腹部与腹腔镜肌瘤术后的妊娠和分娩结局:美国人口数据库评估腹腔镜子宫肌瘤:美国人口数据库评估》。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Fertility and sterility Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.321
Perrine Ginod, Ahmad Badeghiesh, Haitham Baghlaf, Michael H Dahan
{"title":"腹部与腹腔镜肌瘤术后的妊娠和分娩结局:美国人口数据库评估腹腔镜子宫肌瘤:美国人口数据库评估》。","authors":"Perrine Ginod, Ahmad Badeghiesh, Haitham Baghlaf, Michael H Dahan","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate population characteristics and obstetric complications after abdominal myomectomy vs. laparoscopic myomectomy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient(s): </strong>A total of 13,868 and 338 pregnancies after abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy, respectively.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Obstetrics outcomes following abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy were collected.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Obstetric outcomes after abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomies were collected using hospital discharges from 2004 to 2014 inclusively, and adjusted using multiple and binomial logistic regression in different models for age, obesity, chronic hypertension, and pregestational diabetes mellitus. Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>Abdominal myomectomy were characterized by younger patients, lower rates of Caucasian, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, active smoking, illicit drug use, and higher rates of previous cesarean delivery, and multiple gestations when compared with laparoscopic myomectomy. Pregnant women with laparoscopic myomectomy had decreased rates of pregnancy-induced hypertension (adjusted risk ratios [aRR], 0.12; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.006-0.24]), gestational hypertension (aRR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.76), pre-eclampsia (aRR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.48), and pre-eclampsia or eclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension (aRR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.005-0.3), gestational diabetes mellitus (aRR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.34), preterm premature rupture of membranes (aRR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02-0.96), preterm delivery (aRR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23-0.55), and cesarean delivery (aRR, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.007-0.01) and small for gestational age (aRR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.005-0.04), compared with abdominal myomectomy group. Laparoscopic myomectomy group had a higher rate of spontaneous (aRR, 35.57; 95% CI, 22.53-62.66), and operative vaginal delivery (aRR, 10.2; 95% CI, 8.3-12.56), uterine rupture (aRR, 6.1; 95% CI, 3.2-11.63), postpartum hemorrhage (aRR, 3.54; 95% CI, 2.62-4.8), hysterectomy (aRR, 7.74; 95% CI, 5.27-11.4), transfusion (aRR, 3.34; 95% CI, 2.54-4.4), pulmonary embolism (aRR, 7.44; 95% CI, 2.44-22.71), disseminated intravascular coagulation (aRR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.47-5.21), maternal infection (aRR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5), death (aRR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.31-3.2), and intrauterine fetal death (aRR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.72-5.2) compared with the abdominal myomectomy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Women who had a previous abdominal myomectomy have underlying risk factors for hypertension disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes. Women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomies have higher risks of bleeding, uterine rupture, resultant complications, and death, and should be monitored as high-risk patients, like abdominal myomectomies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":"164-172"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pregnancy and delivery outcomes after abdominal vs. laparoscopic myomectomy: an evaluation of an American population database.\",\"authors\":\"Perrine Ginod, Ahmad Badeghiesh, Haitham Baghlaf, Michael H Dahan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate population characteristics and obstetric complications after abdominal myomectomy vs. laparoscopic myomectomy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient(s): </strong>A total of 13,868 and 338 pregnancies after abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy, respectively.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Obstetrics outcomes following abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy were collected.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Obstetric outcomes after abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomies were collected using hospital discharges from 2004 to 2014 inclusively, and adjusted using multiple and binomial logistic regression in different models for age, obesity, chronic hypertension, and pregestational diabetes mellitus. Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>Abdominal myomectomy were characterized by younger patients, lower rates of Caucasian, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, active smoking, illicit drug use, and higher rates of previous cesarean delivery, and multiple gestations when compared with laparoscopic myomectomy. Pregnant women with laparoscopic myomectomy had decreased rates of pregnancy-induced hypertension (adjusted risk ratios [aRR], 0.12; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.006-0.24]), gestational hypertension (aRR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.76), pre-eclampsia (aRR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.48), and pre-eclampsia or eclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension (aRR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.005-0.3), gestational diabetes mellitus (aRR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.34), preterm premature rupture of membranes (aRR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02-0.96), preterm delivery (aRR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23-0.55), and cesarean delivery (aRR, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.007-0.01) and small for gestational age (aRR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.005-0.04), compared with abdominal myomectomy group. Laparoscopic myomectomy group had a higher rate of spontaneous (aRR, 35.57; 95% CI, 22.53-62.66), and operative vaginal delivery (aRR, 10.2; 95% CI, 8.3-12.56), uterine rupture (aRR, 6.1; 95% CI, 3.2-11.63), postpartum hemorrhage (aRR, 3.54; 95% CI, 2.62-4.8), hysterectomy (aRR, 7.74; 95% CI, 5.27-11.4), transfusion (aRR, 3.34; 95% CI, 2.54-4.4), pulmonary embolism (aRR, 7.44; 95% CI, 2.44-22.71), disseminated intravascular coagulation (aRR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.47-5.21), maternal infection (aRR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5), death (aRR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.31-3.2), and intrauterine fetal death (aRR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.72-5.2) compared with the abdominal myomectomy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Women who had a previous abdominal myomectomy have underlying risk factors for hypertension disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes. Women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomies have higher risks of bleeding, uterine rupture, resultant complications, and death, and should be monitored as high-risk patients, like abdominal myomectomies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"164-172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.321\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.321","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估腹部子宫肌瘤切除术与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术后的人群特征和产科并发症:设计:回顾性队列研究,使用医疗成本与利用项目全国住院病人样本,出院时间为 2004 年至 2014 年:研究对象腹腔镜或腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术后分别有 13868 例和 338 例妊娠:收集腹腔镜和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术后的产科结果:方法:采用多元和二项逻辑回归,并在不同模型中对年龄、肥胖、慢性高血压和妊娠前糖尿病进行调整:对妊娠、分娩和新生儿结局进行分析:结果:与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术相比,腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的特点是患者更年轻,白种人、慢性高血压、妊娠糖尿病、主动吸烟、使用违禁药物的比例更低,既往剖宫产和多胎妊娠的比例更高。接受腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的孕妇妊娠诱发高血压[调整风险比(aRR)0.12,95%置信区间(CI)0.006-0.24]、妊娠高血压(aRR 0.24,95%CI 0.08-0.76)、子痫前期(aRR 0.18,95%CI 0.07-0.48)、子痫前期或子痫叠加慢性高血压(aRR 0.03,95%CI 0.005-0.3)、妊娠糖尿病(aRR 0.14,95%CI 0.06-0.34)、早产胎膜早破(aRR 0.14,95%CI 0.02-0.96)、早产(aRR 0.36,95%CI 0.23-0.55)、剖宫产(CD)(aRR 0.01,95%CI 0.007-0.01)和小胎龄(aRR 0.15,95%CI 0.005-0.04)。腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术组的自然分娩率(aRR 35.57,95%CI 22.53-62.66)、手术阴道分娩率(aRR 10.2,95%CI 8.3-12.56)、子宫破裂率(95%CI 0.007-0.01)和胎龄小率(aRR 0.15,95%CI 0.005-0.04)均高于腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术组。95%CI 3.2-11.63)、产后出血(aRR 3.54,95%CI 2.62-4.8)、子宫切除(aRR 7.74,95%CI 5.27-11.4)、输血(aRR 3.34,95%CI 2.54-4.4)、肺栓塞(aRR 7.44,95%CI 2.44-22.71)、弥散性血管内凝血(aRR 2.77,95%CI 1.47-5.21)、产妇感染(aRR 1.66,95%CI 1.与腹部子宫肌瘤剔除组相比,腹部子宫肌瘤剔除组的产妇死亡率较高,主要原因包括:产妇感染(aRR 1.66,95%CI 1.31-2.5)、死亡(aRR 2.04,95%CI 1.31-3.2)和胎儿宫内死亡(aRR 2.99,95%CI 1.72-5.2):结论:既往接受过腹部子宫肌瘤剔除术的女性具有妊娠高血压和妊娠糖尿病的潜在风险因素。接受腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的女性出血、子宫破裂、并发症和死亡的风险较高,应像腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术一样作为高危患者进行监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pregnancy and delivery outcomes after abdominal vs. laparoscopic myomectomy: an evaluation of an American population database.

Objective: To evaluate population characteristics and obstetric complications after abdominal myomectomy vs. laparoscopic myomectomy.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Patient(s): A total of 13,868 and 338 pregnancies after abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy, respectively.

Exposure: Obstetrics outcomes following abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy were collected.

Main outcome measure(s): Obstetric outcomes after abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomies were collected using hospital discharges from 2004 to 2014 inclusively, and adjusted using multiple and binomial logistic regression in different models for age, obesity, chronic hypertension, and pregestational diabetes mellitus. Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were analyzed.

Result(s): Abdominal myomectomy were characterized by younger patients, lower rates of Caucasian, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, active smoking, illicit drug use, and higher rates of previous cesarean delivery, and multiple gestations when compared with laparoscopic myomectomy. Pregnant women with laparoscopic myomectomy had decreased rates of pregnancy-induced hypertension (adjusted risk ratios [aRR], 0.12; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.006-0.24]), gestational hypertension (aRR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.76), pre-eclampsia (aRR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.48), and pre-eclampsia or eclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension (aRR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.005-0.3), gestational diabetes mellitus (aRR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.34), preterm premature rupture of membranes (aRR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02-0.96), preterm delivery (aRR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23-0.55), and cesarean delivery (aRR, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.007-0.01) and small for gestational age (aRR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.005-0.04), compared with abdominal myomectomy group. Laparoscopic myomectomy group had a higher rate of spontaneous (aRR, 35.57; 95% CI, 22.53-62.66), and operative vaginal delivery (aRR, 10.2; 95% CI, 8.3-12.56), uterine rupture (aRR, 6.1; 95% CI, 3.2-11.63), postpartum hemorrhage (aRR, 3.54; 95% CI, 2.62-4.8), hysterectomy (aRR, 7.74; 95% CI, 5.27-11.4), transfusion (aRR, 3.34; 95% CI, 2.54-4.4), pulmonary embolism (aRR, 7.44; 95% CI, 2.44-22.71), disseminated intravascular coagulation (aRR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.47-5.21), maternal infection (aRR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5), death (aRR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.31-3.2), and intrauterine fetal death (aRR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.72-5.2) compared with the abdominal myomectomy group.

Conclusion(s): Women who had a previous abdominal myomectomy have underlying risk factors for hypertension disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes. Women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomies have higher risks of bleeding, uterine rupture, resultant complications, and death, and should be monitored as high-risk patients, like abdominal myomectomies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
期刊最新文献
Sleep variability and time to achieving pregnancy: findings from a pilot cohort study of women desiring pregnancy. Erratum to "Higher live birth rates are associated with a normal body mass index in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System study" [Fertil Steril 2024;121:291-98]. Accessory uterine cavities: a review of cases and an appeal for standard terminology. Robotic-Assisted Neovaginal Creation: Stepwise Approach to the Davydov Technique in a Patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome. Systemic Progesterone Optimizes Programmed FET Outcomes: The Only Level I Evidence Still Indicates Intramuscular (IM) Administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1