管理热带土壤可持续谷物生产系统的权衡取舍

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil & Tillage Research Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.still.2024.106251
Edson Marcio Mattiello , Gustavo Franco de Castro , Bernardo Amorim da Silva , Ivan Francisco de Souza , Leandro Zancanaro , Fabio Benedito Ono , Felipe Bertol , Eros Artur Bohac Francisco , Claudinei Kappes , Reinaldo Bertola Cantarutti
{"title":"管理热带土壤可持续谷物生产系统的权衡取舍","authors":"Edson Marcio Mattiello ,&nbsp;Gustavo Franco de Castro ,&nbsp;Bernardo Amorim da Silva ,&nbsp;Ivan Francisco de Souza ,&nbsp;Leandro Zancanaro ,&nbsp;Fabio Benedito Ono ,&nbsp;Felipe Bertol ,&nbsp;Eros Artur Bohac Francisco ,&nbsp;Claudinei Kappes ,&nbsp;Reinaldo Bertola Cantarutti","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2024.106251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Long-term sustainability of intensive cropping systems in tropical soils depends on strategies to reconcile grain output, cover crops to maximize biomass yield for soil mulching, and maintaining soil organic carbon (SOC). In this study, we evaluated spatiotemporal constraints underpinning the diversification from soybean (<em>Glycine max</em> (L.) Merr.) monoculture under conventional tillage (CT) or no-tillage (NT) and soybean in succession with maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) double cropping (NTS3) to the use of millet (<em>Pennisetum glaucum</em> L., NTS1) and brachiaria (<em>Brachiaria ruziziensis</em> (R.Germ. &amp; Evrard) Crins, NTS2) in successions or millet, crotalaria (<em>Crotalaria spectabilis</em> Roth.), and maize+brachiaria in rotations in a 12-year field experiment in an Oxisol. We quantified total grain output, total biomass production, and SOC contents and stocks (0–40 cm depth). Over 12 years, cumulative grain output under the double cropping (NTS3) was 135.0 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>, with soybean-maize proportions of 35–65 %. Thus, the successions NTS1 and NTS2 would reduce maize grain output relative to NTS3 (7.3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>). Under the rotations, reduction in soybean and maize grain output relative to NTS3 was about 1.4 and 4.1 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Biomass production under NTS3 was 12.0 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> but reached 15.7 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> under the rotation including summer soybean (1st and 2nd years) and off-season crotalaria (1st year) or maize+brachiria (2nd year), and only brachiaria (3rd year). Under this rotation, changes in SOC stocks were +2.0 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> for the 0–40 cm depth layer, whereas under NTS3 it was +1.4 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, relative to the native Cerrrado. For soybean monoculture under CT or NT changes in SOC were about −0.5 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> relative to the native Cerrado. Overall, despite the reduced total grain output, the rotation system proposed may be critical to reconcile sustainable food security, soil protection by mulching and SOC maintenance in agricultural Cerrado soils.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 106251"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tradeoffs to manage sustainable systems of grain production in tropical soils\",\"authors\":\"Edson Marcio Mattiello ,&nbsp;Gustavo Franco de Castro ,&nbsp;Bernardo Amorim da Silva ,&nbsp;Ivan Francisco de Souza ,&nbsp;Leandro Zancanaro ,&nbsp;Fabio Benedito Ono ,&nbsp;Felipe Bertol ,&nbsp;Eros Artur Bohac Francisco ,&nbsp;Claudinei Kappes ,&nbsp;Reinaldo Bertola Cantarutti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2024.106251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Long-term sustainability of intensive cropping systems in tropical soils depends on strategies to reconcile grain output, cover crops to maximize biomass yield for soil mulching, and maintaining soil organic carbon (SOC). In this study, we evaluated spatiotemporal constraints underpinning the diversification from soybean (<em>Glycine max</em> (L.) Merr.) monoculture under conventional tillage (CT) or no-tillage (NT) and soybean in succession with maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) double cropping (NTS3) to the use of millet (<em>Pennisetum glaucum</em> L., NTS1) and brachiaria (<em>Brachiaria ruziziensis</em> (R.Germ. &amp; Evrard) Crins, NTS2) in successions or millet, crotalaria (<em>Crotalaria spectabilis</em> Roth.), and maize+brachiaria in rotations in a 12-year field experiment in an Oxisol. We quantified total grain output, total biomass production, and SOC contents and stocks (0–40 cm depth). Over 12 years, cumulative grain output under the double cropping (NTS3) was 135.0 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>, with soybean-maize proportions of 35–65 %. Thus, the successions NTS1 and NTS2 would reduce maize grain output relative to NTS3 (7.3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>). Under the rotations, reduction in soybean and maize grain output relative to NTS3 was about 1.4 and 4.1 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Biomass production under NTS3 was 12.0 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> but reached 15.7 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> under the rotation including summer soybean (1st and 2nd years) and off-season crotalaria (1st year) or maize+brachiria (2nd year), and only brachiaria (3rd year). Under this rotation, changes in SOC stocks were +2.0 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> for the 0–40 cm depth layer, whereas under NTS3 it was +1.4 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, relative to the native Cerrrado. For soybean monoculture under CT or NT changes in SOC were about −0.5 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> relative to the native Cerrado. Overall, despite the reduced total grain output, the rotation system proposed may be critical to reconcile sustainable food security, soil protection by mulching and SOC maintenance in agricultural Cerrado soils.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"244 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724002526\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724002526","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

热带土壤集约化种植系统的长期可持续性取决于如何协调谷物产量、覆盖作物以最大限度地提高土壤覆盖的生物量产量以及保持土壤有机碳(SOC)的策略。在这项研究中,我们评估了从传统耕作(CT)或免耕(NT)下的大豆(L. Merr.)单一种植、大豆与玉米(L. )双季连作(NTS3)到使用小米(L. Lerr.)、荞麦(L. Merr.)和藜麦(L. Merr.)(NTS1)的多样化过程中的时空限制因素、NTS1)和钎草((R.Germ. & Evrard) Crins,NTS2)连作,或小米、牛筋草(Roth.)和玉米+钎草轮作。我们对谷物总产量、生物量总产量、SOC 含量和储量(0-40 厘米深)进行了量化。在 12 年中,双季种植(NTS3)的累计谷物产量为 1.35 亿公顷,其中大豆-玉米比例为 35-65%。因此,与 NTS3(每年 7.3 百万公顷)相比,NTS1 和 NTS2 将减少玉米产量。在轮作模式下,相对于 NTS3,大豆和玉米谷物产量每年分别减少约 140 万和 410 万克/公顷。在 NTS3 下,生物量产量为每年 1 200 万克/公顷,但在包括夏季大豆(第 1 年和第 2 年)和反季节牛筋草(第 1 年)或玉米+牛筋草(第 2 年)以及仅牛筋草(第 3 年)的轮作下,生物量产量达到每年 1 570 万克/公顷。在这种轮作下,0-40 厘米深层的 SOC 储量变化为每年 +2.0 兆克公顷,而在 NTS3 下,相对于原生的 Cerrrado,SOC 储量变化为每年 +1.4兆克公顷。在 CT 或 NT 条件下单一种植大豆,SOC 的变化与原生塞拉多相比约为每年-0.5 兆克公顷。总体而言,尽管粮食总产量有所降低,但所建议的轮作系统对于协调可持续粮食安全、通过覆盖保护土壤以及保持塞拉多农业土壤中的 SOC 至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tradeoffs to manage sustainable systems of grain production in tropical soils

Long-term sustainability of intensive cropping systems in tropical soils depends on strategies to reconcile grain output, cover crops to maximize biomass yield for soil mulching, and maintaining soil organic carbon (SOC). In this study, we evaluated spatiotemporal constraints underpinning the diversification from soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) monoculture under conventional tillage (CT) or no-tillage (NT) and soybean in succession with maize (Zea mays L.) double cropping (NTS3) to the use of millet (Pennisetum glaucum L., NTS1) and brachiaria (Brachiaria ruziziensis (R.Germ. & Evrard) Crins, NTS2) in successions or millet, crotalaria (Crotalaria spectabilis Roth.), and maize+brachiaria in rotations in a 12-year field experiment in an Oxisol. We quantified total grain output, total biomass production, and SOC contents and stocks (0–40 cm depth). Over 12 years, cumulative grain output under the double cropping (NTS3) was 135.0 Mg ha−1, with soybean-maize proportions of 35–65 %. Thus, the successions NTS1 and NTS2 would reduce maize grain output relative to NTS3 (7.3 Mg ha−1 year−1). Under the rotations, reduction in soybean and maize grain output relative to NTS3 was about 1.4 and 4.1 Mg ha−1 year−1, respectively. Biomass production under NTS3 was 12.0 Mg ha−1 year−1 but reached 15.7 Mg ha−1 year−1 under the rotation including summer soybean (1st and 2nd years) and off-season crotalaria (1st year) or maize+brachiria (2nd year), and only brachiaria (3rd year). Under this rotation, changes in SOC stocks were +2.0 Mg ha−1 year−1 for the 0–40 cm depth layer, whereas under NTS3 it was +1.4 Mg ha−1 year−1, relative to the native Cerrrado. For soybean monoculture under CT or NT changes in SOC were about −0.5 Mg ha−1 year−1 relative to the native Cerrado. Overall, despite the reduced total grain output, the rotation system proposed may be critical to reconcile sustainable food security, soil protection by mulching and SOC maintenance in agricultural Cerrado soils.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
期刊最新文献
Drivers of soil quality and maize yield under long-term tillage and straw incorporation in Mollisols Improving the accuracy of soil organic matter mapping in typical Planosol areas based on prior knowledge and probability hybrid model Straw incorporating in shallow soil layer improves field productivity by impacting soil hydrothermal conditions and maize reproductive allocation in semiarid east African Plateau Significant increases in nitrous oxide emissions under simulated extreme rainfall events and straw amendments from agricultural soil Improved soil organic matter monitoring by using cumulative crop residue indices derived from time-series remote sensing images in the central black soil region of China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1