PGT-A 与新鲜而非冷冻捐献卵母细胞试管婴儿周期的活产率降低有关:对向 SART CORS 报告的 18,562 个供体周期的分析。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Fertility and sterility Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.315
Julian A Gingold, Alexander Kucherov, Haotian Wu, Melissa Fazzari, Harry Lieman, G David Ball, Kevin Doody, Sangita Jindal
{"title":"PGT-A 与新鲜而非冷冻捐献卵母细胞试管婴儿周期的活产率降低有关:对向 SART CORS 报告的 18,562 个供体周期的分析。","authors":"Julian A Gingold, Alexander Kucherov, Haotian Wu, Melissa Fazzari, Harry Lieman, G David Ball, Kevin Doody, Sangita Jindal","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on first transfer live birth rate (LBR) and cumulative LBR (CLBR) in donor oocyte in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Fertility centers reporting to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.</p><p><strong>Patient(s): </strong>A total of 11,348 fresh and 7,214 frozen-thawed donor oocyte IVF cycles were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>The first reported donor stimulation cycle per patient between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, and all linked embryo transfer cycles between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Live birth rate was compared for patients using fresh and frozen-thawed donor oocytes, with or without PGT-A. Logistic regression models were adjusted for age, body mass index, gravidity, infertility etiology, and prior IVF cycles.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>Among patients who had blastocysts available for transfer or PGT-A, the use of PGT-A was associated with a decreased first transfer LBR (46.9 vs. 53.2%) and CLBR (58.4 vs. 66.6%) in fresh oocyte donor cycles compared with no PGT-A. Live birth rate in frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles with PGT-A were nominally higher than those without PGT-A (48.3% vs. 40.5%) but were not statistically significant in multivariable logistic regression models. Early pregnancy loss was not significantly different with and without PGT-A. Multiple gestation, preterm birth, and low birth weight infants were all reduced with the addition of PGT-A in fresh donor oocyte cycles, although these outcomes were not significantly different when comparing single embryo transfers in fresh oocyte cycles and also not significantly different among frozen-thawed donor oocyte cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in fresh oocyte donor cycles was associated with decreased LBR and CLBR, whereas effects on frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles were clinically negligible. Obstetric benefits associated with PGT-A in fresh donor cycles appear linked to increased single embryo transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":"50-60"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is associated with reduced live birth rates in fresh but not frozen donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 18,562 donor cycles reported to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System.\",\"authors\":\"Julian A Gingold, Alexander Kucherov, Haotian Wu, Melissa Fazzari, Harry Lieman, G David Ball, Kevin Doody, Sangita Jindal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on first transfer live birth rate (LBR) and cumulative LBR (CLBR) in donor oocyte in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Fertility centers reporting to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.</p><p><strong>Patient(s): </strong>A total of 11,348 fresh and 7,214 frozen-thawed donor oocyte IVF cycles were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>The first reported donor stimulation cycle per patient between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, and all linked embryo transfer cycles between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Live birth rate was compared for patients using fresh and frozen-thawed donor oocytes, with or without PGT-A. Logistic regression models were adjusted for age, body mass index, gravidity, infertility etiology, and prior IVF cycles.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>Among patients who had blastocysts available for transfer or PGT-A, the use of PGT-A was associated with a decreased first transfer LBR (46.9 vs. 53.2%) and CLBR (58.4 vs. 66.6%) in fresh oocyte donor cycles compared with no PGT-A. Live birth rate in frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles with PGT-A were nominally higher than those without PGT-A (48.3% vs. 40.5%) but were not statistically significant in multivariable logistic regression models. Early pregnancy loss was not significantly different with and without PGT-A. Multiple gestation, preterm birth, and low birth weight infants were all reduced with the addition of PGT-A in fresh donor oocyte cycles, although these outcomes were not significantly different when comparing single embryo transfers in fresh oocyte cycles and also not significantly different among frozen-thawed donor oocyte cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in fresh oocyte donor cycles was associated with decreased LBR and CLBR, whereas effects on frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles were clinically negligible. Obstetric benefits associated with PGT-A in fresh donor cycles appear linked to increased single embryo transfer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"50-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.315\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.315","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估植入前非整倍体基因检测(PGT-A)对供卵试管婴儿周期中首次移植活产率(LBR)和累计活产率(CLBR)的影响:设计:SART CORS 数据库的回顾性队列研究:研究对象:分析了11348个新鲜和7214个冷冻解冻的供体卵母细胞IVF周期。暴露:研究纳入了每位患者在2014年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间首次报告的供体刺激周期,以及2014年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间的所有关联胚胎移植周期:比较了使用新鲜和冷冻解冻供体卵母细胞的患者的LBR,有无PGT-A。逻辑回归模型对年龄、体重指数、孕酮、不孕病因和之前的试管婴儿周期进行了调整:结果:在有囊胚可供移植或有 PGT-A 的患者中,使用 PGT-A 与首次移植 LBR 的降低有关(46.9% 对 53.2%,P 结论:PGT-A 与首次移植 LBR 的降低有关:在新鲜卵母细胞捐献周期中,PGT-A 与 LBR 和 CLBR 的降低有关,而对冻融卵母细胞捐献周期的影响在临床上可以忽略不计。在新鲜供卵周期中使用 PGT-A 所带来的顺产益处似乎与单胚胎移植的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is associated with reduced live birth rates in fresh but not frozen donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 18,562 donor cycles reported to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on first transfer live birth rate (LBR) and cumulative LBR (CLBR) in donor oocyte in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.

Design: Retrospective cohort study of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database.

Setting: Fertility centers reporting to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Patient(s): A total of 11,348 fresh and 7,214 frozen-thawed donor oocyte IVF cycles were analyzed.

Intervention(s): The first reported donor stimulation cycle per patient between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, and all linked embryo transfer cycles between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, were included in the study.

Main outcome measure(s): Live birth rate was compared for patients using fresh and frozen-thawed donor oocytes, with or without PGT-A. Logistic regression models were adjusted for age, body mass index, gravidity, infertility etiology, and prior IVF cycles.

Result(s): Among patients who had blastocysts available for transfer or PGT-A, the use of PGT-A was associated with a decreased first transfer LBR (46.9 vs. 53.2%) and CLBR (58.4 vs. 66.6%) in fresh oocyte donor cycles compared with no PGT-A. Live birth rate in frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles with PGT-A were nominally higher than those without PGT-A (48.3% vs. 40.5%) but were not statistically significant in multivariable logistic regression models. Early pregnancy loss was not significantly different with and without PGT-A. Multiple gestation, preterm birth, and low birth weight infants were all reduced with the addition of PGT-A in fresh donor oocyte cycles, although these outcomes were not significantly different when comparing single embryo transfers in fresh oocyte cycles and also not significantly different among frozen-thawed donor oocyte cycles.

Conclusion(s): Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in fresh oocyte donor cycles was associated with decreased LBR and CLBR, whereas effects on frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles were clinically negligible. Obstetric benefits associated with PGT-A in fresh donor cycles appear linked to increased single embryo transfer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
期刊最新文献
Sleep variability and time to achieving pregnancy: findings from a pilot cohort study of women desiring pregnancy. Erratum to "Higher live birth rates are associated with a normal body mass index in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System study" [Fertil Steril 2024;121:291-98]. Accessory uterine cavities: a review of cases and an appeal for standard terminology. Robotic-Assisted Neovaginal Creation: Stepwise Approach to the Davydov Technique in a Patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome. Systemic Progesterone Optimizes Programmed FET Outcomes: The Only Level I Evidence Still Indicates Intramuscular (IM) Administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1