美国一家大型医疗保健系统利用综合基因组图谱测试对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床影响

R. Meng , A.K. Dowdell , A. Vita , D. Hanes , B. Bapat , S.-C. Chang , L. Harold , M. Schmidt , C. Wong , H. Poon , B. Schroeder , R. Weerasinghe , R. Sanborn , R. Leidner , W.J. Urba , C. Bifulco , B. Piening
{"title":"美国一家大型医疗保健系统利用综合基因组图谱测试对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床影响","authors":"R. Meng ,&nbsp;A.K. Dowdell ,&nbsp;A. Vita ,&nbsp;D. Hanes ,&nbsp;B. Bapat ,&nbsp;S.-C. Chang ,&nbsp;L. Harold ,&nbsp;M. Schmidt ,&nbsp;C. Wong ,&nbsp;H. Poon ,&nbsp;B. Schroeder ,&nbsp;R. Weerasinghe ,&nbsp;R. Sanborn ,&nbsp;R. Leidner ,&nbsp;W.J. Urba ,&nbsp;C. Bifulco ,&nbsp;B. Piening","doi":"10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>New breakthroughs in precision therapies are transforming cancer care for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To this effect, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has emerged as a streamlined workflow to test for all relevant tumor biomarkers within a single assay. Despite this, there are still significant gaps in access to CGP testing, with many patients only tested for a subset of biomarkers or not tested at all.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We assessed the clinical impact of wide deployment of an in-house CGP assay at a large health care system in the United States by analyzing a cohort of advanced-stage NSCLC patients who received CGP testing and a retrospective cohort that was tested with a prior-generation 50-gene assay (small panel).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-seven percent of CGP-tested NSCLC patients had one or more tumor biomarkers that were actionable for a precision therapy compared to 63% of small panel-tested patients. CGP-tested patients with an actionable biomarker received appropriate precision therapies at a higher rate than small panel-tested patients (64% versus 50%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and there were marked improvements in survival outcomes for patients tested with CGP [median overall survival (OS) 15.7 months versus 7 months, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These data demonstrate clear precision therapy selection and patient OS benefits from universal access to CGP testing. Despite this, not all patients with an actionable biomarker received a precision therapy, suggesting that there are still gaps between access to CGP testing and access to precision therapies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100491,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000353/pdfft?md5=d0e01e23ae951e134ce56aabf66c771f&pid=1-s2.0-S2949820124000353-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical impact for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients tested using comprehensive genomic profiling at a large USA health care system\",\"authors\":\"R. Meng ,&nbsp;A.K. Dowdell ,&nbsp;A. Vita ,&nbsp;D. Hanes ,&nbsp;B. Bapat ,&nbsp;S.-C. Chang ,&nbsp;L. Harold ,&nbsp;M. Schmidt ,&nbsp;C. Wong ,&nbsp;H. Poon ,&nbsp;B. Schroeder ,&nbsp;R. Weerasinghe ,&nbsp;R. Sanborn ,&nbsp;R. Leidner ,&nbsp;W.J. Urba ,&nbsp;C. Bifulco ,&nbsp;B. Piening\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>New breakthroughs in precision therapies are transforming cancer care for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To this effect, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has emerged as a streamlined workflow to test for all relevant tumor biomarkers within a single assay. Despite this, there are still significant gaps in access to CGP testing, with many patients only tested for a subset of biomarkers or not tested at all.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We assessed the clinical impact of wide deployment of an in-house CGP assay at a large health care system in the United States by analyzing a cohort of advanced-stage NSCLC patients who received CGP testing and a retrospective cohort that was tested with a prior-generation 50-gene assay (small panel).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-seven percent of CGP-tested NSCLC patients had one or more tumor biomarkers that were actionable for a precision therapy compared to 63% of small panel-tested patients. CGP-tested patients with an actionable biomarker received appropriate precision therapies at a higher rate than small panel-tested patients (64% versus 50%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and there were marked improvements in survival outcomes for patients tested with CGP [median overall survival (OS) 15.7 months versus 7 months, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These data demonstrate clear precision therapy selection and patient OS benefits from universal access to CGP testing. Despite this, not all patients with an actionable biomarker received a precision therapy, suggesting that there are still gaps between access to CGP testing and access to precision therapies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000353/pdfft?md5=d0e01e23ae951e134ce56aabf66c771f&pid=1-s2.0-S2949820124000353-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景精准疗法的新突破正在改变晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的癌症治疗。为此,综合基因组图谱(CGP)作为一种简化的工作流程应运而生,可在一次检测中检测所有相关的肿瘤生物标记物。材料与方法我们通过分析接受 CGP 检测的晚期 NSCLC 患者队列和接受上一代 50 基因检测(小面板)的回顾性队列,评估了美国一家大型医疗保健系统广泛部署内部 CGP 检测的临床影响。结果在接受CGP检测的NSCLC患者中,77%的患者有一个或多个肿瘤生物标记物可用于精准治疗,而在接受小样本检测的患者中,这一比例为63%。与小样本检测患者相比,接受CGP检测的具有可操作生物标志物的患者接受适当精准治疗的比例更高(64%对50%,P <0.001),而且接受CGP检测的患者的生存结果明显改善[中位总生存期(OS)15.7个月对7个月,P <0.0001]。尽管如此,并非所有具有可操作生物标志物的患者都接受了精准治疗,这表明 CGP 检测的普及与精准治疗的普及之间仍存在差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical impact for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients tested using comprehensive genomic profiling at a large USA health care system

Background

New breakthroughs in precision therapies are transforming cancer care for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To this effect, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has emerged as a streamlined workflow to test for all relevant tumor biomarkers within a single assay. Despite this, there are still significant gaps in access to CGP testing, with many patients only tested for a subset of biomarkers or not tested at all.

Materials and methods

We assessed the clinical impact of wide deployment of an in-house CGP assay at a large health care system in the United States by analyzing a cohort of advanced-stage NSCLC patients who received CGP testing and a retrospective cohort that was tested with a prior-generation 50-gene assay (small panel).

Results

Seventy-seven percent of CGP-tested NSCLC patients had one or more tumor biomarkers that were actionable for a precision therapy compared to 63% of small panel-tested patients. CGP-tested patients with an actionable biomarker received appropriate precision therapies at a higher rate than small panel-tested patients (64% versus 50%, P < 0.001), and there were marked improvements in survival outcomes for patients tested with CGP [median overall survival (OS) 15.7 months versus 7 months, P < 0.0001].

Conclusions

These data demonstrate clear precision therapy selection and patient OS benefits from universal access to CGP testing. Despite this, not all patients with an actionable biomarker received a precision therapy, suggesting that there are still gaps between access to CGP testing and access to precision therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utility of automated data transfer for cancer clinical trials and considerations for implementation Characterisation of oncology EHR-derived real-world data in the UK, Germany, and Japan Evolving treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma post-avelumab maintenance approval: insights from The US Oncology Network Collaborating across sectors in service of open science, precision oncology, and patients: an overview of the AACR Project GENIE (Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange) Biopharma Collaborative (BPC) Data analytics for real-world data integration in TKI-treated NSCLC patients using electronic health records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1