Jeong Hyeon Hwang , Tae-Rim Choi , Suwon Kim , Yeda Lee , Yuni Shin , Suhye Choi , Jinok Oh , Sang-Hyoun Kim , Jeong-Hoon Park , Shashi Kant Bhatia , Yung-Hun Yang
{"title":"评估用于细菌群体磷脂脂肪酸 (PLFA) 分析的简化酯联脂肪酸分析法 (ELFA)。","authors":"Jeong Hyeon Hwang , Tae-Rim Choi , Suwon Kim , Yeda Lee , Yuni Shin , Suhye Choi , Jinok Oh , Sang-Hyoun Kim , Jeong-Hoon Park , Shashi Kant Bhatia , Yung-Hun Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ab.2024.115638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis is used for characterizing microbial communities based on their lipid profiles. This method avoids biases from PCR or culture, allowing data collection in a natural state. However, PLFA is labor-intensive due to lipid fractionation. Simplified ester-linked fatty acid analysis (ELFA), which skips lipid fractionation, offers an alternative. It utilizes base-catalyzed methylation to derivatize only lipids, not free fatty acids, and found glycolipid and neutral lipid fractions are scarcely present in most bacteria, allowing lipid fractionation to be skipped. ELFA method showed a high correlation to PLFA data (r = 0.99) and higher sensitivity than the PLFA method by 1.5–2.57-fold, mainly due to the higher recovery of lipids, which was 1.5–1.9 times higher than with PLFA. The theoretical limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for the ELFA method indicated that 1.54-fold less sample was needed for analysis than with the PLFA method. Our analysis of three bacterial cultures and a simulated consortium revealed the effectiveness of the ELFA method by its simple procedure and enhanced sensitivity for detecting strain-specific markers, which were not detected in PLFA analysis. Overall, this method could be easily used for the population analysis of synthetic consortia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7830,"journal":{"name":"Analytical biochemistry","volume":"695 ","pages":"Article 115638"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of simplified ester-linked fatty acid analysis (ELFA) for phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis of bacterial population\",\"authors\":\"Jeong Hyeon Hwang , Tae-Rim Choi , Suwon Kim , Yeda Lee , Yuni Shin , Suhye Choi , Jinok Oh , Sang-Hyoun Kim , Jeong-Hoon Park , Shashi Kant Bhatia , Yung-Hun Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ab.2024.115638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis is used for characterizing microbial communities based on their lipid profiles. This method avoids biases from PCR or culture, allowing data collection in a natural state. However, PLFA is labor-intensive due to lipid fractionation. Simplified ester-linked fatty acid analysis (ELFA), which skips lipid fractionation, offers an alternative. It utilizes base-catalyzed methylation to derivatize only lipids, not free fatty acids, and found glycolipid and neutral lipid fractions are scarcely present in most bacteria, allowing lipid fractionation to be skipped. ELFA method showed a high correlation to PLFA data (r = 0.99) and higher sensitivity than the PLFA method by 1.5–2.57-fold, mainly due to the higher recovery of lipids, which was 1.5–1.9 times higher than with PLFA. The theoretical limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for the ELFA method indicated that 1.54-fold less sample was needed for analysis than with the PLFA method. Our analysis of three bacterial cultures and a simulated consortium revealed the effectiveness of the ELFA method by its simple procedure and enhanced sensitivity for detecting strain-specific markers, which were not detected in PLFA analysis. Overall, this method could be easily used for the population analysis of synthetic consortia.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"695 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115638\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003269724001829\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003269724001829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of simplified ester-linked fatty acid analysis (ELFA) for phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis of bacterial population
Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis is used for characterizing microbial communities based on their lipid profiles. This method avoids biases from PCR or culture, allowing data collection in a natural state. However, PLFA is labor-intensive due to lipid fractionation. Simplified ester-linked fatty acid analysis (ELFA), which skips lipid fractionation, offers an alternative. It utilizes base-catalyzed methylation to derivatize only lipids, not free fatty acids, and found glycolipid and neutral lipid fractions are scarcely present in most bacteria, allowing lipid fractionation to be skipped. ELFA method showed a high correlation to PLFA data (r = 0.99) and higher sensitivity than the PLFA method by 1.5–2.57-fold, mainly due to the higher recovery of lipids, which was 1.5–1.9 times higher than with PLFA. The theoretical limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for the ELFA method indicated that 1.54-fold less sample was needed for analysis than with the PLFA method. Our analysis of three bacterial cultures and a simulated consortium revealed the effectiveness of the ELFA method by its simple procedure and enhanced sensitivity for detecting strain-specific markers, which were not detected in PLFA analysis. Overall, this method could be easily used for the population analysis of synthetic consortia.
期刊介绍:
The journal''s title Analytical Biochemistry: Methods in the Biological Sciences declares its broad scope: methods for the basic biological sciences that include biochemistry, molecular genetics, cell biology, proteomics, immunology, bioinformatics and wherever the frontiers of research take the field.
The emphasis is on methods from the strictly analytical to the more preparative that would include novel approaches to protein purification as well as improvements in cell and organ culture. The actual techniques are equally inclusive ranging from aptamers to zymology.
The journal has been particularly active in:
-Analytical techniques for biological molecules-
Aptamer selection and utilization-
Biosensors-
Chromatography-
Cloning, sequencing and mutagenesis-
Electrochemical methods-
Electrophoresis-
Enzyme characterization methods-
Immunological approaches-
Mass spectrometry of proteins and nucleic acids-
Metabolomics-
Nano level techniques-
Optical spectroscopy in all its forms.
The journal is reluctant to include most drug and strictly clinical studies as there are more suitable publication platforms for these types of papers.