in 2008 in Vantaa, Finland.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>One-third of participants were offered study pacifiers, free of charge, from birth up to 2 years of age. The history of the subjects' sucking habits, including pacifier use was screened in a questionnaire at the age of 2 years, and clinical examinations were performed at the age of 7 years. In addition, the subjects were divided into groups that were equally matched regarding their mother's level of education.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Posterior crossbite, anterior crossbite, overjet, deep bite, open bite, and crowding.</p><p><strong>Randomization method: </strong>Three districts were randomly allocated to three study groups by drawing lots.</p><p><strong>Blinding: </strong>It was not possible to blind the clinicians or parents from the intervention. Blinding during data analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the original cohort of 2715 children born in the town of Vantaa, 1911 were excluded and 353 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 451 children were divided into three groups according to the use of pacifiers. The prevalence of posterior crossbite at the age of 7 years was higher if a non-study pacifier had been used (P = .005) even when matched for the mother's level of education (P = .029). The prevalence of posterior crossbite was higher if the pacifier habit had continued for 12 months or more compared to 11 months or less, 7% and 1%, respectively, (P = .003). Digit sucking for 12 months or more was associated with crowding (P = .016). The prevalence of crossbite in the study pacifier group was less than in control pacifiers.</p><p><strong>Harms: </strong>No adverse harms were reported other than effects on the dentition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of pacifiers is associated with the posterior crossbite, especially if their use continues for a year or more. Parents/guardians should be advised to stop the use or reduce the use of pacifiers to a minimum after their child's first birthday.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01854502.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310778/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjae024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjae024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/理论依据:有关安抚奶嘴对闭塞影响的系统性综述强调了对高质量 RCT 的需求:试验设计:单地区、三平行臂、前瞻性、随机对照试验:研究儿童早期非营养性吸吮习惯与咬合不正之间的相关性。特别是测试使用研究奶嘴与其他奶嘴和对照组相比是否有不同的效果,以及使用奶嘴的时间长短或数字吸吮是否会影响咬合:干预措施:干预措施:三分之一的受试者在出生至两岁期间免费使用研究用安抚奶嘴。研究人员在受试者两岁时对其吸吮习惯(包括使用安抚奶嘴)进行问卷调查,并在受试者七岁时对其进行临床检查。此外,受试者还被分为母亲受教育程度相同的两组:结果:后交叉咬合、前交叉咬合、过咬合、深咬合、开放咬合和拥挤:通过抽签将三个地区随机分配到三个研究组:盲法:无法对临床医生或家长进行干预盲法。在数据分析过程中进行了盲法:在万达镇出生的 2715 名儿童中,1911 名被排除在外,353 名失去了随访机会。剩下的 451 名儿童根据使用安抚奶嘴的情况被分为三组。如果使用的是非研究用安抚奶嘴,则7岁时后牙交叉咬合的发生率更高(P = .005),即使与母亲的教育水平相匹配(P = .029)也是如此。如果持续使用安抚奶嘴的时间在 12 个月或以上,则后交叉咬合的发生率要高于持续使用安抚奶嘴的时间在 11 个月或以下的儿童,分别为 7% 和 1% (P = .003)。吮吸数字12个月或更长时间与牙齿拥挤有关(P = .016)。研究安抚奶嘴组的交叉咬合发生率低于对照组:危害:除对牙齿的影响外,没有其他不良危害的报告:结论:使用安抚奶嘴与后方牙齿交叉咬合有关,尤其是在持续使用一年或一年以上的情况下。建议家长/监护人在孩子一岁后停止使用或尽量减少使用安抚奶嘴:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01854502。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of early childhood non-nutritive sucking behavior including pacifiers on malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.

Background/rationale: Systematic reviews on the effects of pacifiers on occlusion have highlighted the need for quality RCTs.

Trial design: Single region, three parallel-armed, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: To investigate the correlations between early childhood non-nutritive sucking habits and malocclusion. Specifically to test whether the use of a study pacifier has differing effects compared to other pacifiers and control, and whether the duration of pacifier use or digit sucking influence the occlusion.

Participants: The subjects were firstborn children, born in 2008 in Vantaa, Finland.

Intervention: One-third of participants were offered study pacifiers, free of charge, from birth up to 2 years of age. The history of the subjects' sucking habits, including pacifier use was screened in a questionnaire at the age of 2 years, and clinical examinations were performed at the age of 7 years. In addition, the subjects were divided into groups that were equally matched regarding their mother's level of education.

Outcomes: Posterior crossbite, anterior crossbite, overjet, deep bite, open bite, and crowding.

Randomization method: Three districts were randomly allocated to three study groups by drawing lots.

Blinding: It was not possible to blind the clinicians or parents from the intervention. Blinding during data analysis was performed.

Results: From the original cohort of 2715 children born in the town of Vantaa, 1911 were excluded and 353 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 451 children were divided into three groups according to the use of pacifiers. The prevalence of posterior crossbite at the age of 7 years was higher if a non-study pacifier had been used (P = .005) even when matched for the mother's level of education (P = .029). The prevalence of posterior crossbite was higher if the pacifier habit had continued for 12 months or more compared to 11 months or less, 7% and 1%, respectively, (P = .003). Digit sucking for 12 months or more was associated with crowding (P = .016). The prevalence of crossbite in the study pacifier group was less than in control pacifiers.

Harms: No adverse harms were reported other than effects on the dentition.

Conclusion: The use of pacifiers is associated with the posterior crossbite, especially if their use continues for a year or more. Parents/guardians should be advised to stop the use or reduce the use of pacifiers to a minimum after their child's first birthday.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01854502.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
期刊最新文献
Clinical risk factors caused by third molar levelling following extraction of a mandibular second molar. Does incisor inclination change during orthodontic treatment affect gingival thickness and the width of keratinized gingiva? A prospective controlled study. Roles of B-cell lymphoma 6 in orthodontic tooth movement of rat molars. Influence of genetic and environmental factors on transverse growth. The effect of micro-osteoperforation (MOP) in molar distalization treatments: an exploratory systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1