Julian A Gingold, Alexander Kucherov, Haotian Wu, Melissa Fazzari, Harry Lieman, G David Ball, Kevin Doody, Sangita Jindal
{"title":"PGT-A 与新鲜而非冷冻捐献卵母细胞试管婴儿周期的活产率降低有关:对向 SART CORS 报告的 18,562 个供体周期的分析。","authors":"Julian A Gingold, Alexander Kucherov, Haotian Wu, Melissa Fazzari, Harry Lieman, G David Ball, Kevin Doody, Sangita Jindal","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on first transfer live birth rate (LBR) and cumulative LBR (CLBR) in donor oocyte in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Fertility centers reporting to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.</p><p><strong>Patient(s): </strong>A total of 11,348 fresh and 7,214 frozen-thawed donor oocyte IVF cycles were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>The first reported donor stimulation cycle per patient between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, and all linked embryo transfer cycles between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Live birth rate was compared for patients using fresh and frozen-thawed donor oocytes, with or without PGT-A. Logistic regression models were adjusted for age, body mass index, gravidity, infertility etiology, and prior IVF cycles.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>Among patients who had blastocysts available for transfer or PGT-A, the use of PGT-A was associated with a decreased first transfer LBR (46.9 vs. 53.2%) and CLBR (58.4 vs. 66.6%) in fresh oocyte donor cycles compared with no PGT-A. Live birth rate in frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles with PGT-A were nominally higher than those without PGT-A (48.3% vs. 40.5%) but were not statistically significant in multivariable logistic regression models. Early pregnancy loss was not significantly different with and without PGT-A. Multiple gestation, preterm birth, and low birth weight infants were all reduced with the addition of PGT-A in fresh donor oocyte cycles, although these outcomes were not significantly different when comparing single embryo transfers in fresh oocyte cycles and also not significantly different among frozen-thawed donor oocyte cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in fresh oocyte donor cycles was associated with decreased LBR and CLBR, whereas effects on frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles were clinically negligible. Obstetric benefits associated with PGT-A in fresh donor cycles appear linked to increased single embryo transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":"50-60"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is associated with reduced live birth rates in fresh but not frozen donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 18,562 donor cycles reported to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System.\",\"authors\":\"Julian A Gingold, Alexander Kucherov, Haotian Wu, Melissa Fazzari, Harry Lieman, G David Ball, Kevin Doody, Sangita Jindal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on first transfer live birth rate (LBR) and cumulative LBR (CLBR) in donor oocyte in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Fertility centers reporting to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.</p><p><strong>Patient(s): </strong>A total of 11,348 fresh and 7,214 frozen-thawed donor oocyte IVF cycles were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>The first reported donor stimulation cycle per patient between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, and all linked embryo transfer cycles between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Live birth rate was compared for patients using fresh and frozen-thawed donor oocytes, with or without PGT-A. Logistic regression models were adjusted for age, body mass index, gravidity, infertility etiology, and prior IVF cycles.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>Among patients who had blastocysts available for transfer or PGT-A, the use of PGT-A was associated with a decreased first transfer LBR (46.9 vs. 53.2%) and CLBR (58.4 vs. 66.6%) in fresh oocyte donor cycles compared with no PGT-A. Live birth rate in frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles with PGT-A were nominally higher than those without PGT-A (48.3% vs. 40.5%) but were not statistically significant in multivariable logistic regression models. Early pregnancy loss was not significantly different with and without PGT-A. Multiple gestation, preterm birth, and low birth weight infants were all reduced with the addition of PGT-A in fresh donor oocyte cycles, although these outcomes were not significantly different when comparing single embryo transfers in fresh oocyte cycles and also not significantly different among frozen-thawed donor oocyte cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in fresh oocyte donor cycles was associated with decreased LBR and CLBR, whereas effects on frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles were clinically negligible. Obstetric benefits associated with PGT-A in fresh donor cycles appear linked to increased single embryo transfer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"50-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.315\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.315","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is associated with reduced live birth rates in fresh but not frozen donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 18,562 donor cycles reported to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on first transfer live birth rate (LBR) and cumulative LBR (CLBR) in donor oocyte in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.
Design: Retrospective cohort study of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database.
Setting: Fertility centers reporting to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Patient(s): A total of 11,348 fresh and 7,214 frozen-thawed donor oocyte IVF cycles were analyzed.
Intervention(s): The first reported donor stimulation cycle per patient between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, and all linked embryo transfer cycles between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, were included in the study.
Main outcome measure(s): Live birth rate was compared for patients using fresh and frozen-thawed donor oocytes, with or without PGT-A. Logistic regression models were adjusted for age, body mass index, gravidity, infertility etiology, and prior IVF cycles.
Result(s): Among patients who had blastocysts available for transfer or PGT-A, the use of PGT-A was associated with a decreased first transfer LBR (46.9 vs. 53.2%) and CLBR (58.4 vs. 66.6%) in fresh oocyte donor cycles compared with no PGT-A. Live birth rate in frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles with PGT-A were nominally higher than those without PGT-A (48.3% vs. 40.5%) but were not statistically significant in multivariable logistic regression models. Early pregnancy loss was not significantly different with and without PGT-A. Multiple gestation, preterm birth, and low birth weight infants were all reduced with the addition of PGT-A in fresh donor oocyte cycles, although these outcomes were not significantly different when comparing single embryo transfers in fresh oocyte cycles and also not significantly different among frozen-thawed donor oocyte cycles.
Conclusion(s): Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in fresh oocyte donor cycles was associated with decreased LBR and CLBR, whereas effects on frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles were clinically negligible. Obstetric benefits associated with PGT-A in fresh donor cycles appear linked to increased single embryo transfer.
期刊介绍:
Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.